TradeDraft
Post-Human
Problem is Eddie hates sacking his mates.
Bucks is on his Last Chance this season
Bucks is on his Last Chance this season
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
he is injured againReid should play rd1. Already played two vfl games (one internal praccy actually) and i think we play richmond on thursday. If he gets through a full game, bring him in. we need him badly
Scharenberg threadThe thing I'm most disappointed about is not playing Braydon Maynard. A tough defender that can kick the ball.
Eddie. You have done a lot of good for this football club. You rescued us in the 90s when we were in the shithouse and brought in the best coach in the afl who ultimately took us to the highest glory. While we only won one flag (at least we won one), the years we enjoyed under Malthouse were great. We enjoyed going to the football each week because we had young players who were developing in front of our eyes and we played a brand of football which was attractive.
However, your decision in 2009 to sack the best coach in the AFL was a shocker. It just should never have been done. To sack Malthouse for an untried Buckley, who no one knew if he could coach or not, is looking more ludicrous by the day. The warning signs should have been there when you think back to Buckley's first couple of years as captain where the other players did not gravitate to him.
The football we are playing under Buckley is disgusting. I take the point that last night and last week was a NAB cup game and that it means nothing. However, all the problems from the previous few years were there for all to see last night e.g. unable to move the ball out of our backline from kick ins, absolutely no forward structure and a lack of dare when attacking. I think I counted at one stage last night 10 disposals for about 15m gained.
Team selection is also bewildering. It is a NAB cup game, yet we see none of De Goey, Freeman, Kennedy or Broomhead last night. Why aren't the talented kids playing last night? Surely the best way to develop them is to expose them to football at the highest level. Instead, we have plodders in Greenwood and Varcoe getting a game over them (two players who should never have been recruited).
Eddie - for you to move Buckley on would mean that you are admitting you were wrong to appoint him. We as a supporter group can cop that as your good deeds far outweigh your bad. However, we cannot cop you continuing to be stubborn and to persist with a guy who, quite frankly, isn't up to it.
Mark Ricciuto made the tough, some would say ruthless, call at Adelaide to get rid of Sanderson. Whilst they were not that bad, he saw that he was not the man to take Adelaide forward and he acted swiftly. This is what we need at Collingwood.
And if you really cared about Collingwood, you would end your feud with Malthouse and pick up the phone and invite him back to a job that he should never have lost. Now I know that is asking too much from you, as sacking Buckley would be hard enough. Nonetheless, it is the right thing to do for this football club.
I would also appreciate that this thread is not moved or deleted, and that people only with constructive things to say contribute to it. Dismissive two or three word replies just show that some of you are blind supporters who can't think constructively or wouldn't dare criticise the club.
The rest of his post was good. I always ignore any references to succession plans and MM. Past is the past. The drivel of others is ludicrous and shows that we would go under as a club if this board run the football club.God there's some absolute drivel posted on this board.
Some joker actually wants to sack Buckley and re-employ MM???
Ffs, I've heard it all now.
I like practice matches
Why do we still act like these games actually ******* matter? History shows they mean nothing.
I don't understand why Cloke is getting hate. He's the one who should be giving the hate! We can't kick to him even if it's a 2 on 1 let alone a 1 on 1! He's always got atleast 3 opponents on him because of our poor forward line structure and our slow movement. Not only do we kick to him when he's in a 3 on 1 contest we can't even deliver a half decent ball to Cloke on the lead because our skills are that bad. So what is Cloke suppose to do? I feel sorry for him, he should've taken the big money Freo offered him, atleast he'd be given the ball without having to compete in a 3 on 1 and could actually get a decent kick to mark on the lead.
So after I hoped we would' get embarrassed....we got embarrassed.
I didn't get to watch the game, luckily I had naked women al up in my face. Which looks like it was the better entertainment. So are we basically bottom 4 this year?
Do me a favour and read the BF Collingwood board in 2009. You'd be surprised to learn majority of threads during that time are by posters calling for Mick's head and questioning what little game plan we have and how many spuds are in the team.
Glad Eddie didn't take any notice of Bigfooty threads back then.
Reid should play rd1. Already played two vfl games (one internal praccy actually) and i think we play richmond on thursday. If he gets through a full game, bring him in. we need him badly
The decision to move MM on was correct, I was a big supporter of Bucks and still think he can turn it around if he bites the bullett and goes the youth track.
But I think where we as a club err'd was not interviewing other candidates at the time or poach other coach (Clarkson was on outer with Hawks president at time), we went straight to default in ex club champ need not look elsewhere. IMO that was the clubs biggest mistake not moving Mick on but not looking for the best replacement.
