Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I can see us trading out our remaining F2nd. MM mentioned we might take 3 picks tonight so he must have something potentially lined up.Given we just traded out around 1300 draft points tonight I am concerned our recruiting staff maybe trading out our f1 for some Magic beans…
Probably hoping that Davey gets bid on before our pick now.I can see us trading out our remaining F2nd. MM mentioned we might take 3 picks tonight so he must have something potentially lined up.
Given Phillipou went at 10, it seems obvious we chose the player the four clubs wanted to trade to get to.
That never added up to me. If it was Humphrey, then why didn't clubs ask Gold Coast for their pick? Gold Coast are known pushovers, yet clubs didn't even try.I thought most wanted to get up the draft order to grab Humphrey?
That never added up to me. If it was Humphrey, then why didn't clubs ask Gold Coast for their pick? Gold Coast are known pushovers, yet clubs didn't even try.
Also Tsatas outside run would have complimented Oliver and Petracca more than Humphrey.
It doesn't explain why clubs didn't even try.Because Gold Coast were set on Humphrey and they were always only taking one draft pick which is why they were happy to give away pick 7 for nothing and have a stack of academy players next year so don't need future first high picks.
It doesn't explain why clubs didn't even try.
It makes more sense Melbourne were after Tsatas.
That never added up to me. If it was Humphrey, then why didn't clubs ask Gold Coast for their pick? Gold Coast are known pushovers, yet clubs didn't even try.
Also Tsatas outside run would have complimented Oliver and Petracca more than Humphrey.
They did but gc wouldnt trade it because they knew hawthorn would take humphrey and gc wanted him.
Melbourne wanting Humphrey over Tsatas makes zero logic. It's more likely Tsatas is who they wanted.
Excuse my possible ignorance, but I never heard Gold Coast were even offered that deal from Melbourne.. Only Essendon were from my understanding.Fair but i wasnt commenting on that i was commenting on the fact that gc were not trading that pick (not to anyone not just melb). Melb would have had to trade up with you guys.
That's what everyone keeps assuming. But it's more likely Melbourne wanted Tsatas given they already have Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes. They need outside run. They lost Jayden Hunt too.Clubs were trying to get ahead of GCS, because they knew Gold Coast were taking Humphrey. So, if they wanted him, they needed Easendon's pick.
I don't think anyone was trying to get there to take Tsatas or Phillipou.
That's what everyone keeps assuming. But it's more likely Melbourne wanted Tsatas given they already have Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes. They need outside run. They lost Jayden Hunt too.
Where does it say Gold Coast wouldn't trade their pick? And where does it say they were even asked by Melbourne?
I don't think Melbourne asked Gold Coast because they wanted Tsatas. And he was likely not going to be there at 5.
The only established fact (from my understanding) is Melbourne wanted pick 4, they needed outside run, and that's where Tsatas was going to be.
That's what everyone keeps assuming. But it's more likely Melbourne wanted Tsatas given they already have Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes. They need outside run. They lost Jayden Hunt too.
Where does it say Gold Coast wouldn't trade their pick? And where does it say they were even asked by Melbourne?
I don't think Melbourne asked Gold Coast because they wanted Tsatas. And he was likely not going to be there at 5.
The only established fact (from my understanding) is Melbourne wanted pick 4, they needed outside run, and that's where Tsatas was going to be.
I'd be happy to do this trade (GC maybe not)
Adelaide in (GC F2, Flanders & Hollands)
Adelaide out (2023 1st & 2023 North Melbourne 2nd) - assuming Adelaide finish between 10-6 on the ladder
Flanders no doubt gets a run in our midfield and Hollands might need a change of scene to get the best out of himself as he look sot be stagnating.
GC free up a couple of list spots but at the same time get big points for matching their 3 academy bids - they could look to split the Adelaide 1st into more points too..or maybe use it to try and bundle up to get in ahead of a bid for their players (if possible)
Flanders maybe but not hollands on the form he has shown to date..but he is contracted so they don't need to do anythingReckon GC could get a late first for each of Flanders and Hollands.
Very unlikely GC give up on Hollands yet. Contracted for another year, too much talent there imo to let him go.I'd be happy to do this trade (GC maybe not)
Adelaide in (GC F2, Flanders & Hollands)
Adelaide out (2023 1st & 2023 North Melbourne 2nd) - assuming Adelaide finish between 10-6 on the ladder
Flanders no doubt gets a run in our midfield and Hollands might need a change of scene to get the best out of himself as he look sot be stagnating.
GC free up a couple of list spots but at the same time get big points for matching their 3 academy bids - they could look to split the Adelaide 1st into more points too..or maybe use it to try and bundle up to get in ahead of a bid for their players (if possible)
Hollands will be kept for another 12 months unless we get an over the odds offer for him.
Flanders and Sharp are the 2 OOC that could be likely to move on. They free up list spots while giving us a little more currency for our academy players.
Moyle and Graham are others as well that are apparently driving interest as well so we should be able to accrue enough points I would have thought.