Remove this Banner Ad

Unfortunately, the 250k reward does not appear to cover situations where someone provides WA Police with info that leads to solving this suspicious missing persons cold case, if Julie were to be found alive having changed her identity in a way that was not known to Australian authorities. Or the change in identity was known to some Australian authorities, if it was done legally with their assistance for a valid reason.

mrskafoops: Did you only ever find one facial pic of that person that looks a bit like Julie Cutler pic you posted last night?
Because if you did, maybe you should look a bit harder.

Maybe it's just a relative of Julies.
Possibly one that went through a change of name?
Or just another one of those coincidences with the human face.

The following Post newspaper article on Julie that appears at the findagrave website is worth a read and lists her similar age 'full' sister's name as Nicole.

Just ignore the typos
- TAFE should be TAE
- Death year of 1998 should be 1988
- Age at death 32-33 (should be ten years less)

'Mrs Cutler died from cancer when Julie and her sister Nicole were young girls.
Their father Roger remarried and had four more children - Rachel, Rebecca, Alexander and Jessica.
"But mum and dad talk about her often as does Nicole - they were around the same age and very close, and had grown up together. Nicole has four kids of her own.'


'REWARD:

On 19 June 2018, the Government of Western Australia announced a $250,000 reward for information which leads to the apprehension and conviction of the person, or persons, responsible for Julie’s disappearance.

The Government may also be prepared to consider recommending a protection from prosecution, or pardon for any informant with information that leads to the conviction of the person or persons responsible for the disappearance, provided that the informant was not directly responsible for the disappearance of Julie Cutler.'
Hi,
Yes if you are talking about the photo that I posted next to Julie’s.. that’s the ex wife of the guy that posted on Reddit that I mentioned earlier.
 
one eyed spy: do you still have the "For Gods Sake let her Go" article?
Was it a Post newspaper one?
I'll have a squizz & post if I have it. I do have a note of all the articles I've seen or have copies of over the years with the main points covered in each & can tell you for certain it was a Daily News article published 30 June 1988.
 
He had to learn his tricks of the trade somewhere. Grabs his first, panics, beats here all the while she's restrained.
He can't rape her so he gets more angry as time goes on.Next time, play it cool & they won't freak out or struggle until I'm ready.
Next time: He has it all right until he hears her parents (unsure of which came first, Huntingdale or Dorothy), he freaks, can't let them see him & bolts.
Next time, he loses his cool & attacks.
Next time, he's cool, calmer & collected but will make sure nobody will interrupt his quest so he does what he does & disposes of Sarah somewhere.
Next time, he does the same because it worked before & he has finally perfected his MO but maybe he feels a little bit of guilt about the first victim not being found so he leaves this one to be found when someone comes across her. All is well, next time will be perfect...
And it wasn’t perfect. He didn’t get to rape Ciara and he stopped after that. She fought pretty hard.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

https://www.news.com.au/news/vanish...g/news-story/1f9da6564bf58fdfb6f6532c5e7b5d2f
.... she had been driving home in her Fiat sedan from work along the Stirling Highway. Julie told her father, Roger, that a car had followed her closely for several kilometres along Stirling Highway, almost touching her rear bumper at times and seemed to be trying to force her off the road.
As she approached a turn-off in the beachside suburb of Cottesloe, the car pulled alongside and then suddenly veered in front of her.
Ms Cutler swerved around it and sped away, later reporting the incident to police.

So we can assume this happened at the Eric Street lights. This just could have been a case of road rage because she was travelling in the right lane and this person either wanted to get in this lane to pass her or turn right onto Eric Street? And to be honest i can't see her little Fiat speeding away from anything!! Also as this was in a completely built up area it would have been pretty hard to swerve anywhere if the car suddenly veered in front of her, unless she swerved into the oncoming traffic lanes, as to swerve in the other direction she would have hit the curb and gone onto the footpath. Julie would most likely have to have braked hard.This whole scenario doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
This article says she was driving home from work when this happened near Eric street. To go that way home she would have turned right onto mounts bay road not left like she did on the night she went missing. So this must mean she was definitely going somewhere else. Is there confirmed sightings of her at the Racquet club?
 

Attachments

  • 12156341-4ABA-4C0D-842D-862C589AD727.png
    12156341-4ABA-4C0D-842D-862C589AD727.png
    102.6 KB · Views: 48
Really though, how do we know it’s her uniform? When I worked in a hotel nearby we were given a uniform (used but laundered) and expected to return it when we left. High turn over of staff. I used it for 3 months and returned when I left. Same size as Julie’s. Do police ever confirm it’s Julies or just similar size? So much time passed it could be anyone’s.
Also why no pants or skirt?
 
I'd forgotten the detail about her possibly going to the Casino mentioned in the article here & also that they were quite sure her car was just driven down the service road & dropped into the sea, before drifting out to where it was eventually found when the ocean settled & could be seen.

I still find it a little odd that the destroyed items deemed not to be, but may have been Julie's in hindsight, were recovered so close to where the naked deceased guy (45) was found at the base of the cliff at Beach Rd so soon after she disappeared.
Anyone recall his story now? Did we ever know?

I know it's covering old ground, but could the items really have been in the sand from mid 1988 till they were recovered in 1994-1995 & what genius authorised them to be destroyed just year later if it's since been deemed significant enough to prompt at least 4 searches of the dunes in that location since? Seems unbelievable they could have operated with such an ineffective database that couldn't cross reference a damn thing for so long, but, maybe why Macro decided to go into the property room lockdown we though so odd at the time, just to sort the shit out finally? Begs the question then, what else have they destroyed over the years & why wasn't it fixed long ago?

(Full text of article below copied from this link).
Last paragraph seems to imply more than they'd ever say, but makes me question if they believe they know far more about what actually happened, without any proof?


WAtoday
UpdatedNationalWAMissing person
This was published 3 years ago

What happened to Julie Cutler? 30 years on, the question still remains
By Phil Hickey
May 8, 2018 — 11.50am
Nothing would make Ron Carey happier than for the case of Julie Cutler to be solved.

The former WA Police detective gave everything he had to try and get to the bottom of her disappearance in 1988.
Alas, Mr Carey and his team - in what was then the Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB) - were unable to provide any answers to the Cutler family.

“It was disappointing to go into retirement knowing that we had not been able to establish what had happened to Julie Cutler,” Mr Carey told WAtoday.
“I would have liked to have been able to tell Julie’s father and family what had happened to his daughter, so they could have at least had closure.”

It has been 30 years since Julie Cutler went missing in Perth. The 22-year-old was last seen leaving the Parmelia Hilton Hotel in the Perth CBD about 12.30am on June 20, 1988 after a staff function.

Two days later her car was found in the ocean at Cottesloe beach.
Apart from several Parmelia Hilton champagne flutes in the four-door Fiat, nothing else significant was found inside the vehicle.
No belongings, no clothing. No body.

The back seat of the car had washed up on the beach.
A shoulder bag Ms Cutler was known to carry has also never been found.

WAtoday can reveal a review of the case file was carried out last year by the Cold Case Homicide Squad in an attempt to unearth new clues.
But to this day no charges have been laid in connection to the case and Ms Cutler's body has never been located.

In an interview with WAtoday, Mr Carey, who spent 30 years with WA Police, reflected on the three decade old mystery.
He believes that by speaking out, there is a chance someone in the community who knows what happened will finally come forward after all these years.

Mr Carey, who rose to the rank of superintendent before retiring in 2005, first became attached to the case when he was sent to Cottesloe beach, the day Ms Cutler's car was found.
He was then a detective senior constable.

“When we received the report that a vehicle registered in Ms Cutler’s name had been found in the ocean at Cottesloe beach, I guess we expected the worst, thinking that we might find her body inside the car,” he said.

“When the vehicle was found to be empty, we began our inquiry in earnest to establish what had happened to her.”

Over the next few days Mr Carey searched the 22-year-old's home, spoke to her work colleagues and guests of the hotel and examined her car with a fine-toothed comb.

"After we recovered Julie’s vehicle...we were able to establish that one of the rear doors of her car couldn't be locked,” he said.

“So we looked at the possibility that someone may have secreted themselves in the back seat while it was parked at the hotel without her knowing and that she was forced to drive somewhere.”

Mr Carey said some time after the 22-year-old went missing, police received information which suggested she could have gone to the Burswood Casino after she left the Parmelia.

"We went there but unfortunately the CCTV footage did not extend back to the night she disappeared," he said.

“In the months following Julie’s disappearance, we spoke to numerous people in the hope we might have been able to establish what had happened to her.

“Despite our best efforts, we were not able to solve this mystery”.

The former cop believes Ms Cutler succumbed to whatever fate she met in a five-hour window between 12.30am on June 20 and daybreak that morning.
"In my view someone must have intervened between the time Julie left the Parmelia Hotel and daybreak,” he said.

“(For the car) to have found its way into the ocean, we concluded that it must have been driven off or rolled off the wall straight into the water where it must have floated momentarily, before being taken out with the motion of the waves, before sinking to the floor of the ocean.

“We were able to arrive at that conclusion because there was no sign of the vehicle at the beach when the regular swimmers arrived at daybreak to undertake their daily exercises.

“That particular night, there were strong winds and rain to the extent that the waves were lapping the retaining the wall of the Cottesloe Surf Club.

“It had to go into the water that night because the next day, the water had subsided, the tide had gone out leaving a wide gap of sand between the edge of the retaining wall and the surf.”

Mr Carey said he was convinced Ms Cutler was never in the car when it went into the water.

He said this was because nothing belonging to her was ever found on the ocean floor, or washed-up on the beach.

“Knowing that the back seat of her vehicle was able to find its way to the beach, we would have expected that something belonging to Julie would have washed up, had she been in the vehicle," he said.

The former cop said he often wondered if there was someone who could have helped police solve the case in 1988, but who chose not to come forward.

“All these years later I am still wondering if that person did exist, then maybe their relationship with the person or persons responsible for Julie’s disappearance has changed or soured to the point whereby he or she no longer feels the need to remain silent,” he said.

“That being the case, I call on those persons to do the right thing.”

Senior Sergeant Quentin Flatman, of the Cold Case Homicide Squad, said police remained committed to finding out what happened to Ms Cutler.

“The suspicious disappearance of Julie Cutler in 1988 is an open and active case at the Cold Case Homicide Squad," he said. "The WA Police Force is committed to solving this and other long-term unsolved missing persons cases."

Anyone who has information about the circumstances of Julie Cutler's disappearance can contact Crime Stoppers: 1800 333 000 or www.crimestopperswa.com.au.

Reward offered
A $250,000 reward is being offered for information about Ms Cutler's disappearance, with police saying her family has been waiting in "pain and aguish".

The reward is for information that leads to the conviction of the person, or people, responsible for Ms Cutler's disappearance, as detectives launch a fresh investigation into the case.

