NO TROLLS Hawthorn Racism Review - Sensitive issues discussed.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don’t use this thread as an opportunity to troll North or any other clubs, you’ll be removed from the discussion. Stick to the topic and please keep it civil and respectful to those involved. Keep personal arguements out of this thread.
Help moderators by not quoting obvious trolls and use the report button, please and thank you.

If you feel upset or need to talk you can call either Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 or Lifeline on 13 11 14 at any time.

- Crisis support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders 13YARN (13 92 76) 13YARN - Call 13 92 76 | 24 /7

This is a serious topic, please treat it as such.

Videos, statements etc in the OP here:



Link to Hawthorn Statement. - Link to ABC Sports article. - Leaked Report
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

.... OK, lets hear it.
Why should Jeff Kennett be sacked over this?

( Going to regret asking ).
Aristotle is just trying to keep the focus away from Dimma's support of Clarko after going really hard on everyone else not from Richmond for doing the same
 
You didn't read the Caro article properly did you.


How do you sack the president?
The players should strike until he's removed.

'The AFL is understood to be aware of allegations against Clarkson that involve Mitchell, who, according to The Age, was told to hand in his mobile on the eve of the club's match against Sydney in 2011.

The rest of the team was also required to hand over their phones, however Mitchell's twin babies were frequently facing health concerns and were requiring often treatment in hospital following their birth.
Both Sam and Lyndall Mitchell had feared for daughter Scarlett's survival at a young age. Then-football boss Mark Evans is understood to have stepped in and returned Mitchell's phone to him so he could remain in contact with his wife.

The Age have also reported further allegations against Clarkson that surround his controlling behaviour have surfaced, with the four-time premiership coach alleged to have:
1/Expressed surprise before the twins' birth that Mitchell was having children so close together (the Mitchell's son Smith was 11 months old when the twins were born) and wondered at the effect this might have upon his playing career.
2/Publicly announced Mitchell was missing a game against Richmond due to personal reasons relating to the twins' health without the player's knowledge or consent.
Ultimately agreed to treat Mitchell with more respect when the pair resolved their differences at the end of the season but again questioned the wisdom of the timing of the twins' birth.
 
Because the mob wants blood. They can smell it but haven’t tasted it yet. Eyes are rolling back in heads.
Sp you agree with Kennett bagging the players for telling their story to the ABC, trying to brush it under the carpet, disrepecting Cyril's wife, and bragging on 3aw of his massive gollywog collection with one called Buddy?
 
"Waaahhhh!!! Waaaahhhhh!!!! Why dont evreyone wait until Clarky Clarkonson has responded? Had no right to respond, unable to say anything, gagged, mouth sewn shut with sewing utensils, look you can see the stitches!!!! Fago too!!! Witch hunt witch hunt! Bigfooty board is Salem!!!"

Get stuffed, Newbold had the report for coming up to a month now, don't tell me he didn't give his old mate "you can call me al" the little heads up? Just a quick texty "Hey Stairs, Newbolds here, remember that report the Hawks did? Racism or something? Well I seen it and we're fked hey".

Al's had plenty of time to respond you gronks, plenty of time.
 
Impeachment
Impeachment, lets go!
The players should strike until he's removed.
It's the offseason and as far as I know he's stepping down at the AGM already.

'The AFL is understood to be aware of allegations against Clarkson that involve Mitchell, who, according to The Age, was told to hand in his mobile on the eve of the club's match against Sydney in 2011.

The rest of the team was also required to hand over their phones, however Mitchell's twin babies were frequently facing health concerns and were requiring often treatment in hospital following their birth.
Both Sam and Lyndall Mitchell had feared for daughter Scarlett's survival at a young age. Then-football boss Mark Evans is understood to have stepped in and returned Mitchell's phone to him so he could remain in contact with his wife.

The Age have also reported further allegations against Clarkson that surround his controlling behaviour have surfaced, with the four-time premiership coach alleged to have:
1/Expressed surprise before the twins' birth that Mitchell was having children so close together (the Mitchell's son Smith was 11 months old when the twins were born) and wondered at the effect this might have upon his playing career.
2/Publicly announced Mitchell was missing a game against Richmond due to personal reasons relating to the twins' health without the player's knowledge or consent.
Ultimately agreed to treat Mitchell with more respect when the pair resolved their differences at the end of the season but again questioned the wisdom of the timing of the twins' birth.
So uh, which Mitchell do you think might have been playing for Hawthorn in 2011 because it wasn't Tom
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The AFL has a history of sweeping unpleasantness under the carpet - the concussion study is a prime, prime example.

I agree with that but worksafe has a similar history of botching investigations or sweeping them under the rug. Im not sure why anyone would have confidence in them to investigate this properly either
 
Okay, so you just don’t know what the idiom “stitch up” means. You could have just said that.

Try not being a smart arse. You're deficient of certain qualities to pull it off.

Just so we're clear...imo it's a stitch up given the leak and how it's being played out in the media.

Get off your high horse.
 
Just curious
How would you all react if after the AFLs process and/or court hearing, Clarkson & Fagan are allowed to resume working?

Would many of you question the verdict and boycott the AFL?
 
Repeating this ad nauseum does not eventually make it true.

As opposed to the repetition from your end. You do realise it's ok for multiple points of view without having to scream down those who don't agree 100% with the popular view.

And again, they may well have done as has been alleged and if they did, I'll call for their removal from the game. Until that time....
 
Just curious
How would you all react if after the AFLs process and/or court hearing, Clarkson & Fagan are allowed to resume working?

Would many of you question the verdict and boycott the AFL?

Minds dont change when emotive issues are involved.

Many here made up their mind based on the heading before they started reading the article.
 
As opposed to the repetition from your end. You do realise it's ok for multiple points of view without having to scream down those who don't agree 100% with the popular view.

And again, they may well have done as has been alleged and if they did, I'll call for their removal from the game. Until that time....

The post was in response to your claim they did not have an opportunity to respond when this was clearly not the case. I highlighted the relevant portion in bold. It's not just a matter of differing opinion on a controversial topic - it is undisputed fact.
 
Worksafe are in on it now. North need a new coach.

If it came to that
Wouldn't we need to remove everyone involved in the coaching ranks during that time.

Bevo
Hardwick
Simpson
Yze
Ratten

Of course North will get ****ed over like usual.
People aren't consistent and are showing their biases towards North.
 
If it came to that
Wouldn't we need to remove everyone involved in the coaching ranks during that time.

Bevo
Hardwick
Simpson
Yze
Ratten

Of course North will get *ed over like usual.
People aren't consistent and are showing their biases towards North.
It's entirely dependent on who exactly contributed to what's been alleged. If any of those 5 did, they'd probably also be nervous, but until now they've not been named anywhere in the Hawthorn report or subsequent news articles - likely for a reason.
 
If it came to that
Wouldn't we need to remove everyone involved in the coaching ranks during that time.

Bevo
Hardwick
Simpson
Yze
Ratten

Of course North will get *ed over like usual.
People aren't consistent and are showing their biases towards North.

That is hopefully a part of it.

How widespread was it. At what level were these discissions happening. How widespread with other players and coaches was it.

And the bigger one, how did all the other clubs manage their player / coach interactions and decision making.
 
So he's denied wrongdoing.

Not that he didn't do the things that he's been accused of - just that there was no wrongdoing.

The allegations made are "allegations of wrongdoing". He denies the "allegations of wrongdoing."

You stated that "Clarkson and Fagan haven't denied that these things happened". "These things [that allegedly] happened" are the allegations made. They are alleged to have happened at a certain place at a certain time in a certain way. Which are "allegations of wrongdoing". Which have been denied by Fagan in his statement.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top