List of WELCHERS on Bigfooty

Remove this Banner Ad

Reference A: Bloodret puffing his chest proclaiming a 10 goal win
Reference B: Bayer proposing a Sig/Avatar bet with a slightly ambiguous terminology of 'give you a generous line of 5 goals'
Reference C:
Wow giving the Hawks a 30 point start on a miserable wet night.....
Quote by me clearing up the bet conditions stating that Hawthorn have a 30 point head start
Reference D:
Silly bet by him, not sure what he was thinking.
Bloodret acknowledging the 30 point line. This statement implies that in the eye of Bloodret, the Swans are awesome and should demolish Hawthorn by > 30 points
 

Log in to remove this ad.

When someone asks for a sig and av bet, it is always on head-to-head unless specifically agreed upon by both people that different terms may apply. Bayer threw a 30 point line at me, which gave the Swans +30, not Swans -60+30. This really isn't rocket science.

The bet may have seemed ambiguous, but the context was obvious, and your subsequent clarification of a head start to us made it crystal clear.
 
The bet may have seemed ambiguous, but the context was obvious, and your subsequent clarification of a head start to us made it crystal clear.
It clearly wasn't obvious, a lot of people are confused. If you were to win that bet you would have had to have said something along the lines of I'll give you a five goal line on top of that 60 points, but instead you just said "I'll give you a five goal line", so of course I took it with pleasured hands, hence why I said it was a silly bet and I wasn't sure what you were thinking.
 
Reference A: Bloodret puffing his chest proclaiming a 10 goal win
Reference B: Bayer proposing a Sig/Avatar bet with a slightly ambiguous terminology of 'give you a generous line of 5 goals'
Reference C:

Quote by me clearing up the bet conditions stating that Hawthorn have a 30 point head start
Reference D:

Bloodret acknowledging the 30 point line. This statement implies that in the eye of Bloodret, the Swans are awesome and should demolish Hawthorn by > 30 points
Your conclusion is dogshit. The more obvious interpretation is that giving the swans a 5 goal start was a silly bet for Bayer because it was very favourable to Bloodret, “not sure what he was thinking”. Why would a hawks 5 goal start be that favourable? It wouldn’t - you’ve lost your fig leaf and your big flappy welch is there for all to see.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just give both of them badges for not organising a clear win/loss bet instead of some stupid line bet that can be argued about.

This honestly seems like the most sensible outcome. Except instead they can both pay up for two weeks and Bay 13 can be the real winner. :rainbow:

I thought we'd seen everything with Bay bets, but apparently not. :drunk: If you're going to do line bets floggos, be clear on your terms.

BloodRet and Bayer_, supply your sigs/avs for the other.
 
Lol ******* BS, this is a bigger rort than Nic Nat getting rubbed out for that tackle.

I wouldn't sulk if I were you, I'm rarely sympathetic to acts of gross stupidity like the one you displayed in not identifying what he obviously meant when he offered you a 5 goal line. You got very lucky.
 
source.gif
 
Yeah because I wasn't in the right here. :rolleyes:

Whatever, if a verdict couldn't be determined then so be it, I suppose that's a fair outcome.

Good result. I basically got you off the charge with some money in the poor box and 100 hours community service.

BTW, the invoice is in the mail.
 
N

Pics or it didn't happen...

You leave the Bay for a month if I do ?

**** oath... I'll go for two!!

Bewdy

Pic
Time stamped and all
View attachment 501716

See ya dick head

I posted this on another thread this morning

Talk about stupid




See ya in July !

View attachment 501727

And here’s one in the rain
See ya

Time / place stamped and I posted the first one on here before your mate opened his big mouth

At least he had the plums to take the bet after calling me a liar

Your just a gutless mouthy campaigner

Here ya go knob
Straight from my phone
View attachment 501743

You call that proof...lol. Ridiculous! I ain't goin' anywhere...

Thanks for the random google pics. I think I'll stay. Cheers anyway...

WELCHING PUFFER
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List of WELCHERS on Bigfooty

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top