NMBB
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 3, 2021
- 8,849
- 14,541
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
and a neck....... so he is short one free kick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
and a neck....... so he is short one free kick.
He was getting better and better at it and getting high contact 3 times a game by mid season last year. His technique and awareness was so good that he'd be tackled 5 times in a game and 3 would be highIt's not decreasing his high tackles only decreased his free's for stat.
People make supposedly definitive statements about the amount of frees he gets. In 2022, the following free kicks were given
Ginnivan got 30 free kicks in 20 games,
Breust got 33 in 21 games,
Papley got 16 in 16 games.
Pickett got 12 in 21 games.
Rozee got 29 in 22 games
Cody Weightman got 21 in 20 games
Izak Rankine got 16 in 18 games
Michael Walters got 27 in 19 games
Tyson Stengle got 15 in 22 games
Zac Bailey got 11 in 22 games
Charlie Cameron got 19 in 22 games
Ben Ainsworth got 22 in 21 games
I got bored at this stage. I know Ginnivan has a strategy of trying to get free kicks and depending on what you think of him, it's either working or not working. If some of the guys that I mentioned have similar strategies, I cant see a trend.
3 each so 6 in total. May not have been for high so might be a pointless stat.hill and mcreery have received 3 free each kicks in 10 games. ginnivan has got one in 6 games but you could argue that he has played less than half the others game time...
so he is short one free kick.
I cannot understand the rationale behind the thinking that it will better if he gets less high frees paid when surely the complete opposite has occurred ,because he definitely is getting high tackled and because people do not get pinged for it they will do it all more.This is what we have last season and so far this season why would they change if no is going one to penalise them and if the umpires do nothing then it is up to his team mates to help him. They should have went for Redmond when he did it last year,it has made an easier target there ,s no doubt about that.It's not decreasing his high tackles only decreased his free's for stat.
I cannot understand the rationale behind the thinking that it will better if he gets less high frees paid when surely the complete opposite has occurred ,because he definitely is getting high tackled and because people do not get pinged for it they will do it all more.This is what we have last season and so far this season why would they change if no is going one to penalise them and if the umpires do nothing then it is up to his team mates to help him. They should have went for Redmond when he did it last year,it has made an easier target there ,s no doubt about that.
He was getting better and better at it and getting high contact 3 times a game by mid season last year. His technique and awareness was so good that he'd be tackled 5 times in a game and 3 would be high
Exactly. And Beau has played every game this year. Bobby has played more than Ginni. Jack has been a sub at least a couple of times in those 6 matches.3 each so 6 in total. May not have been for high so might be a pointless stat.
As an aside McCreery has given away 14.
Exactly. And Beau has played every game this year. Bobby has played more than Ginni. Jack has been a sub at least a couple of times in those 6 matches.
3 each so 6 in total. May not have been for high so might be a pointless stat.
As an aside McCreery has given away 14.
Lol I can’t believe people are even trying to argue it.
and a neck
Last year when they were paying the frees people think he should be paid, he wasn't trying to evade the tackler, he was making a bee line for the tackler and trying and succeeding in getting taken high. Paying those frees wasn't protecting the head, it was encouraging him to get taken high and others to copy his technique and get taken highBecause he was driving into the tackler with his head and body on a near horizontal whilst dropping the knee.
We aren’t talking about only that particular technique but ALL ways he tries to extricate himself from the tackle or evade or other.
Last year when they were paying the frees people think he should be paid, he wasn't trying to evade the tackler, he was making a bee line for the tackler and trying and succeeding in getting taken high. Paying those frees wasn't protecting the head, it was encouraging him to get taken high and others to copy his technique and get taken high
Don't like being fact checked?
Well your free kicks for were wrong as I posted and as to the rest of your post have no idea what you are on about.actually i didnt research the free kicks against. I just provided free kicks for info....
but generally speaking, I love the attention I get in fact checking.
i'm planning to get in touch with Julie and get her to front a campaign...her son is being crucified. I need to see the video of her dealing with the AFL execs...
Probably not too surprising given that he goes at opponents like a feral attack dog with rabies! He's a terrier!I cant believe the mccreery free kicks against!!!....has he got a lawyer yet?? i'm organising a march to parliament...
Well your free kicks for were wrong as I posted and as to the rest of your post have no idea what you are on about.
Probably not too surprising given that he goes at opponents like a feral attack dog with rabbis! He's a terrier!
Me neither, but it does sound intriguing. But, thank you for pointing out my terrible typing, I have amended the atrocity!!i've never seen a feral attack dog accompanied by several jewish rabbis, but it does sound scary....
Me neither, but it does sound intriguing. But, thank you for pointing out my terrible typing, I have amended the atrocity!!
It’s actully not all about Jack and his health.Last year when they were paying the frees people think he should be paid, he wasn't trying to evade the tackler, he was making a bee line for the tackler and trying and succeeding in getting taken high. Paying those frees wasn't protecting the head, it was encouraging him to get taken high and others to copy his technique and get taken high
In the middle of last year, his technique was getting 3 high tackles a game, plus a punch in the head every second week because it was pissing opponents off so much. This year, I think there's been 3 high tackles not paid to Jack. One with the old technique. This latest one that just looked like a Selwood classic to me and one that he should have definitely got, but didn't.I cannot understand the rationale behind the thinking that it will better if he gets less high frees paid when surely the complete opposite has occurred ,because he definitely is getting high tackled and because people do not get pinged for it they will do it all more.This is what we have last season and so far this season why would they change if no is going one to penalise them and if the umpires do nothing then it is up to his team mates to help him. They should have went for Redmond when he did it last year,it has made an easier target there ,s no doubt about that.
Last year when they were paying the frees people think he should be paid, he wasn't trying to evade the tackler, he was making a bee line for the tackler and trying and succeeding in getting taken high. Paying those frees wasn't protecting the head, it was encouraging him to get taken high and others to copy his technique and get taken high