How do you rate our list? Do you agree with my A-D rating?

[Sonsofthescray]

 

[dergert]

Hey mate, really good table. Agree with most, but it appears they're all fwd and mids. No backs have been uploaded! Would be keen to see how you rate the defenders!

 

[dergert]

My apologies, just clicked the thumbnail!

 

[jdz101]

Excel game strong...reckon Bailey Dale will be a B in your book after this season.

 

[ScragCity]

Change Mclean to A+

 

[BEaston]

What's the context? Current form? Career best? Rolling 2 year average? Max potential?

 

[Sonsofthescray]

Excel game strong...reckon Bailey Dale will be a B in your book after this season.

I hope so! I think we lack great kicking skills so hopefully he develops

 

[Sonsofthescray]

What's the context? Current form? Career best? Rolling 2 year average? Max potential?

Right now, not potential or what has been

 

[Scary_Foot_9]

Bont isn't an inside mid he is an everything.

 

[BEaston]

I see it as:
A - star
B - solid contributor, ie performs weekly
C - role player or inconsistent
D - developing/bust

and I assessed them in the role they play and the impact on the team winning. Also assuming full fitness for all players.

So in the context of right now:

Bontempelli A
Macrae A
Dahlhaus A
Daniel A
Hunter B
Wallis B
Picken B
Dunkley C
Jong C
Webb C
Liberatore C
Honeychurch D


Stringer A
Dickson A
McLean B
Crameri B (this is based on pre-ban and pre-hip injury as it's the last reliable data IMO, otherwise he's a C or D)
Redpath C
Cloke C
Smith C
Dale C
Hamilton D
Young D
Lipinski D
Greene D

Wood A
Morris A
Adams A
Johannisen A
Murphy A
Suckling B
Biggs B
Boyd C
Williams C
Cordy Z C
Roberts C
Collins D

Boyd B
Roughead B
Campbell C
English D

 

[LittleG]

Love Murphy but he has lost a step, no longer elite.
Jong is C, Smith is B and Campbell is D.
New draftees should be ungraded until debut or at least *.

 

[Substance]

I just hate how you misspelled Bontempelli.

And Liberatore.

 

[Mattdougie]

Geez a lot of As going around

I would rate them this way

A - Star, match winner
B - consistently high output
C - consensus best 22
D - depth, possible best 22
E - done, not good enough
NR- draftees, rookies

Now using my ratings this is how I rate the players on our list

Bontempelli A
Macrae A
Dahlhaus A
Daniel B
Hunter B
Wallis B
Picken C
Dunkley D
Jong D
Webb D
Liberatore C
Honeychurch E
Stringer A
Dickson B
McLean C
Crameri C
Redpath D
Cloke D
Smith D
Dale D
Hamilton NR
Young NR
Lipinski NR
Greene NR
Wood A
Morris A
Adams C
Johannisen A
Murphy B
Suckling C
Biggs C
M Boyd D
Williams D
Cordy Z D
Roberts D
Collins NR
T Boyd C
Roughead B
Campbell E
English NR

 

[Yojimbo]

I don't personally rate the A,B,C and D method of rating players
as the various roles are so different and while Bontempelli is
clearly an A grader for his poise, vision and ball use and the
versatility position wise he does not have elite leg speed. Saying
that however the other facets of his game more than provide
compensation and make him an A grader and our best player
easily.

So A grade- Bontempelli. (Then the rest start at B+)

I prefer a school like system that judges multiple facets that
illuminate strengths and weaknesses as this blend of talents is
what makes a great team.

 

[compact72]

Jong A

EFA. *runs*

Joking btw, not trying to start another debate out it

 

[Mattdougie]

EFA. *runs*

Joking btw, not trying to start another debate out it

I will hunt you down and kill you

 

[BEaston]

Love Murphy but he has lost a step, no longer elite.
Jong is C, Smith is B and Campbell is D.
New draftees should be ungraded until debut or at least *.

