Imagine the Father-Sons he would produce!
All taken by Collingwood in a future rule change no doubt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imagine the Father-Sons he would produce!
Came here to post Peter Knights. At least aeriallyPeter Knights. Leigh Matthews. Gary Buckenara. Darren Jarman. Lance Franklin. Cyril Rioli.
In chronological order. Can't put Peter Hudson in because I only have vague memories of his 1977 season.
The title says “not the best or the most decorated pure talent”.I think Gary Ablett Sr is a particularly glib answer tbh, yes he was a star at Geelong but didn't demonstrate that talent with us. Almost everything that Sr was in the late 80s and 90s, Buddy was more and taller. Buddy as a prospect in that era would have set the all time goal kicking record at an unreachable level, the only thing you'd give Ablett an advantage in is marking.
Even with that, taking "talent" at its definition of natural aptitude - I'm going Cyril. The most naturally talented player, and the most technically brilliant at the most things. A phenomenal kick, the best tackler I've ever seen, he seemed to always make the best decisions quicker than any other player. His instincts to tap the ball to advantage, find teammates. Honestly I think some aspects of his game are underrated.
We can go back and forth on what "the most talented Hawk to ever play" means but I'd argue that picking a player who played one season and demonstrated very little of his talent at the Hawks is not in the spirit of the question.The title says “not the best or the most decorated pure talent”.
I thinks it’s pretty obvious - across his career he was the most astonishingly naturally talented player I’ve ever seen. The fact he only got his head right and showed it at Geelong is irrelevant given the criteria in the OP.
He played for Hawthorn, and he’s the most freakishly talented player I’ve ever seen.
Have to agree with you Senior was something else he shades Cyril ever so slightly. In full flight he was amazing to watch. Could dominate a game like no other. I can tell you if he had put in a lot more on the track, he would have been unstoppable he was bloody freak.The title says “not the best or the most decorated pure talent”.
I thinks it’s pretty obvious - across his career he was the most astonishingly naturally talented player I’ve ever seen. The fact he only got his head right and showed it at Geelong is irrelevant given the criteria in the OP.
He played for Hawthorn, and he’s the most freakishly talented player I’ve ever seen.
No current season stats available
Agree. Pound for pound talent, it's Jarman every day.It's not close. D Jarman is the most gifted/talented player I've seen play this game of football.
Did he bring his best as often as he should? Nope.
Sammy 2nd. Can't believe how far he took his game from early Box Hill days.
Some think that somehow diminishes the gifts he displayed, as though he was more trained and robotic with skills.
Anything but. Mitch looked so natural, had such awareness, was so creative.
But no one could do everything Jarman could do at his best.
I’d say Jarman too. Just wanted to give a bit of love to Hodgey as well as I’m not sure if he has been mentioned yet? I remember a game against the Bulldogs where he smothered the ball off the boot of a player, gathered it cleanly in the same action and then nonchalantly kicked a 60 metre barrel off one step!Agree. Pound for pound talent, it's Jarman every day.
No current season stats available
Natural talent obviously exists. It has been demonstrated consistently over the course of human history. It's not an excuse, it's just a fact - Mozart was a proficient musician by 5 and was composing as a teenager. You can take any number of children, give them all the lessons in the world and chances are that none scratch the surface of what he achieved.I don't think Talent exists. It's an excuse people use to explain why they can't do what others can.
There are some natural traits that impact what you achieve.
But if you look at 2015 Sam Mitchell you see one of the best kicks to ever play the game on either foot. Swap in 2002 Sam Mitchell and you have an elite inside ball winner who hacks it forward from packs and often misses targets.
Nobody is born with the ability to kick a football. And Jimi Hendrix wasn't born a talented guitarist.
Most of us spend a few years just learning how to walk and talk and not shit in our pants.
Talent doesn't mean someone is magically born with the ability to do something they've never done before. It just means that the amount of time and effort they need to put into learning and training the ability to reach a particular level of mastery is far less than most.I don't think Talent exists. It's an excuse people use to explain why they can't do what others can.
There are some natural traits that impact what you achieve.
But if you look at 2015 Sam Mitchell you see one of the best kicks to ever play the game on either foot. Swap in 2002 Sam Mitchell and you have an elite inside ball winner who hacks it forward from packs and often misses targets.
Nobody is born with the ability to kick a football. And Jimi Hendrix wasn't born a talented guitarist.
Most of us spend a few years just learning how to walk and talk and not shit in our pants.