![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/collingwood.png)
Maybe 'The wood shed'The Round House has a nice ring to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 24
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Maybe 'The wood shed'The Round House has a nice ring to it.
The sun roof looks really nice, but the exterior has the vibe of a public libraryThe new renders are out for the new Tassie Stadium, and it looks really good.
AFL welcomes new concept designs for Hobart stadium - https://www.afl.com.au/news/1166552View attachment 2041480View attachment 2041482
Better than a water tank or an office block.The sun roof looks really nice, but the exterior has the vibe of a public library
Its Tasmania. They wouldn't know what a Libary looks like.The sun roof looks really nice, but the exterior has the vibe of a public library
WTF is a LIBARY!!! Is that an Adelaide thing?Its Tasmania. They wouldn't know what a Libary looks like.
Yes, we have one. I think it's in the city somewhere. I dont think it's an urban legend.WTF is a LIBARY!!! Is that an Adelaide thing?
See if you can find a photo of it.Yes, we have one. I think it's in the city somewhere. I dont think it's an urban legend.
How much will it cost later to upgrade from 23000 to 31000, and tourism should work harder to attract more then 5000 visitors. I think that number is too low.Would've required $100m more from the federal government.
The commercial model estimates that around 5,000 people will travel per game to Hobart.
It won't cost the federal government anything. They won't be paying for it, not their problem.How much will it cost later to upgrade from 23000 to 31000
I would expect the AFL to pay some of the costs to any upgrade.It won't cost the federal government anything. They won't be paying for it, not their problem.
The state government can much more easily commit to it "later" (even if it requires $200m) when the stadium has proven itself as an asset, as seen recently with the Marvel Stadium upgrade. They can't do it now because they said all along they'll only pay 50% max for the initial build.
Do NRL, Aleague, NBL, Tennis, swimming or any pay for stadium/facility buildings or improvements?I would expect the AFL to pay some of the costs to any upgrade.
I did say SOME of costs of the upgrade.Do NRL, Aleague, NBL, Tennis, swimming or any pay for stadium/facility buildings or improvements?
I did say SOME of costs of the upgrade.
Read my posts in full before commenting.
The AFL contributed to the upgrades of the stadiums in Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast, Western Sydney, Geelong, Docklands (albeit which it owns), and the initial construction costs in Hobart. It's a reasonable assumption.Why would you expect it though when no other sporting body is expected to put a cent towards stadia?
Oh dear! They pay NOTHING. So why should the AFL? Its our team, our finances, our stadium, for our other uses.I did say SOME of costs of the upgrade.
Read my posts in full before commenting.
they didnt pay anything to perthThe AFL contributed to the upgrades of the stadiums in Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast, Western Sydney, Geelong, Docklands (albeit which it owns), and the initial construction costs in Hobart. It's a reasonable assumption.
The AFL contributed to the upgrades of the stadiums in Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast, Western Sydney, Geelong, Docklands (albeit which it owns), and the initial construction costs in Hobart. It's a reasonable assumption.
Qui plus financially?Oh dear! They pay NOTHING. So why should the AFL? Its our team, our finances, our stadium, for our other uses.
Ah yep, you're right. They didn't. There was talk of it early on though.they didnt pay anything to perth
I guess the difference is most sports aren't in a position to do so, whereas the AFL is. And in this Hobart instance it's actively putting requirements, not requests, on the government in the construction of the stadium.They shouldn't contribute anything until all the other bottom feeders put their hands in their pockets too.
Not true. It was the Tasmanian government's own taskforce in 2019 which actively declared a new CBD-based roofed stadium would be required. The AFL accepted the declaration, indicative of the passive party.I guess the difference is most sports aren't in a position to do so, whereas the AFL is. And in this Hobart instance it's actively putting requirements, not requests, on the government in the construction of the stadium.
No, which is why they generally play in dingy paddocks.Do NRL, Aleague, NBL, Tennis, swimming or any pay for stadium/facility buildings or improvements?
So that includes swimming & tennis does it?No, which is why they generally play in dingy paddocks.
There's a reason why I used the word generally in that sentence.So that includes swimming & tennis does it?![]()