The state government said it may also be prepared to consider recommending protecting an informant from prosecution, provided they weren't directly responsible for her disappearance.

Phil Hickey
 
This article says she was driving home from work when this happened near Eric street. To go that way home she would have turned right onto mounts bay road not left like she did on the night she went missing. So this must mean she was definitely going somewhere else. Is there confirmed sightings of her at the Racquet club?
Streets weren't the same back then & I don't think you could turn right out of Mill St. This image is from 1983 but I'm almost certain it was the same in 1988. Screenshot_20210514-031729~2.png You had to go down & make a right turn onto William & another onto The Esplanade before veering back onto Mounts Bay Rd to continue around the river to Stirling Highway.
 
I'd forgotten the detail about her possibly going to the Casino mentioned in the article here & also that they were quite sure her car was just driven down the service road & dropped into the sea, before drifting out to where it was eventually found when the ocean settled & could be seen.

I still find it a little odd that the destroyed items deemed not to be, but may have been Julie's in hindsight, were recovered so close to where the naked deceased guy (45) was found at the base of the cliff at Beach Rd so soon after she disappeared.
Anyone recall his story now? Did we ever know?

I know it's covering old ground, but could the items really have been in the sand from mid 1988 till they were recovered in 1994-1995 & what genius authorised them to be destroyed just year later if it's since been deemed significant enough to prompt at least 4 searches of the dunes in that location since? Seems unbelievable they could have operated with such an ineffective database that couldn't cross reference a damn thing for so long, but, maybe why Macro decided to go into the property room lockdown we though so odd at the time, just to sort the sh*t out finally? Begs the question then, what else have they destroyed over the years & why wasn't it fixed long ago?

(Full text of article below copied from this link).
Last paragraph seems to imply more than they'd ever say, but makes me question if they believe they know far more about what actually happened, without any proof?


WAtoday
UpdatedNationalWAMissing person
This was published 3 years ago

What happened to Julie Cutler? 30 years on, the question still remains
By Phil Hickey
May 8, 2018 — 11.50am
Nothing would make Ron Carey happier than for the case of Julie Cutler to be solved.

The former WA Police detective gave everything he had to try and get to the bottom of her disappearance in 1988.
Alas, Mr Carey and his team - in what was then the Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB) - were unable to provide any answers to the Cutler family.

“It was disappointing to go into retirement knowing that we had not been able to establish what had happened to Julie Cutler,” Mr Carey told WAtoday.
“I would have liked to have been able to tell Julie’s father and family what had happened to his daughter, so they could have at least had closure.”

It has been 30 years since Julie Cutler went missing in Perth. The 22-year-old was last seen leaving the Parmelia Hilton Hotel in the Perth CBD about 12.30am on June 20, 1988 after a staff function.

Two days later her car was found in the ocean at Cottesloe beach.
Apart from several Parmelia Hilton champagne flutes in the four-door Fiat, nothing else significant was found inside the vehicle.
No belongings, no clothing. No body.

The back seat of the car had washed up on the beach.
A shoulder bag Ms Cutler was known to carry has also never been found.

WAtoday can reveal a review of the case file was carried out last year by the Cold Case Homicide Squad in an attempt to unearth new clues.
But to this day no charges have been laid in connection to the case and Ms Cutler's body has never been located.

In an interview with WAtoday, Mr Carey, who spent 30 years with WA Police, reflected on the three decade old mystery.
He believes that by speaking out, there is a chance someone in the community who knows what happened will finally come forward after all these years.

Mr Carey, who rose to the rank of superintendent before retiring in 2005, first became attached to the case when he was sent to Cottesloe beach, the day Ms Cutler's car was found.
He was then a detective senior constable.

“When we received the report that a vehicle registered in Ms Cutler’s name had been found in the ocean at Cottesloe beach, I guess we expected the worst, thinking that we might find her body inside the car,” he said.

“When the vehicle was found to be empty, we began our inquiry in earnest to establish what had happened to her.”

Over the next few days Mr Carey searched the 22-year-old's home, spoke to her work colleagues and guests of the hotel and examined her car with a fine-toothed comb.

"After we recovered Julie’s vehicle...we were able to establish that one of the rear doors of her car couldn't be locked,” he said.

“So we looked at the possibility that someone may have secreted themselves in the back seat while it was parked at the hotel without her knowing and that she was forced to drive somewhere.”

Mr Carey said some time after the 22-year-old went missing, police received information which suggested she could have gone to the Burswood Casino after she left the Parmelia.

"We went there but unfortunately the CCTV footage did not extend back to the night she disappeared," he said.

“In the months following Julie’s disappearance, we spoke to numerous people in the hope we might have been able to establish what had happened to her.

“Despite our best efforts, we were not able to solve this mystery”.

The former cop believes Ms Cutler succumbed to whatever fate she met in a five-hour window between 12.30am on June 20 and daybreak that morning.
"In my view someone must have intervened between the time Julie left the Parmelia Hotel and daybreak,” he said.

“(For the car) to have found its way into the ocean, we concluded that it must have been driven off or rolled off the wall straight into the water where it must have floated momentarily, before being taken out with the motion of the waves, before sinking to the floor of the ocean.

“We were able to arrive at that conclusion because there was no sign of the vehicle at the beach when the regular swimmers arrived at daybreak to undertake their daily exercises.

“That particular night, there were strong winds and rain to the extent that the waves were lapping the retaining the wall of the Cottesloe Surf Club.

“It had to go into the water that night because the next day, the water had subsided, the tide had gone out leaving a wide gap of sand between the edge of the retaining wall and the surf.”

