Harry Manback
Debutant
- Sep 7, 2009
- 120
- 4
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Maybe he has Uromysitisis and has been issued a public urination pass?
Brilliant.
/thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Maybe he has Uromysitisis and has been issued a public urination pass?
If I were in Stynes, Schwab and Bailey's position, I'd impose a 2 match penalty and be stripped off any leadership duties which is a pity because he's the closest thing that club has to a leader.
This is dead on - 1 match is enough though.
He is our only leader on the ground this year, very unfortunate.
No, no, no - definitely think 2 matches is required
If it was an Eagles player people would be all over this like white on rice
Maybe he meant to re-fill his glass, given that is usually the quality of beer served at some places.
He has been life-banned from a few establishments along with another Melbourne listed player for youthful indescretions in the past...so he has form.
Unacceptable.
Plus Pretty Please is a nice venue, so he should cop it.
At least he didn't do a Fraser Gherig.
It is true for sure Moloney must be lying to the Dees. What possible reason would a random person have to make up this story? Moloney what a ****.The urination incident did not occur.
Was drunk at the said bar, and was asked to leave.
Eligible to play next week, but has stepped down from the club's leadership group.
What kind of a world do we live in, when you can't rely on information from a talkback caller to a radio station, and the herald-sun
It is true for sure Moloney must be lying to the Dees. What possible reason would a random person have to make up this story? Moloney what a ****.
The cameras wouldn't cover 100% of the venue. The bouncer and staff may not have seen anything.The club reviewed CCTV footage, talked to the bouncer and the bar staff.
The footage showed nothing, Bar Staff said he did nothing, Bouncers said they asked him to leave and he left with out trouble.
Oh wait shit, let's trust the random talkback caller.
The urination incident did not occur.
Was drunk at the said bar, and was asked to leave.
Eligible to play next week, but has stepped down from the club's leadership group.
What kind of a world do we live in, when you can't rely on information from a talkback caller to a radio station, and the herald-sun
The "embarrassed" former vice-captain gave up the post
Yet that was enough to cost him the vice-captaincy of a club he grew up passionately following.
The penalty, surely, is too tough.
Well shit. If this is true, we're screwed! What the eff is the only good dee for the first 3 rounds doing at a bar at 2.30 in the morning?!
After the game is the best time to go out, they are allowed to have a life as well. Drinking so much that you can not control yourself is where the problem lies though.By the sound of it, making an absolute idiot of himself. I don't care what club he plays for, I just cannot believe footballers continue to go out and do these things. You'd think after all the examples of poor player behaviour over the past few years, an AFL player would at least think to himself, "Maybe this isn't such a good idea".
Edited for accuracy.If it was an Eagles player people would be all over this like white on ice
The cameras wouldn't cover 100% of the venue. The bouncer and staff may not have seen anything.
The club reviewed CCTV footage, talked to the bouncer and the bar staff.
The footage showed nothing, Bar Staff said he did nothing, Bouncers said they asked him to leave and he left with out trouble.
Oh wait shit, let's trust the random talkback caller.
The club reviewed CCTV footage, talked to the bouncer and the bar staff.
The footage showed nothing, Bar Staff said he did nothing, Bouncers said they asked him to leave and he left with out trouble.
I must be missing something here. If he did "nothing" whilst at the venue & left the venue when asked to leave, why the need for him to step down/be removed from the leadership group? On the basis of this version of events he should have nothing to answer for.