Judd's Dog act will Spark the Eagles Slide....

[Independent Observer]

It's got nothing to do with "WA bias", the reports are exactly the same all over the country.

Face it, people are more likely to go easy on Judd, as like his team mates he is a ball player.

On the other hand a scummy, dirty team like Freo are going to be treated more harshly by the media because of the reputation they've built for themselves.

As Clinton Grybus said last week, at the time Fremantle had 14 suspensions handed out, including dirty acts such as tripping, stomping and eye gouging. Every other team in the comp had 14 between them.

So stop whinging Freo f@gs. You've made your bed, now lie in it

What?

What has Fremantles tribunal record got to do with this incident. Who cares if Judd is a ball player, he needs to get cited because he had his fingers in another players eyes.

It is a reportable incident and the fact that the players name is Chris Judd has nothing to do with it. It was a low act.

His second such act and both have come when he has been struggling.

 

[Dippers_Mullet]

Perhaps.

But unlike your Dockers, the Eagles will play finals.

And your spot in the bottom 8 will be cemented after next friday night.

What a great contribution to a clever and interesting thread.

No doubt the ideas at play went right over your head, as was represented by your stupid reply.

 

[xyakks]

I'd rather have Judd try to poke my eyes out than Kerr punch my nutts. Since Kerr got off, then I'd reckon Judd would be safe.

Kerr nutpunch (Mitchell) >>>>> Judd Eyegouge (Brown)

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

I'd rather have Judd try to poke my eyes out than Kerr punch my nutts. Since Kerr got off, then I'd reckon Judd would be safe.

Kerr nutpunch (Mitchell) >>>>> Judd Eyegouge (Brown)

I thought Kerr got a week, but so many people have said he got off that I'm starting to doubt my own memory...

 

[ams4crows]

What?

What has Fremantles tribunal record got to do with this incident. Who cares if Judd is a ball player, he needs to get cited because he had his fingers in another players eyes.

It is a reportable incident and the fact that the players name is Chris Judd has nothing to do with it. It was a low act.

His second such act and both have come when he has been struggling.

Spot on Just because his name is Chris Judd doesn't mean he can get off Scott Free I can gaurentee that if say a Byron Pickett or a Jeff Farmer did the exact same thing they'd get 6 weeks! because it's Judd he'll get off which is a disgrace! there's pressure from the media to let him off as well

 

[JKCeagle]

This is the most blatant case of media bias this state has scene for a while in terms of a sporting incident.

Your atrocious spelling and grammar is causing a scene...

 

[Kram]

Clever.

 

[sydney eagle]

Spot on Just because his name is Chris Judd doesn't mean he can get off Scott Free I can gaurentee that if say a Byron Pickett or a Jeff Farmer did the exact same thing they'd get 6 weeks! because it's Judd he'll get off which is a disgrace! there's pressure from the media to let him off as well

Well if Jeff Farmer did the exact same thing it would not be his first such offence so he would deserve a longer sentence !

 

[Pav for AA]

Well, isnt it funny how the world turns. Judd is cleared after clearly sticking his fingers in the eye of Brown.

It is clear as day.

Farmer commits a similar act and gets 6. Granted his previous effortd extended the sentence. He deserved to go and he did.

Judd deserved to go and he didnt. Johnson went for 4 weeks, for what?

If this wasnt so sad it would be hilarious.

Let's hope the footy Gods restore some order and the Roos pump West Coast.

Anyone that suggests Judd didnt have his fngers in the eyes of Brown after seeing the footage should be declared mentally unstable.

I am gobsmacked. This is one of the bigger disgraces I have ever witnessed at the Tribunal.

 

[RECORDS!]

Well, isnt it funny how the world turns. Judd is cleared after clearly sticking his fingers in the eye of Brown.

It is clear as day.

Farmer commits a similar act and gets 6. Granted his previous effortd extended the sentence. He deserved to go and he did.

Judd deserved to go and he didnt. Johnson went for 4 weeks, for what?

If this wasnt so sad it would be hilarious.

Let's hope the footy Gods restore some order and the Roos pump West Coast.

Anyone that suggests Judd didnt have his fngers in the eyes of Brown after seeing the footage should be declared mentally unstable.

I am gobsmacked. This is one of the bigger disgraces I have ever witnessed at the Tribunal.

You are just upset that your thead is no longer relevant, kinda like you

 

[Pav for AA]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

 

[royalist]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

Good evening Pimple. I would just like to ask you, Can you tell me the last time you gave any positves to EVILS?

 

[Pav for AA]

Good evening Pimple. I would just like to ask you, Can you tell me the last time you gave any positves to EVILS?

Did you look at the picture I posted?

How did the kids like your boiled lollies?

 

[mick ryan]

Well, isnt it funny how the world turns. Judd is cleared after clearly sticking his fingers in the eye of Brown.

