Jai Serong = Anti-vaxxer

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Maybe he was legitimately exempt due to a health condition?
Like... heart issues?

It's bottom of the barrel stupidity to even bring up vaccinations in relation to this.
 
Chief can you please answer this one question.

Why did the Federal Government give the vaccine manufactures full Indemnity ( full protection from be held liable from any injures from their product ) ?

This has been going on for years. Pfizer's moral compass or lack of would astound people if they dug deep into what they have done in the USA and Mexico.
 
This has been going on for years. Pfizer's moral compass or lack of would astound people if they dug deep into what they have done in the USA and Mexico.
True, I've asked many pro vaxxers this question, yet none of them will answer or give any justification . I guess they can't comprehend what Full Indemnity actually means.

Funny isn't it

Federal Government buys vaccines with tax payers money and gives Full Indemnity to vaccine manufactures
State Governments Mandate jab - Federal government doesn't
Federal Government introduces a compensation scheme for injuries ( more than 6 months after rollout of vaccines )
Tax Payers foot the bill for vaccine injuries

Who is really winning here ????

Hmm. yes I guess this will go over some peoples heads. or they just don't want to admit that Big Pharma is a protected species

And add to the fact that Doctors were warned not to discourage people from taking the jabs or they could be investigated and not allowed to practice .
TGA keeps data from general public that contradicts statements made by Health experts saying the Spike Cells don't spread into all organs.

But hey lets all just forget about what happened between 2020-2022

Who cares about all the people who suffered under the policies introduced by the likes of Dan Andrews .
And the pro vaxxers out there think they are still right. they are the problem. personally I think they are the selfish bast*rds
 
True, I've asked many pro vaxxers this question, yet none of them will answer or give any justification . I guess they can't comprehend what Full Indemnity actually means.

Funny isn't it

Federal Government buys vaccines with tax payers money and gives Full Indemnity to vaccine manufactures
State Governments Mandate jab - Federal government doesn't
Federal Government introduces a compensation scheme for injuries ( more than 6 months after rollout of vaccines )
Tax Payers foot the bill for vaccine injuries

Who is really winning here ????

Hmm. yes I guess this will go over some peoples heads. or they just don't want to admit that Big Pharma is a protected species

And add to the fact that Doctors were warned not to discourage people from taking the jabs or they could be investigated and not allowed to practice .
TGA keeps data from general public that contradicts statements made by Health experts saying the Spike Cells don't spread into all organs.

But hey lets all just forget about what happened between 2020-2022

Who cares about all the people who suffered under the policies introduced by the likes of Dan Andrews .
And the pro vaxxers out there think they are still right. they are the problem. personally I think they are the selfish bast*rds

I'm not anti vax but I didn't like being told I'd lose my job if I didn't get vaxed. The government forced me to take to jabs or I'd be unemployed.

And now that rule doesn't apply even though there's still covid. Maybe covid isn't as terrifying as what the state run media made it out to be during the get vaxed campaign in 2021 2022. Makes you wonder
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Chief can you please answer this one question.

Why did the Federal Government give the vaccine manufactures full Indemnity ( full protection from be held liable from any injures from their product ) ?
I do not know:

a) That they actually did,
b) If they did what the actual terms are,
c) The reasoning behind any decision in this area.

I do know that I'm not going to go learn about it from some kook's Substack or Rumble channel. I'm really not.
 
I do not know:

a) That they actually did,
b) If they did what the actual terms are,
c) The reasoning behind any decision in this area.

I do know that I'm not going to go learn about it from some kook's Substack or Rumble channel. I'm really not.

They did. It's a fact
 
Last edited:
Maybe another day.

Why is it important to you?

I'll try find the link when not at work

Government regulations try and reduce meth labs in the states so they restrict the sales of over the counter cold and flu tablets for those who don't need them. Pfizer heads over to Mexico with looser regulations and people from the states stock up huge quantities then get them back into the country.

Anything for profit
 
I'll try find the link when not at work

Government regulations try and reduce meth labs in the states so they restrict the sales of over the counter cold and flu tablets for those who don't need them. Pfizer heads over to Mexico with looser regulations and people from the states stock up huge quantities then get them back into the country.

Anything for profit
I don't know what that has to do with vaccines.

Can we take it as an agreed fact that pharmaceutical companies are scummy?
 
Pfizer had a large share in covid 19 vaccines world wide. A non trustworthy company
And the response is: look at the data from across the globe.

These vaccines are the most monitored vaccines in history.

You'd be better off asking why x, y, or z drug gets such an easy ride to authorisation than single out vaccines.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Jai Serong = Anti-vaxxer

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top