Maynard cleared by tribunal for Brayshaw collision

What should happen with Maynard?

  • 1-2 match suspension for careless, med-high impact, high contact

    Votes: 247 27.9%
  • 3-4 match suspension for intentional, med-high impact, high contact

    Votes: 203 23.0%
  • 5+ match suspension, intentional or careless with severe impact, straight to tribunal

    Votes: 68 7.7%
  • Charges downgraded to a fine

    Votes: 52 5.9%
  • No charge/no penalty

    Votes: 314 35.5%

  • Total voters
    884
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

THE AFL has opted against appealing the Tribunal's decision in the Brayden Maynard case, meaning the Collingwood defender is in the clear to play in the Magpies' preliminary final.


The AFL, having brought the charge against Maynard, said on Wednesday that it would not challenge the Tribunal's ruling, but would comment further later in the day.

"The AFL has confirmed that after careful consideration and review of the Tribunal's decision and reasons following last night's hearing into the incident involving Collingwood's Brayden Maynard and Melbourne's Angus Brayshaw, the AFL has decided not to appeal the Tribunal's decision," a statement read.

"Per the Tribunal Guidelines the AFL had to make this decision by 12:00pm AEST today.

"The AFL will release a further statement later today."
Finally some sanity 👍
 
Last edited:
It doesn't appear anywhere in the guidelines. It's used in discussion to show how aggressive a hip and shoulder was. It's not relevant here

If you follow the guidelines it is clearly careless conduct. It is murky because people don’t like that he’d be rubbed out for initially making a legitimate attempt at the ball. But that doesn’t make it not careless.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If you follow the guidelines it is clearly careless conduct. It is murky because people don’t like that he’d be rubbed out for initially making a legitimate attempt at the ball. But that doesn’t make it not careless.
No it isn't clearly careless conduct under the guidelines. It's extremely debatable, which is what is occurring in the Tribunal. Maynard has a pretty good case.
 
Yeah they can throw themselves. Real time saver
And energy saver. If they can throw themselves through the air at pace you can conserve yourself for other pursuits.
 
If Maynard gets off there will more kids told to play soccer by their parents imo.

True you might score a goal a game…and I hope parents know that heading the ball is part of soccer lol
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If you follow the guidelines it is clearly careless conduct. It is murky because people don’t like that he’d be rubbed out for initially making a legitimate attempt at the ball. But that doesn’t make it not careless.

If you follow the guidelines, McCartin should be suspended for concussing McKay. That was careless front on contact, severe impact, high contact.
 
Cant believe there are people blaming Brayshaw ffs.
That’s basically what Maynard’s counsel is basing this on, Brayshaw moving. It’s ****ing disgusting. The AFL should throw it out. Are they serious about head contact and concussions or Brayshaw moving about 8 inches to his right?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Maynard cleared by tribunal for Brayshaw collision

Back
Top