Roast NAB Rising Star Round 9 - Jake Carlisle

[My2Cents]

Apparently down at AFL house, 13 possessions against GWS is better than 11 possessions 3 goals against Brisbane.

Is there a lottery or something to pick this thing each week? What a load of tripe.

 

[micky_11]

Apparently down at AFL house, 13 possessions against GWS is better than 11 possessions 3 goals against Brisbane.

Is there a lottery or something to pick this thing each week? What a load of tripe.

apparently being eligible is better then not being eligible.

 

[Thewlis Dish]

It's more because he's played five solid games in a row, in a good side. Don't think anyone really stood out this week, and when that happens they tend to reward someone consistent.

 

[My2Cents]

apparently being eligible is better then not being eligible.

He is eligible.

To be eligible to be nominated for the award, a player must be younger than 21 years of age on 1 January of the award year and have played 10 or fewer senior games before the beginning of the season.

 

[Spitta09]

apparently being eligible is better then not being eligible.

Black not eligible at 21 years old and 2 games? Shuey was last year I think

 

[micky_11]

He is eligible.

To be eligible to be nominated for the award, a player must be younger than 21 years of age on 1 January of the award year and have played 10 or fewer senior games before the beginning of the season.

I think you will find Aaron Black turned 21 last year. Get back to me.

 

[Fart Cummings]

is it 21 and younger or younger than 21?

 

[My2Cents]

I think you will find Aaron Black turned 21 last year. Get back to me.

Yep. Shit thread.

 

[Elite Master]

The brutal truth of the matter is: not often do our younger first year players have blinding individual performances, and when/if they do, they get overlooked because they play for North.

 

[micky_11]

Yep. Shit thread.

Pays to know your club and players.

 

[Kcrack]

Stupid thread. Ammo for Essendon to now talk shit.

 

[giantroo]

Micky makes his comeback.

 

[My2Cents]

Pays to know your club and players.

You got a players age right mate, you didn't win the Nobel prize.

Keep it in your pants, hero.

 

[micky_11]

Micky makes his comeback.

Haha GR I always quietly watch proceedings.

 

[Spitta09]

The brutal truth of the matter is: not often do our younger first year players have blinding individual performances, and when/if they do, they get overlooked because they play for North.

The truth of the matter is that it is a dumb award. The business of 10 games before the start of the season is crap, should be at least 20 or so that way there are more players eligible.

 

[micky_11]

You got a players age right mate, you didn't win the Nobel prize.

Keep it in your pants, hero.

Your two cents worth tonight was poor

He is eligible.

To be eligible to be nominated for the award, a player must be younger than 21 years of age on 1 January of the award year and have played 10 or fewer senior games before the beginning of the season.

Especially when you continually feed me with incorrect details. Just research before you post.

 

[giantroo]

Haha GR I always quietly watch proceedings.

Fair enough

 

[The Gentleman]

This is terrible by the AFL, Carlisle should never have won, But I don't think black should have won either,
I can't believe they choose Carlisle over a player who was in the same game and got 25 disposals 6 tackles and 1 goal, Adam Treloar played outstanding and was the best young player of the week by a mile.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

The brutal truth of the matter is: not often do our younger first year players have blinding individual performances, and when/if they do, they get overlooked because they play for North.

have you never had an RS nom??

 

[DarkPhoenix]

Embarassing thread

 

[year of the roo]

Embarassing thread

Yep. Didn't start well and micky's contribution wasn't one for the ages either. Bin it mods

 

[AGC]

Change it to "16 possessions and 4 marks whilst keeping your opponent goalless."
I mean it'd be a shitly made argument, but at least you'd be factually correct and within the rules.

 

[VelvetSledge]

This is terrible by the AFL, Carlisle should never have won, But I don't think black should have won either,
I can't believe they choose Carlisle over a player who was in the same game and got 25 disposals 6 tackles and 1 goal, Adam Treloar played outstanding and was the best young player of the week by a mile.

Being honest I thought Treloar would get it, was GWS' best player. Carlisle has been good all season so I can see why he'd get it but the timing seemed a bit odd.

 

[sammie]

I wouldn't worry too much. Black will have plenty of chances over coming weeks...

 

[Lance Uppercut]

I can't believe Liam Anthony didn't get it, personally