- Dec 20, 2021
- 6,604
- 17,956
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
Watertight.Cause trump is weird and a loser
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Watertight.Cause trump is weird and a loser
Do do understand the concept of within the margin of error and outside of it?If you're wiping out Harris lead on RCP to say it's neck and neck, but quoting Biden and Clinton leads verbatim, seems odd.
The RCP average for Battleground states, without some recent favourable polls from one of the same pollsters they use, has Harris winning enough states to get to 270.
Yeah it's tighter than historical comparisons, but not a like for like.
No, I'm clearly an idiot.Do do understand the concept of within the margin of error and outside of it?
Too many concussionsI am kinda obsessed with Stokey to be honest. He's fascinating, aenigmahypocrite wrapped in riddle. All the consistency of an overcooked 2 minute noodle and a lack of self awareness so complete as to be almost profound.
I hope he's donating his body to science, a brain like that needs to be studied.
Sometimes Im not aure. I mentioned the concurring polls of Biden and Hillary from this point in the rac because they were outside the margin of error but both races were still very tight on election day.No, I'm clearly an idiot
/s
Correct, and I'm nothing if well manneredWould think it's just good manners to tag the person you're mentioning.
There it isAre you saying women cant or shouldnt think for themselves?
I mean, if you think that polling organisations haven't changed their methods since 2016, then sure this might mean something, but also if you look at how Dems have been outperforming their polling in the past few elections (remember that so-called red wave?) then it might mean even less than nothing. Who knows?Sometimes Im not aure. I mentioned the concurring polls of Biden and Hillary from this point in the rac because they were outside the margin of error but both races were still very tight on election day.
From an historical standpoint shouldnt we take it that Harris needs go be at least +8 to feel comfortable.
I also notice you dismissed the bit where Trump gets to 270. No wonder you criled over me dusnissing 1.8% which is once again within the margin of error.
You’re absolutely right. I should have said “Only question is why it’s not 100% for all genders”.Are you saying women cant or shouldnt think for themselves?
So their changed methods produced similar results for 2016 to 2020 but now they've really got their act together.I mean, if you think that polling organisations haven't changed their methods since 2016, then sure this might mean something, but also if you look at how Dems have been outperforming their polling in the past few elections (remember that so-called red wave?) then it might mean even less than nothing. Who knows?
I said nothing about abortion.He's saying that 100% of women should vote Democrat due to abortion. Do you know the % of women who have an abortion in the US? It's very far from 100% so clearly not a deciding factor for 100% of women.
Makes it even more baffling where your 100% comes from.I said nothing about abortion.
Seriously?Makes it even more baffling where your 100% comes from.
Sometimes Im not aure. I mentioned the concurring polls of Biden and Hillary from this point in the rac because they were outside the margin of error but both races were still very tight on election day.
From an historical standpoint shouldnt we take it that Harris needs go be at least +8 to feel comfortable.
I also notice you dismissed the bit where Trump gets to 270. No wonder you criled over me dusnissing 1.8% which is once again within the margin of error.
Yeah, it's tight. That's clear. It's just amusing to see people try and use current polling, especially given the trends, as bad news for Harris. Plenty of work to be done though.Latest polling indicates a slight lead to Harris in the Sun belt states, or a tie. So let's just call it even and say that she picks up 2 of the 4. Then she only needs to hold 2 of the 3 Rust belt states, in which she is leading.
Polling is polling. It's a snapshot in time of a group of individuals. So to be taken with a grain of salt for sure. However, the trend has been consistent for a while now.
Lots to play out, but plenty of reasons to be positive if you're Team Harris.
Lol. the left in a nutshell. Its always a moral argument. decency resoect etc. How you could possibly support Trump. Yet they conveniently ignore they supported an even bigger womaniser and disrespector of women in Clinton. They ignore Biden's continual invasion of personal space with sniffing etc.Seriously?
I would have thought any decent, respectful human being already would be repulsed by Trump’s attitude to women before specific questions are mentioned.
My point is I’m kinda surprised anyone wouldn’t be, frankly.
Anyway I think I told myself to ignore your posts a few weeks back, so it’s been great, but bye.
What a nonsensical post. I bet the Russian bots loved it though!So their changed methods produced similar results for 2016 to 2020 but now they've really got their act together.
whatabout whatabout whataboutLol. the left in a nutshell. Its always a moral argument. decency resoect etc. How you could possibly support Trump. Yet they conveniently ignore they supported an even bigger womaniser and disrespector of women in Clinton. They ignore Biden's continual invasion of personal space with sniffing etc.
Trump I dont think js any better but jts not why I would vite for him.
Not sure I'd characterise Trump as just a womaniser and disrespectful to women, but then I wouldn't characterise Clinton as just that either (I was 14 when he left office, didn't really follow US politics much then). If I were running the DNC, he wouldn't have been allowed to speak.Lol. the left in a nutshell. Its always a moral argument. decency resoect etc. How you could possibly support Trump. Yet they conveniently ignore they supported an even bigger womaniser and disrespector of women in Clinton. They ignore Biden's continual invasion of personal space with sniffing etc.
Trump I dont think js any better but jts not why I would vite for him.
Well against my better judgment I’ll respond, because I would say this is conservative groupies in a nutshell. Moral equivalence FMD.Lol. the left in a nutshell. Its always a moral argument. decency resoect etc. How you could possibly support Trump. Yet they conveniently ignore they supported an even bigger womaniser and disrespector of women in Clinton. They ignore Biden's continual invasion of personal space with sniffing etc.
Trump I dont think js any better but jts not why I would vite for him.
Exactly. All that is left is to choose between the shark or electrocutionWatertight.
He's saying that 100% of women should vote Democrat due to abortion. Do you know the % of women who have an abortion in the US? It's very far from 100% so clearly not a deciding factor for 100% of women.