Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not something you can boast about.Again with the personal bullshit. I'm a self-made man, so I guess I'm the latter, but I don't see why I couldn't be both.
I can't stop you burying your head in the sand, but if you decide you want to look beyond journalistic bias, try explaining away the following:
- $2749 in the bank after expenses paid
- At the limit of your debt facility
- Failed to win the bid to play in Launceston
- Still no deal to play in Hobart
- Failed to consult the Liberals to guarantee the Ballarat stadium upgrade
- Auditors expressing 'significant doubt' over your continuing existence
- A loss of over $1 million without the ASD handout
- Current assets of only $565,000 to cover current liabilities of $2 million
Is that all too 'unremarkable' for you to address?
P.S. That's pretty much what was in The Age, minus the vitriol.
EFA. It's a different story down the track when a dependant source of revenue is threatened, and the only other option is to fold.
Still doesn't stop Brayshaw leaving names off or threatening legal action, does it. I'm sure it will be a 'computer bug' next time, if he's feeling sufficiently threatened.
Any legitimate opposition has probably been scared off by now though, knowing the legal threats and personal attacks in store.
10K would probably do, given the opposition you would play there. I was just saying the Dogs won't need it because we are still attracting upwards of 25k against the worst drawing interstate teams.
Learnt what exactly? Not to ask for more per game than the incumbent if they want a chance of winning the tender?
This is only the beginning of the Ballarat and Hobart sagas.
They're OK. There's plenty of better targets for on-field stuff. Off-field though, there has not been a greater shambles in the history of the AFL. Carlton, Richmond and Melbourne have been far worse on-field this past decade, and yet you are so far behind them in the support & finance stakes it isn't funny.
You think having a media personality in charge somehow guarantees your future, I think he's got no idea what he is doing.
No offence guys but what sort of a life do you have if you spend all night arguing about shit like this?
Not something you can boast about.
Summary : NMFC is in debt.
It's not something for North fans to celebrate, but it's hardly news.
I am surprised that a Dogs fan would want to sustain the myth that the ASD payment is a handout.
Higher revenue yet folding? Goes together like Dogs and flag.
And funny how it's only Caro and you that seem to currently have a problem with this. If the club chooses to keep it's white knights off the board for now they must have good reason. JBFTW.
Once the Ballarat deal occurs North will well and truly be the masters of their own destiny.
If the Dogs don't win the flag this year, you may find the broken supporter base goes back into it's shell. Just sayin.
Yes, there are 2 major sources of financial security hovering over the NMFC landscape and the haters know there's a much bigger brew a brewing for a club who some take great pleasure in seeing on struggle street.
Your delusion is high oh wise arsehopper.
This is where your and Caroswine's jealousy kicks in. Both irrelevant stooges just cannot handle it. Anyway, this debate is only a rung up from playing verbal babysitter to the mighty doosh, cbefkd.
Why am I not surprised that you spent your holidays obsessively reading the North board?How did you really feel when you first read the article? I know the answer, because I read it on the North board, but I can't quote it and I want to see whether you are man enough to admit it.
How is that not offensive?
It's true - you haven't been that bad on field. Carlton, Richmond and Melbourne have barely played a final in the last decade, yet they are kicking your arse in membership, attendances and finances
Why am I not surprised that you spent your holidays obsessively reading the North board?
My reaction wasn't inconsistent with anything I've since said on the Bay.
I saw the headlines and read the report, and thought : FFS, are we in THAT much trouble?
Then I remembered that Hawthorne had done some 'witty' North trolling on the back-page sports column last year, and realised he was most likely doing Caro's dirty work for her. The club's response reassured me that, while North does face serious financial problems, the situation is not as desperate or terminal as Hawthorne was trying to make out.
Current ratio
This is the difference between current assets and current liabilities. The current ratio (CR) is calculated by dividing current assets (CA) by the current liabilities (CL) listed on your balance sheet:
Current Assets / Current Liabilities = Current Ratio
Say your current assets are $34,000
Your liabilities are $18,000
Your current ratio would therefore be:
CA / CL = CR
$34,000 / $18,000 = 1.9
Therefore your current ratio = 1.9 : 1
This means for every dollar you owe you have $1.90 available in current assets. A current ratio of assets to liabilities of 2:1 is usually considered to be acceptable (ie., your assets are twice your liabilities).
