Scandal Luke Slayers

[Osho]

It's novel that one can resign due to innocence. I think I'll have to get some guilt in my life to justify keeping my job, just to get with the Zeitgeist.

 

[Corn Cobbers]

Yeah fair. Entirely guesswork of course, but could be his wife got wind of an affair and was pissed enough to out it like this?

There's also daughters and servants, friends and other visitors, the family dog... plenty of potential scapegoats to save Lukey's "reputation"

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[bigaussie2025]

They can post a picture of Kane Cornes. Similar looking to Mr Sayers pic.

What do you mean ? Their ***** look similar ?? How do you know !?

 

[Pistol Night]

What do you mean ? Their ***** look similar ?? How do you know !?

Because they're both wrinkly knobs

 

[WillHayward]

Seems highly likely it was the wife that got wind of an affair and wanted to out them. Maybe in a pique.

Victoria police wouldn't be interested in pursuing a revenge pr0n charge against the wife given it all took place in Italy and even it was local the cops would need the victim (Luke) to make a statement saying it's his dick. So nothing in that.

 

[gambinotosserflog]

Don't you just love this image on the AFL website - you'd think Carlton had just won a three-peat. No frowning or scowling, it's as if he's cured cancer or something.

 

[gambinotosserflog]

The use of terminology saying 'compromised' instead of just saying 'hacked' seems weird to me.

A - He sent it, evidence showed it was sent by him but he's adamant it wasn't, so they just take his word and say it was somehow 'compromised'

B - Someone with access to his devices (Mrs) posted it

Yes I noted that too. Very careful language, 'hacked' would seem to have a very specific meaning that 'compromised' does not.

 

[western royboy]

As an Paper Boy of days long past i mourn the loss of bastions of integrity like the late “Melbourne Truth” in times like this

 

[Forever North]

Typical convenient AFL outcome. He must have a lot of interesting inside info regarding tax matters, ‘business dealings’ etc on the big knobs at AFL land….

 

[thegrach]

There's also daughters and servants, friends and other visitors, the family dog... plenty of potential scapegoats to save Lukey's "reputation"

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app

It worked for de Gooey... wait, what?

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Also stepping down from his business

Really done a number on himself

 

[Bont the Lord]

Also stepping down from his business

Really done a number on himself

Still owns the business and has his name all over it

 

[western royboy]

Still owns the business and has his name all over it

Don’t think he’s a sole owner and as to part two I’d say watch this space for an imminent name change and rebrand

 

[Flogwater]

After a "thorough" investigation, the AFL have concluded that Luke Sayers account was accessed by someone else whom posted the picture. Hmmm, did we expect any other outcome?

AFL: Hi Luke, did you post a picture of your cock online?

Luke: Um, no. It was someone else.

AFL: Ok, that's good enough for us. All clear.

A 'fiercely independent' investigation by the AFL's Integrity Unit. Would put Columbo to shame. Andrew Dillon is not afraid to make the tough calls.

Here's another plausible version of the investigation.

AFL: "Hi Luke. Did you post a lewd image of yourself on X?".

Luke: "You don't need to see my X metadata".

AFL: "We don't need to see your X metadata".

Luke: "This isn't the flaccid c*ck you're looking for".

AFL: "This isn't the flaccid c*ck we're looking for".

Luke: "I can go about my business".

AFL: "You can go about your business".

Luke: "Move along ... ".

AFL: "Move along. Move along!".

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Yeah fair. Entirely guesswork of course, but could be his wife got wind of an affair and was pissed enough to out it like this?

Hard to know but that was my first thought. That or someone in her family/group that knows their way around social media.

 

[Flogwater]

Definitely was "hacked" by the wife, who found out about the affair. Now has a conflict of interest with one of Carlton's major sponsors and can no longer be pres - all makes sense...

According to media reports, BUPA have "pulled out" of their sponsorship deal with the Blues. Not the most elegant turn of phrase in this case ...

 

[western royboy]

According to media reports, BUPA have "pulled out" of their sponsorship deal with the Blues. Not the most elegant turn of phrase in this case ...

Yet entirely appropriate

 

[Black Diamond]

You don’t know if he pulled out.

 

[Flogwater]

Shame, I thought he was doing a great job.

Andrew Dillon to Sayers: "Luke: get back in your f**king hole! Oh, Lukey. You're doing a good job."

 

[Redline]

Seems like the most likely scenario it was either his wife who has access or ex mistress who remembered the logon details. Something along those lines.

 

[Gavin Excell]

Wowee, I mean I've always thought he was as dodgey as , but, what on earth does this say about the AFL clearing him?
This is turning into just as big an embarrasment for the league as it is for Sayers.
No doubt, we can do without his type at the club but he was kind of getting things moving so I hope there is some sort of decent replacement. Never a dull moment at Carrrrrrrrrrrllllllton.

Because it's a negotiated agreement by the AFL and Sayers

AFL - We want you to step down and will.offer you the incentive of having an inquiry that clears you

It's classic AFL cynical outcome based justice

 

[My Tilly]

They're not paying Cooky enough for overseeing that rabble of an organization

 

[western royboy]

They're not paying Cooky enough for overseeing that rabble of an organization

Cooky is already headed for the Exit, Graham Wright must be thinking

 

[Jamie]

Luke Sayers - A Haiku

A sneaky Euro tweet
Oh! A flaccid penis pic
The Pres is now beat

 

[sabso]

Chief have sayers or the AFL legal team sent you a note to take this Fred down yet? If so get ready for it, this stinks of the biggest cover up out

Thread title does not match the name of the person in question. Therefore not actionable