
Which character?Then why are they fining players for dressing up as famous movie characters?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 21
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Which character?Then why are they fining players for dressing up as famous movie characters?
Gillis Trump impressions are the gereatestGillis, Normand, Carr, Kevin Burns for some. There are 100s funnier than Ari who is genuinely unfunny but is Joe's mate (also unfunny)
One in all in type situation. Once the AFL were drawn in to investigate, they had to act. If it was only movie characters and Twin Towers, I believe the AFL couldn't of looked at the incident and therefore was not obliged to act.Then why are they fining players for dressing up as famous movie characters?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yes, much like your “bloods” captain leading from the front when on the piss.Just the kind of strong club culture to keep Stringer in line.
Why the other fines then?That is incorrect. Legally speaking, due to the public nature of their position, whilst they are afforded annual leave, they do represent the club, the AFL and their own public image 24/7. The AFL can pull their morality or public image clauses whenever they like as soon as things are made public.
I believe AFL cares more about this than other issues because they really want to have a squeaky clean image when it comes to sexual misconduct and women. I am pretty confident that if there was no sex dolls, this wouldn't have been an issue for the AFL.
Leadership group not stopping itWhy the other fines then?
As I mentioned before, they wouldn't of investigated. Because they were drawn into looking at the incident they couldn't of just sat on their hands.Why the other fines then?
About 20 years ago a bunch of guys did a jackson five impersonation on hhis red faces . Harry connick jnr almost caused the show to close down as he was offended as a judgeThe most extraordinary part of this is Conor Idon being fined for doing a act from a popular movie that I would guess may on this board have watched many times. Tarantino treatment of a sensitive subjective is ironic, funny, moving at times but filled with gauge, over the top violence and mayhem. Its irreverent. For me I love his dialogue but sometimes the violence is too slapstick.
Now the AFL, in this case I will guess the majority of people involved in handing down sanctions are white middles class people. Obviously Dillon is. Its stunningly wrong to me that they feel they can judge a black man, who took the time to discuss this with the other black men before going ahead, for dressing up as a black character to do a scene from Django.
This is a serious overstep by the AFL and too me extremely ignorant. They have no right to make this judgement.
One thing you'll notice watching Tarantino movies is the way violence is portrayed towards victims vs perpetrators is completely different. The slapstick violence is reserved for the latter. For the former he's actually a lot more reserved and shies away from showing it in an exploitative way, often it's more suggestive and disturbing.The most extraordinary part of this is Conor Idon being fined for doing a act from a popular movie that I would guess may on this board have watched many times. Tarantino treatment of a sensitive subjective is ironic, funny, moving at times but filled with gauge, over the top violence and mayhem. Its irreverent. For me I love his dialogue but sometimes the violence is too slapstick.
Now the AFL, in this case I will guess the majority of people involved in handing down sanctions are white middles class people. Obviously Dillon is. Its stunningly wrong to me that they feel they can judge a black man, who took the time to discuss this with the other black men before going ahead, for dressing up as a black character to do a scene from Django.
This is a serious overstep by the AFL and too me extremely ignorant. They have no right to make this judgement.
Yes. He should honestly sue them to expose their idiocy and hypocrisy. I bet the dimwits responsible for this decision wouldn’t be able to even locate Ghana on a map, let alone recall anything about how it - the place where his family is from - was affected by slavery.The most extraordinary part of this is Conor Idon being fined for doing a act from a popular movie that I would guess may on this board have watched many times. Tarantino treatment of a sensitive subjective is ironic, funny, moving at times but filled with gauge, over the top violence and mayhem. Its irreverent. For me I love his dialogue but sometimes the violence is too slapstick.
Now the AFL, in this case I will guess the majority of people involved in handing down sanctions are white middles class people. Obviously Dillon is. Its stunningly wrong to me that they feel they can judge a black man, who took the time to discuss this with the other black men before going ahead, for dressing up as a black character to do a scene from Django.
This is a serious overstep by the AFL and too me extremely ignorant. They have no right to make this judgement.
What sort of loser dresses up in a costume enacting the September 11 bombings??? Thank god they went out straight sets. Losers galore.
That is not political correctness, that is just disgraceful.
I am the last person who believes in the laughable crazy political correctness from people getting constantly offended on other peoples behalf, but this is not that.
You don’t go around dressing yourself up as a terrorist attack… very low character
Agree 100% with this, the SA stuff is totally egregiousIdun asked for permission first and he's black himself.
The rape stuff absolutely should be condemned but I can't believe Idun is attracting any sort of punishment for Django.
Dangerous precedentLeadership group not stopping it
Wacky wednesday will be mild mondayDangerous precedent
LOL. Nice rational argumentAnd how anyone could take exception to epidemic being used to describe how big an issue DV is in Australia is staggering. Not gonna botner with the whataboutism that follows. Your clear views on this topic tells me you're someone I want absolutely nothing to do with, so peace out.
they are referred as the "tolerant left"for a reasonNo surprise here that the only ones offended by this and backing the AFL are also the worst type of people imaginable. A roll call of the worst of the worst in this thread, a bunch of chronically online losers who will wax on about standards and morality while probably charging back their Uber Eats order despite there being nothing wrong with it or taking gift cards out of the wishing well at a friends wedding. Bottom of the barrel individuals who just want others to feel the pain that they have in their hearts. Sick
So because the afl accept gambling revenue, they are precluded from having an opinion on anything else, right?
Weird response, most reasonable people have a lot of respect for those who defend our country and freedom.Close to 200 million people were killed in wars in the 20th century and we've been lampooning them for decades.
Have a bex and a lie down.