A bit. Teague, Simpson etc
Not Simpson. He has a very clear game plan that all players must adhere to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A bit. Teague, Simpson etc
Why in hades would they even think about replacing Lyon with Sums?!?! Is this a sad joke?!!
Come off it. WC are the most rigidly structured team in the history of footy, including 'Rossball' teams circa 2009 to 2015. Teague lets players off the leash? How? Point to one single metric.A bit. Teague, Simpson etc
I would like them to play more instinctively and skilfully. WC do that, with a demand for hard running and everyone contributing. They have a bevy of exciting skilful players playing forward so they can clearly make that work within their structures. Freo were heavily weighed down by defense first thinking, no interest in skill, our small forward smothered by congestion and too much left to too few.Not Simpson. He has a very clear game plan that all players must adhere to.
Assuming some ex players know what they are talking about, it has been said regularly that Teague has played players in their preferred positions and turned away from Boltons more defence focused structures. WC are organised, hard running and all players contributing.Come off it. WC are the most rigidly structured team in the history of footy, including 'Rossball' teams circa 2009 to 2015. Teague lets players off the leash? How? Point to one single metric.
Yeah, I agree. As an outsider looking in.I'd find it hard to believe a bloke who won a u18 championship and been out of the afl system for years can put together a better presentation than someone who has coached both teams of the 2018 grand final.
so would you be saying someone that has recent first hand experience in WCs coaching and structures, and/or has put a lot of time into breaking down those structures in, let's say, a really important game like a grand final? Hmmm. If only there was someone out there with that kind of experience that may also be willing to come to Perth.I would like them to play more instinctively and skilfully. WC do that, with a demand for hard running and everyone contributing. They have a bevy of exciting skilful players playing forward so they can clearly make that work within their structures. Freo were heavily weighed down by defense first thinking, no interest in skill, our small forward smothered by congestion and too much left to too few.
Yeah can't think who.so would you be saying someone that has recent first hand experience in WCs coaching and structures, and/or has put a lot of time into breaking down those structures in, let's say, a really important game like a grand final? Hmmm. If only there was someone out there with that kind of experience that may also be willing to come to Perth.
Crap, that's not that you said: you said this:Assuming some ex players know what they are talking about, it has been said regularly that Teague has played players in their preferred positions and turned away from Boltons more defence focused structures. WC are organised, hard running and all players contributing.
They do not mean remotely the same thing and pretending that's what you meant is disingenuous; rather than just admitting what you said was not thought though.If they get it wrong for a second time- as in agreeing to the second signing of Ross during a rebuild phase, then I imagine they will be held accountable, as they should be. It isn't an exact science but I hope they at least find someone more congenial and a coach that can set the players free a bit. If I wanted to watch little league, I would go and watch it.
i imagine it would be one of those life changing moments that sends me to join my youngest in becoming a Hawthorn supporter - which I used to give him sh5t about (even though he's only 7) but now I'm starting to think that he's a lot smarter than I am and maybe he should probably be running my share portfolio too.Just imagine.. Suma as our next coach and West Coast going back to back.
I would like them to play more instinctively and skilfully. WC do that, with a demand for hard running and everyone contributing. They have a bevy of exciting skilful players playing forward so they can clearly make that work within their structures. Freo were heavily weighed down by defense first thinking, no interest in skill, our small forward smothered by congestion and too much left to too few.
You can use flair, instinct and skill within an organised structure.Crap, that's not that you said: you said this:
They do not mean remotely the same thing and pretending that's what you meant is disingenuous; rather than just admitting what you said was not thought though.
I fundamentally believe that every team has a rigid structure. Within that structure you will have a number of players who have more attacking license (Fyfe) than others, but that is still a role within a structure. I'd also say the reason why Clarkson is so good are because his structures are so good. That is precisely why they could absorb injuries in their 3 peat.I would like them to play more instinctively and skilfully. WC do that, with a demand for hard running and everyone contributing. They have a bevy of exciting skilful players playing forward so they can clearly make that work within their structures. Freo were heavily weighed down by defense first thinking, no interest in skill, our small forward smothered by congestion and too much left to too few.
And Freo did. Hill, Fyfe, Walters definitely did.You can use flair, instinct and skill within an organised structure.
whats pavs coaching experience?Should be Pav