- Sep 26, 2004
- 47,652
- 64,499
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #1,314
Infractions and thread bans have been handed out.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
This does ring a bellDepends if the rules are adjusted for tenure, which is a possibility.
May only need to be $800-$850k in that case.
Looks like Band 1 coming for the Saints, they should be pulling the contract offer tomorrow in all honesty for a guy that's pretty much a poor mans Stephen May.
They can rebuild their midfield with Pick 4 & 5.
No idea but would seem dumb if they tried that given Shiel/Bryan are not exactly enormous spuds and given their wage value are easily worth those 2 picksdidnt they try similar stunt with to stkilda last year but that got rejected? word around here anyway.
Think the issue is simply really.
North trade Pick 21 + future 2nd to Essendon for Dylan Shiel and Nick Bryan. Essendon then pick up Cam Zurhaar on 6 year 6 mill deal which they can slightly frontload on the back of losing Shiel and Nick Bryans contract
This can push Zurhaars contract down to more or less a 6/4.8 mill deal
North then get pick 2 as compensation meaning the deal is
Pick 2 out of thin air + Shiel + Bryan for Pick 21, Future 2nd + Zurhaar
Band 1 is crazy.
I'd be pissed if I was teams like the crows
You sick bastardThink the issue is simply really.
North trade Pick 21 + future 2nd to Essendon for Dylan Shiel and Nick Bryan. Essendon then pick up Cam Zurhaar on 6 year 6 mill deal which they can slightly frontload on the back of losing Shiel and Nick Bryans contract
This can push Zurhaars contract down to more or less a 6/4.8 mill deal
North then get pick 2 as compensation meaning the deal is
Pick 2 out of thin air + Shiel + Bryan for Pick 21, Future 2nd + Zurhaar
To be fair, it wasn't a great year for top class midfielders outside of Andrew Brayshaw, LDU and Cerra (who were all taken above those two).This does ring a bell
Coffield & Hunter Clarke
Band 1 is crazy.
I'd be pissed if I was teams like the crows
Pissed? we're fuming if we finish above Saints and a hack like Battle reaps the Saints Band 1.
Seriously, the AFL needs to tighten up FA compo, McKay on a two year contract was a joke, just to reward North even more
How is it the Saints fault Hawthorn is offering a 6 year deal worth 800+k a year?!?It's just like last year with McKay.
Band 1 is suggested and everyone agrees that is absurd. Totally ridiculous.
Then the AFL media talk about it on and on all the time. By the time the absurd idea becomes reality, people have been conditioned to think it is fair.
How is it the Saints fault Hawthorn is offering a 6 year deal worth 800+k a year?!?
When there is comments like a “hack like Battle” or “media talking it up to condition people” or “band 1 is crazy” it’s implied that the Saints are taking the piss here as it isn’t fair their clubs will get pushed back.Who said it is St Kilda’s fault?
When there is comments like a “hack like Battle” or “media talking it up to condition people” or “band 1 is crazy” it’s implied that the Saints are taking the piss here as it isn’t fair their clubs will get pushed back.
Instead of people moaning about the compensation. Moan about the Hawks trying to blow copious amounts of cap space on players like McKay Perryman and Battle.
When there is comments like a “hack like Battle” or “media talking it up to condition people” or “band 1 is crazy” it’s implied that the Saints are taking the piss here as it isn’t fair their clubs will get pushed back.
Instead of people moaning about the compensation. Moan about the Hawks trying to blow copious amounts of cap space on players like McKay Perryman and Battle.
He also said the deal is 6 years and it would be very close.Cal twomey said deal will have to be close to 900k per year to get band 1
Because our moron list manager at the time front loaded his last 2 year dealApologies is this has already been answered, but how did it happen that Josh Battle wasn't in the top 25% of players paid in the year he hit free agency?
He also said the deal is 6 years and it would be very close.
The saints offer in round 2 was 6/800.
Last I heard both clubs sat at around 6/850 now.
That will trigger band 1 when overlayed with age
Because our moron list manager at the time front loaded his last 2 year deal
It’s only a favour if we land band 1.List manager maybe a moron but he did you a favour
It’s only a favour if we land band 1.
He is a moron as we don’t have control of the situation
He didn’t mention it for Battle. Just Martin.Reckon hawks would have to bump that offer up. Cal would be factoring in age and years
I think he ends up going and it’s Band 1.It will be very close ….If terms are as they where last year I reckon you get it.
If terms include pay increase I reckon you will just miss it. Unless Josh is offered more.
It will be very close ….If terms are as they where last year I reckon you get it.
If terms include pay increase I reckon you will just miss it. Unless Josh is offered more.
Even if he lands at 850k guaranteed.Given the list of points only considers players in his age range with existing contracts there may not yet be players on the new salary cap money yet, or not as many as there will be by end of next season.
I have no doubt the clubs are working together to get the best result. Josh wouldnt screw the club over. Him and his managed will be making sure we get maximum compo.The system is so open to manipulate surely hawks and saints do a deal for band one and another deal where hawks get some kind of later pick upgrade. I’m happy for 2 of the lower vic clubs to give each other a helping hand.