- Aug 21, 2016
- 12,356
- 13,160
- AFL Club
- Essendon
No leadership group? That’s a very strange decision
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
read that as we're still exploring options for LG.No leadership group? That’s a very strange decision
They said there’ll be no leadership group this season in the statement.read that as we're still exploring options for LG.
I'd wager Ridley and Redman based on the media comments. I reckon there'd be one more (Heppell?)
program i mean.They said there’ll be no leadership group this season in the statement.
That’s heaps of pressure on just 2 blokes in their first season in the role.
Ah he was voted in by team mates…If Merrett was a role player, say a work horse wingman or a small defender, would he be in the discussion as captain? I'm going to say almost certainly not.
Is there anything about his personality that he has conveyed publicly that make him suited to being captain?
This is dumb and is likely to do with the 6 year deal signed.
6 year deal signed
contractual commitments
I'm still convinced you only post here due to contractual commitments. You can't be this sour for real.If Merrett was a role player, say a work horse wingman or a small defender, would he be in the discussion as captain? I'm going to say almost certainly not.
Is there anything about his personality that he has conveyed publicly that make him suited to being captain?
This is dumb and is likely to do with the 6 year deal signed more than any particular suitability for the role.
And before the usual suspects start...stop. Coniglio and Fyfe are 2 poor recent captains who got the role as part of contractual commitments. So let's not pretend it doesn't happen.
Ah he was voted in by team mates…
He’s our only consistent performer. If mcgrath had turned into the player we hoped he would be, the role would be his. At this stage you couldn’t give it to him
bigger question is the lack of viable alternatives.If Merrett was a role player, say a work horse wingman or a small defender, would he be in the discussion as captain? I'm going to say almost certainly not.
Is there anything about his personality that he has conveyed publicly that make him suited to being captain?
This is dumb and is likely to do with the 6 year deal signed more than any particular suitability for the role.
And before the usual suspects start...stop. Coniglio and Fyfe are 2 poor recent captains who got the role as part of contractual commitments. So let's not pretend it doesn't happen.
i thought Cogs was partially contractual, partially they were toby-shy (i'd have appointed him tbh)If Merrett was a role player, say a work horse wingman or a small defender, would he be in the discussion as captain?
* no issue - he's our leading mid
Is there anything about his personality that he has conveyed publicly that make him suited to being captain?
* we just went through a period where some commentators suggested we had Cletus The Slack Jawed Yokel as our captain. A captain can lead by many examples. Personality doesn't have to be THE leading trait here.
This is dumb and is likely to do with the 6 year deal signed more than any particular suitability for the role.
* My choice was along the lines of Ridley. But in my heart of hearts it was always going to be Zach... contract or not
And before the usual suspects start...stop. Coniglio and Fyfe are 2 poor recent captains who got the role as part of contractual commitments. So let's not pretend it doesn't happen.
* Do we have a source on this... or is just your vibe?
I'm shocked to be sitting hereWell then. Flame away.
I would not have given the players voting privileges.
I didn't want to rain on his parade in his player thread but man this is a average choice, it feels like a vanilla choice for a vanilla club.
I understand that a lot of people feel like he was the "obvious choice" or even worse "the only choice" - if this is truly the case then our worst fears are about to be confirmed, because the dearth of leadership both on and off field at this club is a serious problem.
From the outside it feels like Essendon doesn't make brave choices anymore, we just toddle along hoping that we won't end up on the front/back page embarrassing ourselves yet again. It always feel like they don't want to be noticed.
This is the exact issue though isn't it?Who else was a legitimate choice?
Redman has only just established himself at AFL level, McGrath is VC and is changing roles to hopefully see him fulfil his draft position, Draper?
Merrett is the clear and obvious choice because there's simply a lack of choices right now. The hope would be in 2 years we have multiple viable options, my preference would be Hobbs. But Hobbs isn't ready now.
This is the exact issue though isn't it?
There are no leaders in the group - you only need to watch them on the weekend to realise that they've been rudderless for years.
We haven't recruited for it, and even if they would like to pretend they have, they certainly haven't developed it. It's plain to see with the revolving door leadership group they've had for however many years that there wasn't any standout candidates.
What I wouldn't give for a Cripps, Miller, Greene or Sicily type of character to emerge from our group.
On McGrath, people need to get over his draft position. The day after he was drafted that number became irrelevant. He has to live up to his own potential and the expectations on him are the same as every other player on the list. Pick 1 or SSP doesn't matter.
So players don’t get voting privileges yet you complained that some stars get given the role because they signed long contract extensionsWell then. Flame away.
I would not have given the players voting privileges.
Ah he was voted in by team mates…
Essendon undertook a leadership process under new Senior Coach Brad Scott that provided players the opportunity to identify the key values and qualities they want in their leaders. The squad and football staff then voted on candidates who best demonstrated these values before a recommendation was presented by the football department.Actually, no. Appointed (different approach as outlined).
Which is a good approach.
Actually, it's both. He was only appointed because he got voted onto the short-list.Actually, no. Appointed (different approach as outlined).
Which is a good approach.