Does it irk you that Caro & Hawthorne actually get paid for trolling North, while you put in so many hours at it for free?
Was just an inquiry/question that's all.
What are you talking about Melbourne played finals in 2000, 2002, 2004,2005 and 2006. That's 5 out of the last 11 years.
By club I take it you mean JB Mugabe? I guess this is an admission that the club did manipulate the election process to ensure a preferable outcome as decided by the club and not the members.....And funny how it's only Caro and you that seem to currently have a problem with this. If the club chooses to keep it's white knights off the board for now they must have good reason.
By club I take it you mean JB Mugabe? I guess this is an admission that the club did manipulate the election process to ensure a preferable outcome as decided by the club and not the members.....
If Norf fans want a Benevolent Dictatorship (questionable given JB Mugabe's ego and motivations) that's fine- it's a system which may work and one I'd probably prefer for Norf given the number of brain dead bogans that support them. Just don't pretend it's a democracy and that the general populace will be so easily fooled.Shit, I didn't even pick up on that. Guess I'm just used the idea now.
If Norf fans want a Benevolent Dictatorship (questionable given JB Mugabe's ego and motivations) that's fine- it's a system which may work and one I'd probably prefer for Norf given the number of brain dead bogans that support them. Just don't pretend it's a democracy and that the general populace will be so easily fooled.
Benevolent being the questionable part of the post. I do get the feeling his ambition and motivation to save Norf are more about power, prestige and personal gain rather than a love of the club and what's really best for it.Me thinks you need to check the definition of benevolent. Taking away home games and voting rights does not fit the bill.
Good call. I mean, he's made a lot more money and had a lot less stress in his life since taking the job on...and he hasn't copped any flak at all.Benevolent being the questionable part of the post. I do get the feeling his ambition and motivation to save Norf are more about power, prestige and personal gain rather than a love of the club and what's really best for it.
Will he do a similar hatchet job on any other club that receives extra ASD funding? or has qualifying statements from the auditors in its financial report? or runs down the level of cash in its bank account at any stage?
By club I take it you mean JB Mugabe? I guess this is an admission that the club did manipulate the election process to ensure a preferable outcome as decided by the club and not the members.....
Do you honestly believe only a couple of people care? Plenty of Norf fans are worried about the way this was handled and your current financial situation. To pretend it's all rosy at Norf is the very definition of Deluded.
The search for an honest Norf fan (or board member) continues.
I noticed that. But am I being paranoid when I wonder why Carlton's debt situation warrants half a dozen pars, 3 pages into the sports section, when North's was worth a front-page mention, a splash all over the front page of the sports section,and a follow-up opinion piece the next day?He's now pretending Carlton's debt to be reviewed in October is due to be repaid by then
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...m-to-be-repaid-by-october-20110225-1b8um.html
I noticed that. But am I being paranoid when I wonder why Carlton's debt situation warrants half a dozen pars, 3 pages into the sports section, when North's was worth a front-page mention, a splash all over the front page of the sports section,and a follow-up opinion piece the next day?
Good descriptions Bosk." a mouthpiece who knows how to get his face on the telly"
"of this 2nd-rate media hack."
Good descriptions Bosk.
Norf fans don't see through the rose coloured glasses but it would be akin to Geelong voting Billy Brownless as President of the GFC. The only real difference is JB Mugabe's ego is so needy he'd kick his grandma in the teeth for exposure. That's why we laugh Norf.
Did Eddie ever wear a mankini on TFS?Brayshaw's failure to close either the Tassie or Ballarat deals should've woken up Norf's members to the fact this shallow, airheaded Eddie clone is too much of a political lightweight to follow through on his promised pipedreams and is only going to lead the club even further down the toilet.
Why does Bosk give a sh't about JB Mugabe?
Is Bosk a real Whorethorn supporter?
I detect a bit of Kenneth in Bosk.
So you're openly calling Brayshaw Mugabe now eh?
Excellent. Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery.