There's too many journos and not enough content really if we are honest. So the minutiae of football gets inflated every week to make content.
Yes indeed - and sadly the difference here is that there ARE a lot of good stories out there waiting to be told. And in the past, journos often investigated them and created something really worth reading.
But the dollars are to be found in the eyeballs and clicks of the great unwashed who don't have the patience to read more than a couple of paragraphs, or the ability to understand anything above the most basic drivel. So we get silly, shit, baity articles.
And if you think I'm being snobby or elitist by saying most consumers of media are morons, open any article online and scroll down to the comments section (which remember, has probably had the worst stuff already moderated out) and then tell me I'm wrong.
Can remove the “AFL” from your headline.
Yes indeed - and sadly the difference here is that there ARE a lot of good stories out there waiting to be told. And in the past, journos often investigated them and created something really worth reading.
But the dollars are to be found in the eyeballs and clicks of the great unwashed who don't have the patience to read more than a couple of paragraphs, or the ability to understand anything above the most basic drivel. So we get silly, shit, baity articles.
And if you think I'm being snobby or elitist by saying most consumers of media are morons, open any article online and scroll down to the comments section (which remember, has probably had the worst stuff already moderated out) and then tell me I'm wrong.