Buckley imo also would of benefited a lot more doing his apprenticeship at another team and more so would of been better off head coaching at north then going with his heart and staying at Pieland where he was a peer to some of the playing group not too long ago.
I'm sure its been said elsewhere in the thread (I haven't read past this page cos its a sunny day here and I'm not gonna waste much more time online) BUT:
1. Tooves and Frost CAN'T be played together in the back half, they confuse everyone else with their poor disposal and indecisive running. So pick one of them (if you have to) and leave the other one out. I'll have Tooves in, Frosty just isn't an AFL KPP...he might make a back pocket (spoiler) if someone can teach him how to kick. And Tooves will probably get the same treatment as Tarks got when Scharenburg or Seedsman is ready to play.
2. Goldy and Blair CAN'T be played in the same forward line. They don't make a difference to the game, despite their desperation and effort. Pick one (if you really really have to) and don't let them play unless they can average 2 goals a game. We have better options now (De Goey for one, Karnesis another, Kennedy, Broomhead....Give the kids a go).
3. Realise that lightweight ruckmen have no hope against a man mountain like Minson. He is the Darren Jolly of this era and poor Grundy couldn't move him, jump over him or even run away from him. Witts has to be played against Minson next time and he must be willing to crash into and body the Bulldog rucks. Or we could try third man up tactics if Witts could at least tie up Minson. But last night the big Bulldog killed us.
4. Crisp did a good job when he came on and tried tagging Bonti. Sidebottom ran his usual miles but was fumbly, Elliot did OK but I wish he'd just shot at goal instead of trying to give off goal attempts, Pendles looked a bit shell shocked by the Bulldogs attack on the ball, Oxley and Ramsay tried hard but were fighting the tide. No CHB....they owned the corridor, they taught us a lesson about intensity and desire.
All in all it was a lesson I hope our guys don't quickly forget.
We need to pick a better balanced side for round 1....and then rev up our intensity. Otherwise the Lions will laugh at us too.
You would think that the coaching staff would take positives and negatives out of the game. Would they take much, if any, notice of the final result? Wouldn't have thought so.
You play them because they're more beneficial than intra-club training and they help ease clubs into the competitive season. That doesn't mean that it's an accurate predictor of how the real season will go.
That's just pointless rhetoric. Case in point - in the final round of the 2011 H&A season Collingwod lost by 96 points while West Coast won by 95 points. If you're "only as good as your last game" then how come Collingwood won the qualifying final between the two clubs the following week?
I see your point and for individual, likely fringe, players it might mean something to them. My point though is that practice matches branded as NAB whateveryouwannacallit do not accurately predict the season proper. Bucks also mentions in his presser that we got done by 70 points in round 1, lost again two weeks later then went up and beat Sydney in Sydney then went on with it. If I was to sum up the vibe of his presser, it would be along the lines of - "we haven't performed exactly how we wanted to but we still give ourselves an excellent chance of starting our season off well on April 4". Which comes back around to my point, practice matches don't predict H&A season matches. The fact that people want Buckley sacked (going off the poll in the analysis thread) off the back of a practice match is a joke.
He hasnt yet demonstrated he's picked up the pace. He was just okay in his first intra club, wasn't terrible but wasn't great in the vfl game against Geelong and didn't do heaps in Fri night's vfl intra.The thing I'm most disappointed about is not playing Braydon Maynard. A tough defender that can kick the ball.
Lmfao can't believe these reactions for a practice match.. Doggies would have given it their all knowing to sell memberships they need to give there fans hope.
Can't wait for all you sooks to be back on board once we start winning a few
He hasnt yet demonstrated he's picked up the pace. He was just okay in his first intra club, wasn't terrible but wasn't great in the vfl game against Geelong and didn't do heaps in Fri night's vfl intra.
Hes just not ready yet. They need to find the balance between giving him exposure/experience and not killing his confidence. Ive seen all three of his games and im with the club on this one - he's not ready........but when he is, watch out!!!!!
If they don't matter then why bother playing them. Just do all your pre season in house.
Lmfao can't believe these reactions for a practice match.. Doggies would have given it their all knowing to sell memberships they need to give there fans hope.
Can't wait for all you sooks to be back on board once we start winning a few
Kennedy, Broomhead and Degoey didn't play. Kennedy was crook and got a knock to his head last week, not sure about the other two-im assuming Degoey was rested. Abbott didnt do heaps, Freeman was good again and i think is ready. Goodyear's inside game was very promising and website said this;How did Goodyear, Abbott and Degoey go mate?
Any look ready?
What about our other draftees in Freeman, Kennedy, Broomhead etc they step up?