Yeah I was borderline on Murphy A/B

 

[BEaston]

I don't personally rate the A,B,C and D method of rating players
as the various roles are so different and while Bontempelli is
clearly an A grader for his poise, vision and ball use and the
versatility position wise he does not have elite leg speed. Saying
that however the other facets of his game more than provide
compensation and make him an A grader and our best player
easily.

So A grade- Bontempelli. (Then the rest start at B+)

I prefer a school like system that judges multiple facets that
illuminate strengths and weaknesses as this blend of talents is
what makes a great team.

That's why I said: I assessed them in the role they play and the impact on the team winning.

 

[Dry Rot]

Geez a lot of As going around

I would rate them this way

A - Star, match winner
B - consistently high output
C - consensus best 22
D - depth, possible best 22
E - done, not good enough
NR- draftees, rookies

Now using my ratings this is how I rate the players on our list

Bontempelli A
Macrae A
Dahlhaus A
Daniel B
Hunter B
Wallis B
Picken C
Dunkley D
Jong D
Webb D
Liberatore C
Honeychurch E
Stringer A
Dickson B
McLean C
Crameri C
Redpath D
Cloke D
Smith D
Dale D
Hamilton NR
Young NR
Lipinski NR
Greene NR
Wood A
Morris A
Adams C
Johannisen A
Murphy B
Suckling C
Biggs C
M Boyd D
Williams D
Cordy Z D
Roberts D
Collins NR
T Boyd C
Roughead B
Campbell E
English NR

Well done.

Good, fair effort. Hard to disagree with much of that.

 

[DelRe]

View attachment 376476 View attachment 376476 View attachment 376476

Great thread starter. Probably staying the obvious but whichever way you define the grade Libba does stand out. He's not on his own in terms of below expectations but to me would have the biggest gap between current performance and what we've already seen he's capable of. Could be a big impact if he can turn it around in the second half of the year.

 

[bontshow]

You get an A, you get an A, everyone gets an A!

Clay Smith isn't even best 22, let alone an A grader

 

[Yojimbo]

That's why I said: I assessed them in the role they play and the impact on the team winning.

Sorry fpcookie , i was responding to the rating system rather than
any particular rating on a particular individual player. I agree with
the way you qualified your rankings as the whole comparing any
group who are sent out with different mission statements is at
best a problematic exercise.

Note- Used the word Mission, sponsors tick.

 

[the conch]

Excel game strong...reckon Bailey Dale will be a B in your book after this season.

reminds me of Higgins,

 

[The Slitherin' Snake]

What do the colours refer to?

 

[Cori]

I see it as:
A - star
B - solid contributor, ie performs weekly
C - role player or inconsistent
D - developing/bust

Agreed with 90% of yours fp but I have the day off so I can muck around a bit:

Bontempelli A
Macrae A
Dahlhaus A
Daniel A
Hunter A (definitely an A, excels in all roles he is asked to play)
Wallis B
Picken B
Jong B (has lifted his game big time this season, great contributor despite the occasional misstep)
Dunkley C
Webb C
Liberatore C
Honeychurch D

Stringer A (would he have been a B if he hadn't been BoG last week?)
Dickson A
McLean B
Redpath C (I see him similar to Jong but not quite the consistency)
Crameri C
Cloke C
Smith C
Dale C (I reckon Dale could be considered a B after drastically improving this season too)
Hamilton D
Young D
Lipinski D
Greene D

Wood A
Morris A
Adams A
Johannisen A
Murphy A
Roberts B (Roberts has been consistent this season, I feel he was dropped because of match ups)
Williams B (another that has just lifted his game this season, similar to Jong the way he has stepped up)
Suckling B
Biggs B
Boyd C (really struggling this season, would have been top of the As this time last season)
Cordy Z C
Collins D

Boyd B
Roughead B (definitely would be an A if he wasn't coming back from his injury)
Campbell C
English D

We have a solid list right now imo. Really pleased with the way Dale, Jong and Williams have improved. Love the way Wallis has come back and hasn't missed a beat. Really disappointed in how Libba has let his game slide and saddened by Boyd's fall from grace. Campbell will need to figure out how to fit into our side, likewise with Crameri (albeit after he recovers), Cordy and Webb.