Mr Carey said he was convinced Ms Cutler was never in the car when it went into the water.

He said this was because nothing belonging to her was ever found on the ocean floor, or washed-up on the beach.

“Knowing that the back seat of her vehicle was able to find its way to the beach, we would have expected that something belonging to Julie would have washed up, had she been in the vehicle," he said.

The former cop said he often wondered if there was someone who could have helped police solve the case in 1988, but who chose not to come forward.

“All these years later I am still wondering if that person did exist, then maybe their relationship with the person or persons responsible for Julie’s disappearance has changed or soured to the point whereby he or she no longer feels the need to remain silent,” he said.

“That being the case, I call on those persons to do the right thing.”

Senior Sergeant Quentin Flatman, of the Cold Case Homicide Squad, said police remained committed to finding out what happened to Ms Cutler.

“The suspicious disappearance of Julie Cutler in 1988 is an open and active case at the Cold Case Homicide Squad," he said. "The WA Police Force is committed to solving this and other long-term unsolved missing persons cases."

Anyone who has information about the circumstances of Julie Cutler's disappearance can contact Crime Stoppers: 1800 333 000 or www.crimestopperswa.com.au.

Reward offered
A $250,000 reward is being offered for information about Ms Cutler's disappearance, with police saying her family has been waiting in "pain and aguish".

The reward is for information that leads to the conviction of the person, or people, responsible for Ms Cutler's disappearance, as detectives launch a fresh investigation into the case.

The state government said it may also be prepared to consider recommending protecting an informant from prosecution, provided they weren't directly responsible for her disappearance.

Phil Hickey
It makes me shudder to think of what other evidence has been thrown out over the years!! Regarding the items found in 1988- what i found was really odd was that at the time they were identified as NOT belonging to Julie - by her family - then why? suddenly years later what made them think the items may/did belong to Julie?? new info? I'm sure the Police know more than they are letting on- surely if this information - again - was made public, it may trigger memories or suspicions.
As for the man found deceased in the dunes nearby, we were never given many details which leads me to believe it was a suicide.
 
It makes me shudder to think of what other evidence has been thrown out over the years!! Regarding the items found in 1988- what i found was really odd was that at the time they were identified as NOT belonging to Julie - by her family - then why? suddenly years later what made them think the items may/did belong to Julie?? new info? I'm sure the Police know more than they are letting on- surely if this information - again - was made public, it may trigger memories or suspicions.
As for the man found deceased in the dunes nearby, we were never given many details which leads me to believe it was a suicide.
There were coins in the purse that would have date stamps. I wonder if there were any post 1988? Maybe they think the stuff is not Julie’s but are just searching the area to err on the side of caution because you never know right?
 
It makes me shudder to think of what other evidence has been thrown out over the years!! Regarding the items found in 1988- what i found was really odd was that at the time they were identified as NOT belonging to Julie - by her family - then why? suddenly years later what made them think the items may/did belong to Julie?? new info? I'm sure the Police know more than they are letting on- surely if this information - again - was made public, it may trigger memories or suspicions.
As for the man found deceased in the dunes nearby, we were never given many details which leads me to believe it was a suicide.
"Officially" the line was that they showed relatives when it was handed in 1996 who dismissed them as being hers. They first searched in 2002 as part of Macro, then a review brought the images back to the families attention in 2018 who said they may have been her's afterall.
My guess is they had juniors throwing out all the shit in storage and a brown handbag recovered in sand dunes was just another bit of crap that was quick to be photographed & chucked without a second thought as to the potential relevance of any of it. .
Probably questioning why someone would even bother to hand a non identifying bag in anyway, just to waste their time.
The guy who found it wrote to the Post about the items then kept them for at least a year himself before handing them in too.

Re the deceased man, I wonder how many other suicide victims are also found naked in a public place? Did they ever say he'd been washed up onshore or his clothes were also found? Without knowing any further details that sounds as suss as it gets IMO. Even more-so if the location also housed the bag at the time, which wasn't found. We'll never know!
 
Last edited:
Re the naked man… say he left his clothes in sand dunes and walked out into the water. How quickly would the clothes deteriorate if they were left in a protected area of the dunes? They would get buried I guess. Can clothes still be recognisable after this amount of time? Also how much information was there about him in the media? I googled it but didn’t find anything. Are the police sure he jumped or did he wash up on the beach?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A brief overview of David Everett's antecedents appears in this old article. Which also describes his motivations for financial gain, vengeance, and I would add infamy. He seemed to of had an problem with feeling a sense of entitlement IMO.
http://thewest2.smedia.com.au/Olive/APA/thewest-archives/SharedView.Article.aspx?href=WAN/2008/08/30&id=Ar00500&sk=DD764936
Extract>
"In just a few years in the 1990s, Everett transformed from respected soldier and family man into a feared bandit with a thirst for vengeance.

He enlisted in 1978 as an apprentice mechanic, joined the elite SAS in 1983 and transferred to WA. He married in 1986 and was given an honourable discharge that year.

Everett then fought as a mercenary with the Karen and WA charges against him over this involvement were dropped. Other charges over well-planned and violent robberykidnappings involved supermarket and cinema managers but a lack of evidence at the time led to his release on home detention in August 1991. In September 1991, he faked his own abduction from his sister’s home.

While on the run in August 1992, he terrorised the wife and two children of an Armadale supermarket manager in their home before forcing him to drive to his shop and open the safe. Days later he stole a big quantity of explosives from a Baldivis explosives magazine before blowing it up.

