- Mar 18, 2011
- 7,189
- 781
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Banned
- #1
I was discussing this the other day about how silly these awards are with my friend with the exception of maybe the derbies. Is there any real point to having them when really it is just another game for 4 points?
The biggest one that stands out for me is the supposed importance of Anzac Day when really it is no different and no more important than the game in the later part of the season. Further the myth regarding how good some one is for winning so many Anzac day medals is also pointless, especially when it is used by an Essendon or Collingwood supporter to justify how good some one is for example. The fact that it can only be won by members of two clubs shows how insignificant it is in relation to the Brownlow or the the AFLPA MVP.
Now some might argue that how does this differ from the Norm Smith Medal but when you go for the Norm Smith you are playing for the premiership.
Therefore I argue that it is just stupid to hear people use home and away game medals (like my stupid Essendon and Collingwood supporter friends) to justify how good a player like James Hird was.
Discuss!
The biggest one that stands out for me is the supposed importance of Anzac Day when really it is no different and no more important than the game in the later part of the season. Further the myth regarding how good some one is for winning so many Anzac day medals is also pointless, especially when it is used by an Essendon or Collingwood supporter to justify how good some one is for example. The fact that it can only be won by members of two clubs shows how insignificant it is in relation to the Brownlow or the the AFLPA MVP.
Now some might argue that how does this differ from the Norm Smith Medal but when you go for the Norm Smith you are playing for the premiership.
Therefore I argue that it is just stupid to hear people use home and away game medals (like my stupid Essendon and Collingwood supporter friends) to justify how good a player like James Hird was.
Discuss!