Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5

[OneGreatClub]

Alright lets do democrats

• low testostrone
• corrupt
• pro murder of babies
• feelings over facts
• satanic
• pro exposing children to sexual content
• pro giving children hormone theropy for sex change
• divisive based on race
• pro censorship
• blow taxpayers money on woke agenda
• pro forced vaccination
• anti health that isnt pharma

You are delusional

 

[adelaidecrows]

Alright lets do democrats

• low testostrone
• corrupt
• pro murder of babies
• feelings over facts
• satanic
• pro exposing children to sexual content
• pro giving children hormone theropy for sex change
• divisive based on race
• pro censorship
• blow taxpayers money on woke agenda
• pro forced vaccination
• anti health that isnt pharma

MAGA - Advocating for sexual violence, abuse and rape of women. The advocating for pedophilia through the lack of widely accepted knowledge Trump was not only Epsteins friend but a frequent flier as well as an attendee to many of Diddys parties. For a minute, be a human and actually think, what if Trump did this to your mum, your wife or worse your child because you decided for a minute to trust them with him.

 

[AmericanCrow]

Today it was give a little talk in front of the Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee.

 

[OneGreatClub]

More degenerates have joined the Trump campaign. Russell Brandt has found Jesus conveniently after being accused of multiple rapes and now he is baptising Americans. What a ****ing sideshow no doubt anothe one edging for a Trump pardon or for rape to be just made legal if orange megalomaniac regains power.

 

[Mr_Moogle]

Fidelity has cut its estimate of X's value by 79% since Musk's purchase | TechCrunch

Elon Musk's X is now worth less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price, according to a new estimate from investor Fidelity. The asset Elon Musk's X is now valued at less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price, according to Fidelity.

techcrunch.com

 

[Cap]

Alright lets do democrats

• low testostrone
• corrupt
• pro murder of babies
• feelings over facts
• satanic
• pro exposing children to sexual content
• pro giving children hormone theropy for sex change
• divisive based on race
• pro censorship
• blow taxpayers money on woke agenda
• pro forced vaccination
• anti health that isnt pharma

satanic

Is there a less intelligent group of people in Australia than MAGA Trump fans.

these guys support a sex offender and a guy who shags couches FFS

 

[Floating Doughnut]

satanic

Is there a less intelligent group of people in Australia than MAGA Trump fans.

these guys support a sex offender and a guy who shags couches FFS

Yes, I believe they go by the acronym ABC

Gut this mob and start again .

 

[Cap]

Yes, I believe they go by the acronym ABC

Gut this mob and start again .

View attachment 2128187View attachment 2128190

yeah not seeing it.

clearly more intelligent than a Trump fan.

that being said, MAGA and Hezbollah would have more in common that different.

 

[footy4ever]

Yes, I believe they go by the acronym ABC

Gut this mob and start again .

View attachment 2128187View attachment 2128190

Agree wholeheartedly with Dutton and great to see an ABC reporter set straight.

...but if you think for an instant the ABC is dumber than MAGA, just LOL.

 

[Floating Doughnut]

Agree wholeheartedly with Dutton and great to see an ABC reporter set straight.

...but if you think for an instant the ABC is dumber than MAGA, just LOL.

Yeah you are probably right.

We’ll call it a draw.

 

[Floating Doughnut]

.

yeah not seeing it.

clearly more intelligent than a Trump fan.

that being said, MAGA and Hezbollah would have more in common that different.

Which employee of the ABC ?

The one who doctored the footage to bury a soldier with lies and can’t remember ?
The reporter who won’t now say boo .
The boss who won’t name names but wants an internal review.

Are they less intelligent, liars or just reporting bias toward a terrorist organisation ?

 

[Cap]

.


Which employee of the ABC ?

The one who doctored the footage to bury a soldier with lies and can’t remember ?
The reporter who won’t now say boo .
The boss who won’t name names but wants an internal review.

Are they less intelligent, liars or just reporting bias toward a terrorist organisation ?

The journalist without a doubt would be more intelligent than a Trump fan.

No one is suggesting using doctored footage is okay (neither are war crimes)

perhaps if we want an abc that meets our standards we shouldn't have defunded in the first place.

Edit - https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fed...r-for-hezbollah-question-20241001-p5keyy.html

I can see why you felt the need to snip a certain part of the conversation.

As usual Dutton just trying to make something out of nothing

 

[Mutineer]

.


Which employee of the ABC ?

The one who doctored the footage to bury a soldier with lies and can’t remember ?
The reporter who won’t now say boo .
The boss who won’t name names but wants an internal review.

Are they less intelligent, liars or just reporting bias toward a terrorist organisation ?

This ABC....