Everett planned to rob a goldmine and kill staff and police but a terrified associate, who is a protected witness living overseas, informed police who then bugged their meetings.

Police arrested Everett a few days later when he gave up without a struggle but taunted detectives to “give me a bullet and finish the job”.

Everett served 10 years of an 18-year sentence and lives in Kununurra. Recent charges against him alleging the theft of tractors were dropped"

His obituary clarifies his justification for his criminal activities and motivations, but clearly shows that he fabricated his pretence at remorse by continually reoffending. IMO.
http://thewest2.smedia.com.au/Olive...px?href=WAN/2013/05/16&id=Ar01301&sk=8B964740
Extract>
"
After leaving the army in 1986, Everett became a mercenary in Burma fighting with and training Karen rebels.

But when he returned to Perth, he used his counterterrorism training to commit a series of violent crimes.

In 1991, he and a mate kidnapped the manager of the Carousel cinema complex and his wife at gunpoint. He described the robbery in his book Shadow Warrior and the moment he realised the woman was pregnant.

“If there were ever a turning point in my life, this was it,” he wrote.

“If I look back on all the lawless and dangerous things I have done, that moment on a hot January night, when I saw the look in that terrorised woman’s eyes, stands out as the one when I started to change my opinion of myself.”

Despite his claims of contrition in the book, Everett continued to commit similar robberies in 1992. After months on the run from police, he abducted a supermarket manager’s family, including a sixmonth-old baby, in order to steal the store’s takings.

His next target was another store manager, who had a doberman. When the dog attacked, Everett crushed its skull before entering the manager’s house with an M-16 rifle. After being captured by WA Police and sentenced to 18 years jail, Everett was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

He was released in 2002 and, from time to time, was seen at the SAS barracks in Swanbourne.

His name made the news again as part of a 2009 civil court case involving his wife and Mr Quigley.

The MP was given police protection after receiving an “extortion note” he blamed on Everett."
I've linked articles from Trove, which shows that there might of been a motive to abduct someone named Julie Cutler to extort money for financial gain, or even revenge for financial loss. And I've linked articles, a UNSW project and social media posts showing a route of acquaintances for information to reach someone like David Everett to form this motivation.
I have also linked articles to show antecedents exists of abductions to extort money within a few years after Julie's disappearance. The same articles show that David Everett was living in Perth at the time of Julie's disappearance.
IMO, for all the extraneous circumstances to this case to fit into this would require a fair degree of planning, and prior training to be able to achieve this without being caught, and no lack of compunction to abort at any time and dispose of Julie without any moral quandary.
I'll now attach an extract from a Kindle sample (which is free from Amazon) of the book Shadow Warrior, which I think clearly shows this.
IMO, In this chapter he seems to of learnt some lessons from past endeavors of a similar nature judging by his narrative. Did that include Julie Cutler?
I'll leave this theory now to you to ponder.
Motive
Opportunity
Means
This is a good lesson for most. Its ok to have theories its even better when you provide the research and background to support a theory
I note that an alibi for David Everett nor any evidence that would strongly refute this kidnap abduction theory has yet come forward. It still must therefore be considered to be in play.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
 
It might be worthwhile now to list the alternative theories and start looking for evidence to eliminate them. Hopefully what's left will be the truth.

I'd suggest these theories that have been suggested over the years for a list.
(Apologies for missing any of them)

Theories involving only Julie acting alone.
Suicide
Insurance Fraud, gone wrong.
Staged disappearance.
Accident and misadventure whilst under the influence

Theories involving a third party
Road rage / motor vehicle accidental manslaughter cover up
Random Rapist
Random car jacker
Jilted lover / stalker abduction
Kidnapping for Extortion
Serial Killer
Hoon gang
Occult sacrifice



Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
It's probably safe to eliminate the first group of theories where Julie acted alone.
Family reported that she wasn't suicidal, and didn't drink excessively. She didn't seem to be short of money. She hasn't shown up over the decades

Of the second group of theories
Police were reported as saying that the ex boyfriend is not a suspect. The family reported that she didn't have any enemies. The media article above suggests that Police believe more than 1 person involved, so if that's the case it would eliminate theories involving a single actor, the road rage cop, the serial killer, etc. We would theoretically be left with scenarios involving a kidnapping team, a gang, or a group etc.
However, if the break in at her flat and the vehicle incident on Stirling Hwy, are related, then that would further eliminate scenarios involving random opportunity.
IMO that leaves kidnapping for extortion as the most likely, and since IMO there's enough to substantiate an accusation that Vernon Silich had enough knowledge and David Everett had been proven to be capable and willing to do similar, and they were both in Perth, I'm of the opinion that with a little more supportive evidence, like somebody coming forward to say that the two knew each other, then this line of inquiry must be worth following up by WA Police IMO.
Now go and prove there's evidence to eliminate David Everett from being a POI. :)

