Don't you think Ginnivan would fare better if he just reined in the mayo, and gave up those pleading looks at the umpires?
Sure, but then so would just about every other player in the AFL that does the same thing when they've been hit in the head.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Don't you think Ginnivan would fare better if he just reined in the mayo, and gave up those pleading looks at the umpires?
Yes. The reality is that umpires do a lot of guessing based on the player's reaction to contact and they've learnt to not trust his reaction because he's constantly throwing himself to the ground.Don't you think Ginnivan would fare better if he just reined in the mayo, and gave up those pleading looks at the umpires?
Sure, but then so would just about every other player in the AFL that does the same thing when they've been hit in the head.
Yes. The reality is that umpires do a lot of guessing based on the player's reaction to contact and they've learnt to not trust his reaction because he's constantly throwing himself to the ground.
They haven’t. The announcement today is exactly as razor ray described the rule last week.Well, they’ve changed the interpretation so now we’ll see how many tricks Ginnivan has.
They haven’t. The announcement today is exactly as razor ray described the rule last week.
It's not a ruling at all it's pure vilification.In theory you’re right but they apparently are human so thinking comes into it and the AFL loves nothing more than a grey area.
That said Jack knows the ruling now, even if it’s wrong so should be able to focus on winning the ball and kicking goals.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
That would be a good way to lose a lot of money and end your career as the greatest laughing stock to have ever played the game.If I was Jack Ginnivan, I would be engaging a good lawyer and compiling a file of examples, including the umpires names, of all of the incidents where the rules are applied differently to his head compared to other players. I would continue to add to it until he is forced from the game by the AFL and then commence the legal battle for compensation. 10 years of lost earnings plus reputational damage and perhaps injury should add up to a bit. And what great publicity for the AFL.
Are you a poet?Ginnivan was forced to go to his back pocket and look for a few other tricks.
And he had them.
And I liked it.
Nobody likes players that milk frees.
The umpires have been told to make him earn them (clearly).
The AFL control umpires.
Umpires control the game.
The AFL control the game.
The AFL are challenging Ginnivan.
He’s already at the cross roads.
The game is already asking Ginnivan questions.
In the second half he had answers.
Good on him.
This is the new direction ahead.
Stop flopping for frees.
Today he showed, in a very tough game, that he doesn’t have to rely on flopping.
He can produce more.
You are such a flogI hope he hasn't lost his resume, might need it very soon.
Et tu, Lefty!?Not entirely on your own. Others share your view or the sentiment of it.
However, keep to dark corners, lest you find yourself theatrically stabbed by many and left a crumpled heap like Caesar.
It's most certainly a shame that his career is fast becoming defined by the issue of playing for free kicks.
You made the ignore list!Not entirely on your own. Others share your view or the sentiment of it.
However, keep to dark corners, lest you find yourself theatrically stabbed by many and left a crumpled heap like Caesar.
It's most certainly a shame that his career is fast becoming defined by the issue of playing for free kicks.
Cox should also engage Amnesty International to have the AFL up on war crimes for letting opponents chop his arms all the time. Or we could just settle the f down.If I was Jack Ginnivan, I would be engaging a good lawyer and compiling a file of examples, including the umpires names, of all of the incidents where the rules are applied differently to his head compared to other players. I would continue to add to it until he is forced from the game by the AFL and then commence the legal battle for compensation. 10 years of lost earnings plus reputational damage and perhaps injury should add up to a bit. And what great publicity for the AFL.
I don't think he did actually make it.You made the ignore list!
I don't think he did actually make it.
In the end, he just isn't worthy.
You will only know for sure if and when you receive a reply from the great man.If the man himself should feel that my posts are still worthy enough of his attention, then that's good enough for me.
You will only know for sure if and when you receive a reply from the great man.
I hope he hasn't lost his resume, might need it very soon.
He's a great finisher around goals, but he hasn't shown much of an ability to get those chances without free kicks. This season he would be operating at about 5-6 touches a game without any free kicks, that's extremely poor.You are buying into the one trick storyline?
More strings to his bow than goaling from free kicks.
You're turning his possessions gained by free kick (which he generates by being first to the footy...) into non-possessions. Your analysis, once again, is nonsenseHe's a great finisher around goals, but he hasn't shown much of an ability to get those chances without free kicks. This season he would be operating at about 5-6 touches a game without any free kicks, that's extremely poor.