It is clear as day.

Farmer commits a similar act and gets 6. Granted his previous effortd extended the sentence. He deserved to go and he did.

Judd deserved to go and he didnt. Johnson went for 4 weeks, for what?

If this wasnt so sad it would be hilarious.

Let's hope the footy Gods restore some order and the Roos pump West Coast.

Anyone that suggests Judd didnt have his fngers in the eyes of Brown after seeing the footage should be declared mentally unstable.

I am gobsmacked. This is one of the bigger disgraces I have ever witnessed at the Tribunal.

You need help mate, just accept that Judd has been found not guilty by far more intelligent people than you.

 

[Independent Observer]

You need help mate, just accept that Judd has been found not guilty by far more intelligent people than you.

Tell that to the masses on the main Page of bigfooty. Would normally agree with you, but Judd was very, very lucky.

 

[JamesM]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

Do you have a higher resolution picture? I can't see shit from that one

 

[Independent Observer]

Do you have a higher resolution picture? I can't see shit from that one

I can see Judd with his finger in Browns eye and Mitchell pointing it out to the umpire.

Does that help. BTW I took the Liberty of using Pav's picture to see the reaction on the main page.

 

[royalist]

Did you look at the picture I posted?

How did the kids like your boiled lollies?

Now Pimple , don't deflect. I'll ask you again in a different way. Have you said anything positive about the EVILS? Simple question . Even you should be able to answer it.

 

[Independent Observer]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

That's the post you replied to, why didnt you answer the initial question you quoted?

 

[kane249]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

Simple question, if Judds fingers were really in Browns eye, would mitchell stand around and point asking for a free kick? or go in and help out his team mate and get the other guys fingers out of his team mates eye?

No self respecting AFL player would stand around appealing for a free kick while a team mate was in trouble like that. The fact Mitchell was more concerned about foxking for a free kick then worrying about his team mate is an indication Mitchell didn't think there was anything sinister in what was going on either.

 

[Barabbas]

You tell me what Sam Mitchell is pointing to in this picture?

Now tell me where Judd's fingers are?

This is a farce

Well. A footballer pointed at something. That's your proof right there. Forget the video evidence the man is pointing.

 

[ditto]

Anyone that suggests Judd didnt have his fngers in the eyes of Brown after seeing the footage should be declared mentally unstable.

Well for a start there was Brown himself, the umpire and Judd. So there's 3 people you've declared mentally unstable.

And what was it that you called Nisbett after he said something similar re Gardiner last year??? "......the man without a soul" I believe it was. So what does that make you??

But since all of this is coming from the all knowing "Pavlova for Brains" it must be true.

 

[Pav for AA]

Well for a start there was Brown himself, the umpire and Judd. So there's 3 people you've declared mentally unstable.

And what was it that you called Nisbett after he said something similar re Gardiner last year??? "......the man without a soul" I believe it was. So what does that make you??

But since all of this is coming from the all knowing "Pavlova for Brains" it must be true.

Unlike Nissy I never singled out anyone person and made an unsubstantiated claim against that person. Against their will, to better serve the interest of the Franchise I was representing at the cost of the individuals reputation.

But hey, you clutch at straws all you want pal, that Nissy Fella, what a guy

We both know that a man accused of a crime pleading not guilty will say anything to get himself off, Campbell and Judd are good mates, he'll look after his mate, the umpire, he's an umpire.

Forget everything that has been said and answer the question on what you saw and what you saw alone. Where were Judd's Fingers and what were they doing?

 

[royalist]

Unlike Nissy I never singled out anyone person and made an unsubstantiated claim against that person. Against their will, to better serve the interest of the Franchise I was representing at the cost of the individuals reputation.

But hey, you clutch at straws all you want pal, that Nissy Fella, what a guy

We both know that a man accused of a crime pleading not guilty will say anything to get himself off, Campbell and Judd are good mates, he'll look after his mate, the umpire, he's an umpire.

Forget everything that has been said and answer the question on what you saw and what you saw alone. Where were Judd's Fingers and what were they doing?

OH MY GAWD. He's still going on. It makes me think Pimple, that you have vested interest in this. I can't wait for the druggies v crims game.

 

[Toots Hibbert]

Unlike Nissy I never singled out anyone person and made an unsubstantiated claim against that person. Against their will, to better serve the interest of the Franchise I was representing at the cost of the individuals reputation.

But hey, you clutch at straws all you want pal, that Nissy Fella, what a guy

We both know that a man accused of a crime pleading not guilty will say anything to get himself off, Campbell and Judd are good mates, he'll look after his mate, the umpire, he's an umpire.

Forget everything that has been said and answer the question on what you saw and what you saw alone. Where were Judd's Fingers and what were they doing?

And good mates poke each other in the eye.