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
There are plenty of possibilities. The ex boyfriend one was eliminated early on by WA Police. Most of the others don't fit the circumstances that occurred prior to her disappearance. The Everett kidnapping theory does however fit. He cased his victims, broke into their homes and followed them whilst planning his crimes, and he aborted them, and was prepared to kill his victims or police when things went wrong.
Kidnapping Julie Cutler and then realising that he should've kidnapped her aunty, also named Julie Cutler instead, could've been enough to cause see him to abort his crime and dispose of his unintended victim.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
There are plenty of possibilities. The ex boyfriend one was eliminated early on by WA Police. Most of the others don't fit the circumstances that occurred prior to her disappearance. The Everett kidnapping theory does however fit. He cased his victims, broke into their homes and followed them whilst planning his crimes, and he aborted them, and was prepared to kill his victims or police when things went wrong.
Kidnapping Julie Cutler and then realising that he should've kidnapped her aunty, also named Julie Cutler instead, could've been enough to cause see him to abort his crime and dispose of his unintended victim.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
Say Julie
- Went to work, took makeup case inside with change of clothes (dress) for after shift.
- After work took make up case out to car (seen leaning in passenger door).
- Went to work function.
- left work function after an hour or so?
- Walked to racquet club with uniform - she planned to have a drink and sleepover at boyfriends so left her car at work?
- arrived at the club, saw boyfriend doing something or had disagreement with him (he sounds like a bit of a @!$?)
-left club and went to kebab shop to have a sit down for a bit.
- left kebab shop and accidentally left uniform.
- went back to parmelia to get her car around 12.30am
- decided to go to the Cas where her guy acquaintance told her he was going. He was only there for a few days from interstate and after fight with boyfriend she thought it would be a good idea instead of going home to an empty flat.
- Offered him a ride to where he was staying in Cott… a motel?
- gets there, he invites her in for a night cap. Why not, she trusts him.
- get inside, he tries it on, she’s not expecting it. She sees him as a “friend” and also has a bf. Rejects him. Turns out he doesn’t like rejection.

after that I’m not sure but car ends up in ocean.

or,
Another theory is that sometimes people just want to start over anonymously, they don’t necessarily have to have bad circumstances in their life. Maybe Julie wanted that? We don’t know that she didn’t for certain.

btw does anyone know the address of the racquet club when it was in Northbridge?
 
Say Julie
- Went to work, took makeup case inside with change of clothes (dress) for after shift.
- After work took make up case out to car (seen leaning in passenger door).
- Went to work function.
- left work function after an hour or so?
- Walked to racquet club with uniform - she planned to have a drink and sleepover at boyfriends so left her car at work?
- arrived at the club, saw boyfriend doing something or had disagreement with him (he sounds like a bit of a @!$?)
-left club and went to kebab shop to have a sit down for a bit.
- left kebab shop and accidentally left uniform.
- went back to parmelia to get her car around 12.30am
- decided to go to the Cas where her guy acquaintance told her he was going. He was only there for a few days from interstate and after fight with boyfriend she thought it would be a good idea instead of going home to an empty flat.
- Offered him a ride to where he was staying in Cott… a motel?
- gets there, he invites her in for a night cap. Why not, she trusts him.
- get inside, he tries it on, she’s not expecting it. She sees him as a “friend” and also has a bf. Rejects him. Turns out he doesn’t like rejection.

after that I’m not sure but car ends up in ocean.

or,
Another theory is that sometimes people just want to start over anonymously, they don’t necessarily have to have bad circumstances in their life. Maybe Julie wanted that? We don’t know that she didn’t for certain.

btw does anyone know the address of the racquet club when it was in Northbridge?
If the break in at her flat in Fremantle and the car following and harassing her on Stirling Highway Mosman Park both weeks prior to her disappearance, were committed by the person responsible for her disappearance then theories of opportunity attacks, random attack, or sudden crimes of passion, rage etc wouldn't fit. This limits the theories that fit with the elements that Nicole asserted that the family considers as essential elements to be considered in her sister's disappearance.
Possibly the family might be wrong and it appears even Nicole expressed two different opinions about the phone call to the newspaper a week after the disappearance, once calling it a crank, and years later wanting it included with the other two aforementioned events as wanting included in the investigation.
All 3 fit the Everett theory.
I would prefer the idea of eliminating theories so that what's left must be the truth.
So let's go through each theory and see if the facts will extinguish the theory and see what's left?

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
What facts have been established?
Going through this topic...
Leopold Minerals fraud case in 1970s leads to creation of ASIC. It was extensively quoted as the reason that ASIC was formed.
Julie's uncle was convicted and goaled for salting the nickel assays to manipulate the share price of the company.
Judge's comments regarding gaining benefit in share dealings but inability of prosecutors to prove actual financial gain or discovery of where the money went were reported in media.
Julie reported her flat broken into, but nothing was stolen.
Julie told family of an incident with another vehicle on Stirling Highway Mosman Park.
Julie had an Aunty who worked at Mosman Park, and her name was also Julie Cutler, she was the wife of the uncle convicted over the Leopold Minerals case back in the 70's.
Julie's car was found the next morning.
Lights were on.
Window of time that the car should've entered the ocean between leaving work and being discovered was about 5 hours.
Earlier in this topic that was narrowed down to within a few hours of dawn I believe.
Clothes were found in Centreways arcade, now called 160 arcade, but once called the Paragon arcade. The arcade was closed with rollerdoors between 6PM and 7AM Mon - Friday, and all Sunday in 1988, so Julie couldn't of left them there after finishing work that night, but someone else could've left them there the next weekday. No ransom note though was reported in media articles.
Someone rang the newspaper claiming to be Julie after media reported her missing.
Items found in dunes opposite cottesloe golf course, including pen with Hawaiian on it.
Hawaiian company offices in St George's terrace were virtually next door to the Parmelia Hotel. Unknown when these items were dumped.
Vernon Silich, son of a copper who worked on the Leopold fraud case, worked as taxi driver, possibly associated with another Taxi Driver who was acquainted with a former SAS soldier. David Everett was also possibly acquainted with same former SAS soldier, so it's quite possible that rumours about the Leopold case can be traced from Sillich to Everett without either having ever met. Vernon murdered his parents, so we'll never know if his dad ever began to suspect that the Leopold case could've led to Julie's disappearance.
Supreme Court decision document on Julie's uncle's conviction went missing from the Supreme Court file room. Unknown exactly when but 1988 is possible.
Media reported that Ex boyfriend ruled out by WA Police.
Ex SAS soldier, David Everett in Perth at the time. Was learning to fly. Getting a pilot's license is expensive. Has antecedents for kidnap and ransom amongst other things.
Another possibility, BRE. Only ever convicted of opportunity crimes. Although broke in homes in Huntingdale, none of those victims were murdered. Progression of seriousness of offending over time would suggest that abduction & murder in 1988 doesn't fit the progression of his offending.


Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
What facts have been established?
Going through this topic...
Leopold Minerals fraud case in 1970s leads to creation of ASIC. It was extensively quoted as the reason that ASIC was formed.
Julie's uncle was convicted and goaled for salting the nickel assays to manipulate the share price of the company.
Judge's comments regarding gaining benefit in share dealings but inability of prosecutors to prove actual financial gain or discovery of where the money went were reported in media.
Julie reported her flat broken into, but nothing was stolen.
Julie told family of an incident with another vehicle on Stirling Highway Mosman Park.
Julie had an Aunty who worked at Mosman Park, and her name was also Julie Cutler, she was the wife of the uncle convicted over the Leopold Minerals case back in the 70's.
Julie's car was found the next morning.
Lights were on.
Window of time that the car should've entered the ocean between leaving work and being discovered was about 5 hours.
Earlier in this topic that was narrowed down to within a few hours of dawn I believe.
Clothes were found in Centreways arcade, now called 160 arcade, but once called the Paragon arcade. The arcade was closed with rollerdoors between 6PM and 7AM Mon - Friday, and all Sunday in 1988, so Julie couldn't of left them there after finishing work that night, but someone else could've left them there the next weekday. No ransom note though was reported in media articles.
Someone rang the newspaper claiming to be Julie after media reported her missing.
Items found in dunes opposite cottesloe golf course, including pen with Hawaiian on it.
Hawaiian company offices in St George's terrace were virtually next door to the Parmelia Hotel. Unknown when these items were dumped.
Vernon Sillich, son of the copper who worked on the Leopold fraud case, worked as taxi driver, possibly associated with another Taxi Driver who was acquainted with a former SAS soldier. David Everett was also possibly acquainted with same former SAS soldier, so it's quite possible that rumours about the Leopold case can be traced from Sillich to Everett without either having ever met. Vernon murdered his parents, so we'll never know if his dad ever began to suspect that the Leopold case could've led to Julie's disappearance.
Supreme Court decision document on Julie's uncle's conviction went missing from the Supreme Court file room. Unknown exactly when but 1988 is possible.
Media reported that Ex boyfriend ruled out by WA Police.
Ex SAS soldier, David Everett in Perth at the time. Was learning to fly. Getting a pilot's license is expensive. Has antecedents for kidnap and ransom amongst other things.
Another possibility, BRE. Only ever convicted of opportunity crimes. Although broke in homes in Huntingdale, none of those victims were murdered. Progression of seriousness of offending over time would suggest that abduction & murder in 1988 doesn't fit the progression of his offending.


Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
I think we can rule out BRE. As for Everett.. didn’t his wife fall pregnant in 1987? Not sure what kind of woman she is but naturally women nest, set up their homes for the baby. Even a hardened,
it would be a bit far to walk there from the parmelia …
 
What facts have been established?
Going through this topic...
Leopold Minerals fraud case in 1970s leads to creation of ASIC. It was extensively quoted as the reason that ASIC was formed.
Julie's uncle was convicted and goaled for salting the nickel assays to manipulate the share price of the company.
Judge's comments regarding gaining benefit in share dealings but inability of prosecutors to prove actual financial gain or discovery of where the money went were reported in media.
Julie reported her flat broken into, but nothing was stolen.
Julie told family of an incident with another vehicle on Stirling Highway Mosman Park.
Julie had an Aunty who worked at Mosman Park, and her name was also Julie Cutler, she was the wife of the uncle convicted over the Leopold Minerals case back in the 70's.
Julie's car was found the next morning.
Lights were on.
Window of time that the car should've entered the ocean between leaving work and being discovered was about 5 hours.
Earlier in this topic that was narrowed down to within a few hours of dawn I believe.
Clothes were found in Centreways arcade, now called 160 arcade, but once called the Paragon arcade. The arcade was closed with rollerdoors between 6PM and 7AM Mon - Friday, and all Sunday in 1988, so Julie couldn't of left them there after finishing work that night, but someone else could've left them there the next weekday. No ransom note though was reported in media articles.
Someone rang the newspaper claiming to be Julie after media reported her missing.
Items found in dunes opposite cottesloe golf course, including pen with Hawaiian on it.
Hawaiian company offices in St George's terrace were virtually next door to the Parmelia Hotel. Unknown when these items were dumped.
Vernon Silich, son of a copper who worked on the Leopold fraud case, worked as taxi driver, possibly associated with another Taxi Driver who was acquainted with a former SAS soldier. David Everett was also possibly acquainted with same former SAS soldier, so it's quite possible that rumours about the Leopold case can be traced from Sillich to Everett without either having ever met. Vernon murdered his parents, so we'll never know if his dad ever began to suspect that the Leopold case could've led to Julie's disappearance.
Supreme Court decision document on Julie's uncle's conviction went missing from the Supreme Court file room. Unknown exactly when but 1988 is possible.
Media reported that Ex boyfriend ruled out by WA Police.
Ex SAS soldier, David Everett in Perth at the time. Was learning to fly. Getting a pilot's license is expensive. Has antecedents for kidnap and ransom amongst other things.
Another possibility, BRE. Only ever convicted of opportunity crimes. Although broke in homes in Huntingdale, none of those victims were murdered. Progression of seriousness of offending over time would suggest that abduction & murder in 1988 doesn't fit the progression of his offending.


Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
My understanding is that Everett was a pretty smart guy, he followed and researched his targets. I can't see him mistaking Julie the aunt for Julie the niece. There would have been a huge age gap, they worked at different places, drove different cars and lived in different suburbs(?) So I am leaning towards Sillich - if I had to choose. Does any one have a photo of the Aunt for comparison??
 
My understanding is that Everett was a pretty smart guy, he followed and researched his targets. I can't see him mistaking Julie the aunt for Julie the niece. There would have been a huge age gap, they worked at different places, drove different cars and lived in different suburbs(?) So I am leaning towards Sillich - if I had to choose. Does any one have a photo of the Aunt for comparison??
Everett was trained by the SAS, so he had the skills for it, but he wasn't trained in intelligence and subsequently he made a lot of mistakes in his offending. Maybe he went down to Julie's uncle's place in Rockingham, saw Julie's car, followed it to Fremantle, broke into her flat, found enough just to confirm the name. Saw an article describing her aunt's work at Nedlands and Mosman Park libraries, hung around Mosman Park saw the car again, thought he had the right person and tried to intercept for a kidnapping. 1st attempt failed, then did it again on the night of her disappearance. Put the car in the most public place, but the ocean swept it away, left the bag of clothes but forgot the ransom note.
Instead of a Brian going to the press asking for the return of his wife, read about a Roger asking for the return of his daughter, lost his bottle when he realised he had the wrong person or Julie convinced him that there was no hidden wealth, and thus he bailed on his plans to ransom her? And maybe because the victim saw his face he despatched her?
It's simple and it fits the facts, but if someone else could've tried this, I just don't know. I looked for other people who had a history of kidnapping for ransom in WA, but only Everett stand's out so far.

Could Vernon Silich of done it? Maybe it might be worth the Police's time to interview him for it. It might explain why he really murdered his parents too if Bob even casually mentioned that he was wondering if the unsubstantiated rumours of wealth being hidden away from the Leopold fraud had anything to do with Julie's disappearance. That might've been enough for Vernon to worry about being caught, but then again he didn't appear to of thought through how to get away with his parents being dead. Commit a double murder to get away with a single murder makes little sense, but offenders rarely ever make sense, otherwise they wouldn't be offending I suppose.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Everett was trained by the SAS, so he had the skills for it, but he wasn't trained in intelligence and subsequently he made a lot of mistakes in his offending. Maybe he went down to Julie's uncle's place in Rockingham, saw Julie's car, followed it to Fremantle, broke into her flat, found enough just to confirm the name. Saw an article describing her aunt's work at Nedlands and Mosman Park libraries, hung around Mosman Park saw the car again, thought he had the right person and tried to intercept for a kidnapping. 1st attempt failed, then did it again on the night of her disappearance. Put the car in the most public place, but the ocean swept it away, left the bag of clothes but forgot the ransom note.
Instead of a Brian going to the press asking for the return of his wife, read about a Roger asking for the return of his daughter, lost his bottle when he realised he had the wrong person or Julie convinced him that there was no hidden wealth, and thus he bailed on his plans to ransom her? And maybe because the victim saw his face he despatched her?
It's simple and it fits the facts, but if someone else could've tried this, I just don't know. I looked for other people who had a history of kidnapping for ransom in WA, but only Everett stand's out so far.

Could Vernon Silich of done it? Maybe it might be worth the Police's time to interview him for it. It might explain why he really murdered his parents too if Bob even casually mentioned that he was wondering if the unsubstantiated rumours of wealth being hidden away from the Leopold fraud had anything to do with Julie's disappearance. That might've been enough for Vernon to worry about being caught, but then again he didn't appear to of thought through how to get away with his parents being dead. Commit a double murder to get away with a single murder makes little sense, but offenders rarely ever make sense, otherwise they wouldn't be offending I suppose.

Sent from my SM-A305YN using Tapatalk
Agree. As with all scenario's everyone has put forward, there are lots of maybe's and what if's. If only we could find one little 'definite' !! But there are none. A couple of things I would like to know/see happen -
# Where finger prints taken from Julies flat?
#Were finger prints/DNA taken from the bag that contained (supposed) Julie's uniform?
#What was the outcome from the cigarette butts found in Julies Car?
#would Julie turning left from Mill St onto Mounts Bay rd, be the direction she would use to go home??
#What time was her shift the next day?
People that need to be re questioned -
#Sister/father that took Julies call regarding road rage event - every detail of the alleged event.
#Aunty, Uncle and cousins regarding if anything unusual happened during that time.
#Staff Julie worked with - regarding where she was going that night, what she talked about that night, who smoked, how Julie came to have the wine glasses, what they knew about her friends, uni friends and other work colleges. What Julie did in her free time and where she went. Did she ever go to this Kebab shop?
These same or similar questions need to asked to all whom knew Julie.
I know this has all probably been done before and the Police probably have the answers to some of the above.
Forgive me if I am a little behind :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Julie Cutler - Murder - 1988 - Cottesloe WA *To the Coroner

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top