Nostradamus Lives Is it beyond the realms of possibility for the AFL to cover up a drug incident involving a player

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.




I told you all of this in April last year (page 1)..yet very few believed what I was saying to be true.
Name names!!!


On another note good source tells me Nathan Buckley uses ad has used performance enhancing drugs for nearly 15 years. Apparently Tania's horse like
Features have made an erection almost impossible, and nafan has a steady supply of Viagra on the go constantly.

Poor bugger...
 
No names, but those that might think this is just a 'collingwood' problem are seriously mistaken, it certainly isn't just a 'victorian' issue either.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Most people i know have taken drugs atleast once or take drugs most weekends

I would be surprised if the AFL was any different anybody that thinks different clearly does not get out much
 
Re: Is it beyond the realms of possibility for the AFL to cover up a drug incident involving a playe

I know for a fact that if a player has two strikes to his name then undertakes counselling for drug use he can get as many strikes as he likes and he will face no ramifications what-so-ever. It's a joke. So basically if you get counselling you can get on the juice every weekend get tested every week, return positive tests every week yet still face no punishment.

Well played sir...
 
There's getting on the gear for a laugh on the weekends and then there's HGH. Who knows if that will fly up?
 
I have always wondered how they think players can aim to "get bigger" in 1 pre-season as the Dons did last year? The Weapon!!! of course.
 
Well this may shed some light on any "cover up". Its not a cover up as such its medical confidentiality keeping all but the doctors & players invovled in the dark.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport...cit-drugs-policy/story-e6frepf6-1226571330136

Interesting to note that players have missed games enforced by medical officers for drug reasons, suddenly stirs up the question of why certain players missed chunks of the season for seemingly innocuous or inconsistent reasons.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Is it beyond the realms of possibility for the AFL to cover up a drug incident involving a playe

I know a player who has been caught twice, currently attends drug clinics and counselling and still goes out most weekends and gets on the gear. It's his opinion that it's pretty much impossible to get three strikes (and for it to become public). He doesn't have any mental issues, or any underlying conditions. He just loves getting on the gear on the weekend and due to the current AFL policy he will never be caught (so to speak).

I don't care what AD says publicly, the system is an absolute joke and is clearly being abused by players.

This dude has the scoops. Tell me more cool shit please.
 
Am I the only one actually reading Vlad's words?

"You don't have to be on two strikes to be forced to stop playing,'' Demetriou said.
"If a player tests positive just once and the AFL medical officers believe he needs prolonged rehabilitation, then he will not be allowed to play.''

So it's not "We banned players for positive tests". It's "if the doctors think the bloke needs help right now we won't let him play".

Very, very different. But more bullshit sensationalism from News Ltd.
 
I thought it was kinda of cool at first when our drunken speculating on this board started coming true, now it's getting all too much.

Spot on, I have no doubt now that Dusty will be charged with drug trafficking next week.

So far this summer, its the only rumour on here not to come to fruition yet
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top