The ABC launched a racism review. The responses were damning

Outgoing ABC boss David Anderson has told current and former staff he is “truly sorry” after a report into systemic racism issued 15 recommendations.

www.smh.com.au

The ABC launched a racism review. The responses were damning​

"Line in the sand": ABC apologises after report slams "systemic" racism at broadcaster | TV Tonight

Report makes 15 recommendations after hearing of racial slurs, offensive comments and bullying of staff.

tvtonight.com.au

“Line in the sand”: ABC apologises after report slams “systemic” racism at broadcaster​

Report makes 15 recommendations after hearing of racial slurs, offensive comments and bullying of staff.​

ABC boss' grovelling apology over bombshell racism report

The report found racial discrimination, slurs and stereotyping were rife at the national broadcaster.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Cap]

"Line in the sand": ABC apologises after report slams "systemic" racism at broadcaster | TV Tonight

Report makes 15 recommendations after hearing of racial slurs, offensive comments and bullying of staff.

tvtonight.com.au

“Line in the sand”: ABC apologises after report slams “systemic” racism at broadcaster​

Report makes 15 recommendations after hearing of racial slurs, offensive comments and bullying of staff.​

ABC boss' grovelling apology over bombshell racism report

The report found racial discrimination, slurs and stereotyping were rife at the national broadcaster.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Its interesting you now support not doing all these things.

Racial slurs;
Derogatory and offensive comments about a person’s appearance and cultural practices;
Excluding staff from workplace opportunities or social events due to their cultural or linguistic background; d
Preventing workplace opportunities due to ‘a non-Australian’ or ‘non-Anglo’ accent;
Assuming that First Nations or CALD staff cannot report on matters relating to them/their cultural background with objectivity;
Asking a person who is First Nations or CALD to play a role for a reenactment of another Person of Colour – without asking if this is culturally appropriate;
Comments such as “diversity hire”, “you only got this job because you are Indigenous/CALD”, “you won’t lose your job because you are meeting a quota”;
Assuming someone holds a more junior role because of their racial appearance; and i. Mistaking someone for being a trespasser in the workplace.
Assumption that a person can speak for the cultural group to which they belong, at large;
Mistaken identity with people from the same cultural background;
Stereotyping for example as the so-called “subservient ethnic woman” or the “angry Black woman”;
Women of colour being described as being “bossy” in managerial positions;
Comments on food, hair, skin colour, and laughing or teasing regarding certain lunches/food;
Comments such as “Your voice/look is too Western Sydney”, “You know people out at the Western Suburbs right?”, including where assumptions are being made based on ethnicity and accent, and in ways that are speaking negatively of suburbs with typically higher populations of culturally diverse people;
Not being championed or mentored because you are not in the same cultural group as managers;
Not being considered to be impartial in reporting on a cultural group because you are from that cultural group (whether or not that person is from that cultural group);
Not having opportunities because you are considered to have been hired to only meet diversity targets, and your skills are not valued;
Being asked to do work but without acknowledgement – stories are given to White colleagues to present or to take credit;
Implying that redundancies focus on people who are not First Nations or CALD, comments said or implied, such as “your job is safe, because you are a diversity hire”;
Assumptions such as religious or ethnic background based on a name, accent or appearance; m. Assuming someone is not diverse because their name does not stereotypically suggest so;
Not having a full range of skin tones in makeup so darker people are misfitted into lighter shades.

I look forward to your new found wokeness

 

[119others]

Odds even again for election after VP debate. As a “never-trumper” I was slightly apprehensive leading into it with a Yale candidate vs The Coach. Coach was nervous and tried his best but certainly didn’t win the overall thing IMO. But landed a few good blows on health care (gosh Vance can lie with a straight face re Trump “saving” Obama-care) and abortions and esp the 2020 election result right at the end. Waltz missed some obvious “attack” opportunities vs both Vance and Trump.

Vance was surprisingly impressive with his empathetic and non confrontational demeanour. Very smart dude but - like most pollies - avoided answering many questions and will be interesting to see the fact checks over coming days

 

[adelaidecrows]

Odds even again for election after VP debate. As a “never-trumper” I was slightly apprehensive leading into it with a Yale candidate vs The Coach. Coach was nervous and tried his best but certainly didn’t win the overall thing IMO. But landed a few good blows on health care (gosh Vance can lie with a straight face re Trump “saving” Obama-care) and abortions and esp the 2020 election result right at the end. Waltz missed some obvious “attack” opportunities vs both Vance and Trump.

Vance was surprisingly impressive with his empathetic and non confrontational demeanour. Very smart dude but - like most pollies - avoided answering many questions and will be interesting to see the fact checks over coming days

Pretty good assessment. Most experts think nothing will change because of the debate. And Walz missed a lot of opportunities to land blows and many think he didnt do a great job. Well that was up until the last half an hour when he went to town on Trump and Vance with Abortion and Jan 6.

The main criticism on Vance was when he called out the moderator for fact checking him. Made him look weak but the worst thing he could have done and literally did was refuse to answer a simple question on whether he thought Trump lost the election. That was a disaster and it went down like a lead balloon.

In the end id say Walz won the debate purely on that last half n hour.

 

[119others]

But Trump is such a hideous human. Dutton is nowhere near that. In fact I find him to be quite decent.

AND not sure if Cap is equating Republican voters = LNP voters. As that’s just totally false. I have perhaps badly misinterpreted this