- Mar 5, 2015
- 2,861
- 3,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
If my year 2 math is correct a mid second is actually pick 27.Mid 2nd which is around pick 35
Unless we find a wood duck
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If my year 2 math is correct a mid second is actually pick 27.Mid 2nd which is around pick 35
Unless we find a wood duck
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
It's ironical marty36 isn't called bonkers, because you make sense & he is completely bonkers!If my year 2 math is correct a mid second is actually pick 27.
That’s what happens when your picks are low percentage picksWhat are you talking about we have a list drafted with pure genius
To suggest we haven't drafted well is unusual
Maybe you are misreading how well we have drafted a premiership list
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Who has it been bad for?Has CEY's emergence been a good or bad thing for the club?
Greenwood, Gibbs, Milera and JonesWho has it been bad for?
Polholke perhaps.
Gibbs it would have made no difference as his issues are off field.
Greenwood missed most of preseason.
Greenwood can't even run out 4 quarters - no.Greenwood, Gibbs, Milera and Jones
Do the positive of CEY's good form outweigh the opportunities that have dried up for others?
Greenwood doesn't need to run out four quarters in the midfield. He's a mid/fwd whose midfield minutes have dried up.Greenwood can't even run out 4 quarters - no.
Gibbs' head is not on football - no.
Milera could have been played more on ball, but more about the selection of our rotations by our coaches - no.
Jones - should be playing wing instead of our 3 underperforming wingmen - no.
Polholke is the one imo who has missed out.
Really so you haven't heard if possible priority picks and academy picksIf my year 2 math is correct a mid second is actually pick 27.
Assuming there is an unlikely priority pick, the middle of the second round becomes 27.5. Still closer than to 27 than 35.Really so you haven't heard if possible priority picks and academy picks
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Maths not your strong point if there is a priority pick 27 becomes 28 and at the draft academy picks are clearly in play pushing that pick well into the 30's teams are fully aware that there pick will be moved back with academy picks it has occurred every yearAssuming there is an unlikely priority pick, the middle of the second round becomes 27.5. Still closer than to 27 than 35.
Academy and f/s happen AFTER trade period. Until draft night, the middle of the second round is still 27.
It's more a coaching issue of limiting out midfield rotations when we should be running deeper.Greenwood doesn't need to run out four quarters in the midfield. He's a mid/fwd whose midfield minutes have dried up.
Gibbs form turned sour no doubt. Whether being shuffled forward, back and sideways played a role here who knows.
Milera of course yes. There are only limited midfield spots and we have Crouch, Crouch and Sloane. CEY has basically soaked up the rest.
Jones has had only the briefest forays in there and looks great on the burst from stoppages. The type of speed and spread we desperately lack.
CEY has been good and his performances may indeed outweigh the positives others could have gained from time in there.
What hurts is that CEY is another player who is inside mid or nothing. Absolutely no other strings to his bow so it becomes quite a one dimensional midfield. He's (and Crouch x 2) why we can't rotate many players through there.
I don’t even know how to reply to this.Maths not your strong point if there is a priority pick 27 becomes 28 and at the draft academy picks are clearly in play pushing that pick well into the 30's teams are fully aware that there pick will be moved back with academy picks it has occurred every year
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
No wonder CEY has a sore shin if he’s filling a role that’s killing 4 players offGreenwood, Gibbs, Milera and Jones
Do the positive of CEY's good form outweigh the opportunities that have dried up for others?
They must have read your post.It's more a coaching issue of limiting out midfield rotations when we should be running deeper.
Sloane should also be playing forward... as can Brouch or off a wing at times.
When we have played our best football this year, we have played more players through the middle. Last week we kept using the same 4 players despite being killed. Just stupid coaching & it's like we don't even know what is successful.
Why ??I think they’d be crazy to let him go. I actually see him as a genuine contested marking forward that can also go into the midfield. Play him up forward next year with a proper forwards coach in charge and watch him flourish.
Who are these young kids that are strong overhead marking options that can run through the midfield?Why ??
We already have a couple young kids who we need to find a place for in that forwardline. We need genuine midfield options and as much as what he can do in there is good, it's not enough.
We have clearly recruited outside mids or very small inside onesWho are these young kids that are strong overhead marking options that can run through the midfield?
The issue is CEY is a free agent, but Greenwood isn't... so we can get more for Hugh.Talking about trading Greenwood is silly- the boy is a winner and can win a game of his own boot.
We should be looking at trading CEY instead. He is at the peak of his value after a good season and we ideally shouldn't be playing them both together.
Has CEY's emergence been a good or bad thing for the club?
I gather we are keen to get our priority players dealt with 1st, then deal with the likes of Cam.On his podcast today, said he still wants to stay in Adelaide, expected to sign a deal within the first month of the season, but didn't get an offer. Manager has a variety of backup plans lined up, didn't sound overly enthused about moving to Melbourne though.