- Banned
- #26
Tazz used to (on a regular occurance) use Scarlett as a stepladder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He's deteriorating by the week. Pencilling in a bag for Lloyd in round 10. That is if Scarlett bothers to have him as an opponent.
You are really losing all credibility as a poster here. It's not even worth arguing.He's deteriorating by the week. Pencilling in a bag for Lloyd in round 10. That is if Scarlett bothers to have him as an opponent.
A carlton best and fairest winner ????If Scarlett is a hack then what does that make Lloyd ???
Wah wah wah. Dry those tears.You are really losing all credibility as a poster here. It's not even worth arguing.
hmmm last week people were saying that Scarlett was Geelong's most important player after Hawthorn's surge in the last quarter when Scarlett was on the bench and now this week he is apparently a washed up hack whose flaws are masked by the abilities of the defenders around him. wtf is going on there?
Hale 8 goals on Scarlett.response to Kingsley's 7 goals on Fletcher.
Kent Kingsley kicked 7 goals on Dustin Fletcher when Essendon were good.
This is absolutely the dumbest troll I've ever read.
Hale 8 goals on Scarlett.
3 goals actually, but don't let the truth get in the way of a good argument hey?Hale 8 goals on Scarlett.
Facts are facts. 8 goals by his opponent, no amount of bitching about the umpires changes that. The fact that Scarlett had to be moved off him when getting bent over only furthers my point.Game, set and match.
More like 4 goals on Scarlo in 3 and a half quarters, with Hale having the favourtism of the umpires. But let's not have the facts get in the way of a s**thouse troll.
A carlton best and fairest winner ????
Scarlett was moved onto him after he'd kicked 4, and one of them was a soft free kick against Harry Taylor while Scarlett was rebounding. So Scarlett conceded 3 goals.Facts are facts. 8 goals by his opponent, no amount of bitching about the umpires changes that. The fact that Scarlett had to be moved off him when getting bent over only furthers my point.
Techincalities. At the rate he conceded goals on Hale it would have been 8.Scarlett was moved onto him after he'd kicked 4, and one of them was a soft free kick against Harry Taylor while Scarlett was rebounding. So Scarlett conceded 3 goals.
You're drowning.
3 goals in 2 and a half quarters - at that rate in a full game he would have conceded 4 or 5.Techincalities. At the rate he conceded goals on Hale it would have been 8.
When you break it down he was pantsed by a complete hack, while playing with the support of the midfield that possesses the ball more than any other team in history, meaning that the defence is under less pressure than any other team in history. Fletcher wouldn't have let his opponent get a touch if put in the same situation.
It's a technicality because it was more humiliating than any Fletcher performance, Kent Kingley or no Kent Kingsley.3 goals in 2 and a half quarters - at that rate in a full game he would have conceded 4 or 5.
And how is it a technicality that you said he got moved off Hale because he was getting beaten, when the truth is that he got moved on him because Taylor was getting beaten.
Still pulling bullshit out of your ass. Keep at it!
So conceding 3 goals to David Hale is more humiliating than conceding 7 goals to Kent Kingsley?It's a technicality because it was more humiliating than any Fletcher performance, Kent Kingley or no Kent Kingsley.
How did Fletcher go yesterday? I saw he was lined up on superstar power forward David Mundy
A half-fit Franklin towelled up Scarlett in Rd 1. 5 goals.