Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aren't they saving that for 360?He was out for BLOOD. Haven't you seen the zoomed in, 3 angles of footage in slow motion in 4K????
fixedwalk in
Make an hour long compilation of umpires saying 'Stand!'
walk out
For those suggesting that what Lynch did was fair, IMO it's no different to Cameron doing this in 2018, except that Lynch didn't have the long run up, however he did opt to make contact with the opponent rather than contest the mark. Had Lynch put his hands up and at least contest the mark there wouldn't be an issue, but when you elect to make contact with the opponent and not contest the footy, you're always going to be in trouble.
For those suggesting that what Lynch did was fair, IMO it's no different to Cameron doing this in 2018, except that Lynch didn't have the long run up, however he did opt to make contact with the opponent rather than contest the mark. Had Lynch put his hands up and at least contest the mark there wouldn't be an issue, but when you elect to make contact with the opponent and not contest the footy, you're always going to be in trouble.
efawalk in
play the tape(dangerflog on vlas in 2020)
walk out
the AFL is in real trouble as a sport here. A player going for a marking contest and bracing for contact coming the other way is sent to Tribunal for suspension… bye bye to marking contests. the disciplinary system is totally rudderless… what a farking joke
You're allowed to brace for contact, however IMO the MRO believes that Lynch chose to bump instead of contesting the mark. Had he done that and made contact with Keath it would be classed as no other way to contest the ball and bad luck for Keath.So he's not allowed to brace for contact to protect his ribs, from a player coming back into a contest?? He saw him coming at the last minute and he had 2 choices, brace for contact and protect yourself, or leave yourself wide open for a bunch of broken ribs.
That this is even being considered as a "severe" incident is a massive joke in itself.
BTW I don't see how it is comparable with that of Cameron. If Cameron had continued with contesting the mark, Andrews would have just ran past him and there would have been incidental contact, Keath was moving INTO not across the marking contact. Cameron had nothing to protect, Lynch did.
Lynch was about to be part of a marking contest his arms should have been going up, instead he chose to tuck them and bump and that's the risk you take in todays game.if lunch put his arms up for no apparent reason he has some broken ribs to go with his broken foot
CrapYou're allowed to brace for contact, however IMO the MRO believes that Lynch chose to bump instead of contesting the mark. Had he done that and made contact with Keath it would be classed as no other way to contest the ball and bad luck for Keath.
As for being graded as severe, the MRO seem to label every concussion incident as severe as a means to establish some consistency in results.
As for the comparison with Cameron/Andrews, like Lynch Cameron never actually contested the mark and instead opted to take out the opponent, the fact he did it with an raised elbow is why he copped 6 weeks (IIRC). Lynch will probably cop 4 like Broad did and I have no issue with that, even if Lynch wasn't injured with the foot.
The AFL is going to continue trying to eliminate unneccary head contact where it can, unfortunately there will be incidents like what happened with Tom McCartin last night that are a result of contesting the ball, but when players are not choosing to contest the footy and simply bump an opponent players are going to run the risk
Book an appointment with spec savers.You're allowed to brace for contact, however IMO the MRO believes that Lynch chose to bump instead of contesting the mark. Had he done that and made contact with Keath it would be classed as no other way to contest the ball and bad luck for Keath.
As for being graded as severe, the MRO seem to label every concussion incident as severe as a means to establish some consistency in results.
As for the comparison with Cameron/Andrews, like Lynch Cameron never actually contested the mark and instead opted to take out the opponent, the fact he did it with an raised elbow is why he copped 6 weeks (IIRC). Lynch will probably cop 4 like Broad did and I have no issue with that, even if Lynch wasn't injured with the foot.
The AFL is going to continue trying to eliminate unneccary head contact where it can, unfortunately there will be incidents like what happened with Tom McCartin last night that are a result of contesting the ball, but when players are not choosing to contest the footy and simply bump an opponent players are going to run the risk
If he chooses to tuck his arms his intent is to bump.Gee wiz,
Brisbane players remonstrated.
Footscrays didn't . What does that tell you?
Also what was lynchs intent?
I've looked at the replay numerous times.
I don't get it.
His eyes are clearly on the ball until the last moment when he turns to brace for impact.
What has he done wrong?
Should Lynch have got a free for front on contact, seeing as though he was in the marking contest, and Keath was not?If he chooses to tuck his arms his intent is to bump.
Lions players remonstrated because Cameron led with a raised elbow. Lynch wasn't anywhere near as malicious, but in todays game, electing to bump when he had another option to contest to ball has cost him. I know it's not the popular opinion, but it's the way the game is being adjudicated now.
Ever seen players misjudge marks before?If he chooses to tuck his arms his intent is to bump.
Lions players remonstrated because Cameron led with a raised elbow. Lynch wasn't anywhere near as malicious, but in todays game, electing to bump when he had another option to contest to ball has cost him. I know it's not the popular opinion, but it's the way the game is being adjudicated now.
Lynch was about to be part of a marking contest his arms should have been going up, instead he chose to tuck them and bump and that's the risk you take in todays game.
Correct.The thing that will get him is he didn't contest for the mark. The trinunal will say he opted to bump than go for the mark.