- Jan 16, 2016
- 4,276
- 9,098
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
what a dropkickhttps://www.smh.com.au/national/gun...of-united-patriots-front-20151105-gkrk80.html
Another one from the lads Society
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what a dropkickhttps://www.smh.com.au/national/gun...of-united-patriots-front-20151105-gkrk80.html
Another one from the lads Society
"Edited Uploads"!! "Bad Actor": A person that attempts to lie, cheat, or deceive, in a poor manner.Facebook censured by government for failure to act on livestreaming concerns
By Fergus Hunter and Jennifer Duke March 26, 2019 — 6.47pm
https://amp.smh.com.au/politics/fed...n-livestreaming-concerns-20190326-p517sb.html
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
Hollywood has lots to answer for."Edited Uploads"!! "Bad Actor": A person that attempts to lie, cheat, or deceive, in a poor manner.
Hmmm. I've seen enough comments that say they think the footage was fake! As in a video game! As in no blood or fake blood! As in it was a big conspiracy and no one really died! Crisis actors being used!
This is absolute rubbish and I have enough contacts in Christchurch NZ to vouch this was a real life event and 50 people really did die.
It's unbelievable to me that some people think this, but the footage did seem strangely like a video game.
Is it possible that filters were used or the footage was edited in some way to in some uploads to encourage those thoughts?
That particular tweet from the head of fb cyber security just makes me think what sort of editing was done to the uploads. Not suggesting fb edited (I don't think I am), but could they have had filter etc added or parts deleted on some of the uploads to make them more game like and less real?Hollywood has lots to answer for.
These guys are disappointed there was no huge blood sprays on walls, gaping wounds , people flying backwards on being hit ( i thought Tarantino debunked that one)
That particular tweet from the head of fb cyber security just makes me think what sort of editing was done to the uploads. Not suggesting fb edited (I don't think I am), but could they have had filter etc added or parts deleted on some of the uploads to make them more game like and less real?
Vaguely related.
Investigative journalist Lara Whyte reports on the rise of the new wave of female hardline right-wing activists, a band of reactionary influencers gaining a huge online following
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0003twc
Yes to 1 and 5 and Don't know for the others.not really sure what you are trying to say here
but
1. fb are fantastic at collecting clients info(?)
2. fb are excellent at machine learning(?)
3. fb are brilliant at web based automated processes(?)
4. fb can do almost anything with technology
5. to make these visions look less real is kind of a mental sickness
imho
Bernadi was broadly for it but spoke against some of the rhetoric directed towards Anning. One nation abstained from the discussion . There was no actual vote. The motion passed the senate “on the voices”.Fraser Anning censure motion was passed by Senate on voices. Government + Labor + Greens + Hinch + Centre Alliance + Burston all in favour.
Only Cory Bernardi voted against. Fraser Anning wasn't in the chamber for the vote.
One Nation abstained.
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk