- Sep 4, 2005
- 7,071
- 3,715
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Newcastle Jets
- Thread starter
- #276
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There def is but were going off course a little coz were already in 2 leagues with standard settongs lol. Plus standard settings is free kicks and those cats blowAs much as leagues are customisable, is there a popular format out there that people use? We don't have to reinvent the wheel.
That said, I've had a look at the rankings and they look pretty good. Mids could possibly use a minor adjustment so more float to the top but I think the KPP's are about right relative to other FWD/DEF.
Perhaps standard scoring with key positions could be an option? Makes them relevant Because we all need to start themAs much as leagues are customisable, is there a popular format out there that people use? We don't have to reinvent the wheel.
That said, I've had a look at the rankings and they look pretty good. Mids could possibly use a minor adjustment so more float to the top but I think the KPP's are about right relative to other FWD/DEF.
Tackles in twice?Maybe add goal assists to poll too Zim^zuM though i think i prefer it without it. Currently poll has it as
kicks
tackles
hb
marks
tackles
score
dis eff %
spoils
hitouts
not sure we should go down that road but we could do 2 key fwds are backs and 4 normal fwds and backs
my badTackles in twice?
Makes it a bit difficult to define key fwds and backs when keeper platform doesn'tnot sure we should go down that road but we could do 2 key fwds are backs and 4 normal fwds and backs
thats just it we just discovered theres a mode were it does split themMakes it a bit difficult to define key feds and backs when keeper platform doesn't s
Separate them
Tackles in twice?
Check screen shotsSorry, didn't realise that.
So i propose this, instead of 6 fwds and backs we make it 2 key fwds, 2 key backs, 4 other fwds & backs (assuming u could play more key positions here if u wanted but they can be any back or fwd) then we do the cats as the voting shows above so
Score
kicks
HB
tackles
marks
hitouts
Disp eff %
spoils
and 1 of goal assists, clearances or contested marks to make it an odd number
I think if we were to have key positions I'd be careful in having stats that favour them when we would only play 2 defs and fwdsSo i propose this, instead of 6 fwds and backs we make it 2 key fwds, 2 key backs, 4 other fwds & backs (assuming u could play more key positions here if u wanted but they can be any back or fwd) then we do the cats as the voting shows above so
Score
kicks
HB
tackles
marks
hitouts
Disp eff %
spoils
and 1 of goal assists, clearances or contested marks to make it an odd number
Okay so no spoils and just have 7 cats? It's possible this is just getting more confusing this way.I think if we were to have key positions I'd be careful in having stats that favour them when we would only play 2 defs and fwds
We could absolutely do that but that's on the poll and clearances currently has more votes than it. Let's wait for the other coaches to do the poll.The current 8 most popular cats is the way to go and then maybe make score worth 1.5?
Hehe we haven't done the RNG roll for draft order yet.While we're at it, can I have a better pick?