It not Hird's role to say "no".
He's the coach of a football team, not a pharocological coach. How would he possibly know and be capable of making that decision?
Great wads of delusion there, methinks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It not Hird's role to say "no".
He's the coach of a football team, not a pharocological coach. How would he possibly know and be capable of making that decision?
Change the onus required and you might have a case. But other clubs worldwide have the same obligations to stay within legal drug regimes. The overwhelming majority do. Think about that....on the basis of a 70% likelihood we're guilty, not 99% as it should be.
I think it should be 50% - balance of probabilities. But we already know from McDevitt's public interviews that he intimates ASADA has confidence they will get a conviction even on a "beyond reasonable doubt" level of proof....on the basis of a 70% likelihood we're guilty, not 99% as it should be.
You certainly aren't a doctor!Okay, I'm not a doctor but for starters:
Cortisone
Advil
Aleve
IV drip
Vitamin B
Vitamin C
Specific painkilling injections
etc
We just dont get it. EFC are sacrificing themselves for the good of the game.Change the onus required and you might have a case. But other clubs worldwide have the same obligations to stay within legal drug regimes. The overwhelming majority do. Think about that.
Look, we've all got our heroes that we idolise. We want what is best for the game, and Australian sport overall, but James Hird is a legend of our club and I can't imagine him injecting drugs into our players.
If proven otherwise then we should sacrifice ourselves for the good of the game.
The problem though, is that Hird injected himself while on EFC grounds. He clearly had no issue with injections, so to suggest that he'd be against his players getting jabs, when he was doing it himself is wishful thinking.
There are rules against having any prohibited substances on club premises.I don't see any rules against coaches injecting themselves. LOL. This is such a long bow to draw it's hard not to laugh.
Yep, trafficking comes to mind.There are rules against having any prohibited substances on club premises.
Common sense comes to mind. Let alone anything more sinister.Yep, trafficking comes to mind.
AFL anti-doping code suggests otherwise.It's a different situation for coaches and players from my understanding.
1995*, f#@king kid brain.1995*
There are rules against having any prohibited substances on club premises.
AFL anti-doping code suggests otherwise.
7. OBLIGATIONS(to the WADA code)
7.1 All Players, Clubs, Officers and Officials must comply with and observe this Code
Just like your doping program huh?Everyone did it then, so it wasn't an advantage.
You better cross your fingers then.Weren't they off-site?
Coaches can inject themselves up to the eyeballs with steroids etc, as long as it's not on club premises. If Hird did it at home, it's okay legally.
It shouldn't be Hird's role, but it was because of the poor governance as highlighted by Ziggy.It not Hird's role to say "no".
He's the coach of a football team, not a pharocological coach. How would he possibly know and be capable of making that decision?
Why should it be? This is the framework that Essendon agreed to and signed up for. This isn't a court of law....on the basis of a 70% likelihood we're guilty, not 99% as it should be.
Its not much of an argument though is it? Carey was a legend of his club. Ablett was a legend of my club. More trust due to the back pocket players than the legends? I don't think Hird was an intentional drug cheat, but he lost control of a cutting edge program.( that involved injections)Look, we've all got our heroes that we idolise. We want what is best for the game, and Australian sport overall, but James Hird is a legend of our club and I can't imagine him injecting drugs into our players.
If proven otherwise then we should sacrifice ourselves for the good of the game.
You better cross your fingers then.
“In or about October 2011, Hird received, on Club premises, vials of Melanotan II and syringes from Club High Performance Coach Dean Robinson. Robinson instructed Hird how to self-administer injections of Melanotan II. Hird was aware that Robinson asked Hird no questions about his medical history prior to providing Hird with the Melanotan II and gave no advice as to any potential adverse reactions to the substance."
The report states that Hird made no adequate inquiries as to the substance he was being advised to inject himself with and did not inquire if Robinson was qualified or authorised to advise on the self-administration of injections.
The report says Hird also "made no inquiries as to whether the substance he was being provided with was or might be prohibited by the AFL Anti-Doping Code and the World Anti-Doping Code."
Where does it say that?- He didn't inject anything on club premises
- Anything in his own home is fair game
Where has he broken ASADA rules?
It shouldn't be Hird's role, but it was because of the poor governance as highlighted by Ziggy.
This is probably where the naivety came into it. A lack of experience too.
He should never have been in that position, but he was, and he made awful decisions.
The fault lies with a lot of people and they all bear responsibility. Dismissing Hird's failings is absurd.
Hird is also practically the only one left standing because he's the golden boy. Of course he's going to cop it.
Where does it say that?
It's good that you're making excuses for your ex-coaches love of jabbing himself though.
Ok are you pulling our leg?Good post...
I'm not sure what to believe really.
But I know Hird wouldn't lie to all of us loyal supporters through all this mess.
How are you pointing that out, when you're just making it up on the spot?I'm pointing out the he didn't break any ASADA rules.