Nathan Thompson

[Geelong Fella]

i was just wondering if anyone would pick up nathan thompson. I thought North didn't give him enough time to get back from injury. He's 30, but i reckon could play 1 or 2 more seasons. He'd be perfect for a team close to a premiership who need a forward. What do other people think, it would a gamble but it might work

 

[chef]

He's uncontracted, so why not just draft him?

 

[Geelong Fella]

yeh i don't mean in trade week

 

[chef]

yeh i don't mean in trade week

It could be an option if the Dogs miss out on a key forward in trade week.

 

[Geelong Fella]

yeh that's what i was thinking, he'd be good for dogs, just that extra forward they need

 

[Bring-Back-Powell]

He's uncontracted, so why not just draft him?

Would be Jade Rawlings mark II.
Don't do it Dogs!

 

[chef]

He'd probably be better then most of the crap bandied around for trades.

 

[Collins-Langford-Ayres]

Would have thought the Dogs or Saints should consider.

 

[Willow_2000]

Well he just came out and said hes not going to look for a new home next yr.

We have seen the last of him.

 

[chef]

Would be Jade Rawlings mark II.
Don't do it Dogs!

Agree with that, they need to keep their draft picks and keep taking kids.

 

[dipper86]

Would be Jade Rawlings mark II.
Don't do it Dogs!

What not being able to kick straight.

 

[HODGE2SEWELL]

1year on 250k i think doggies could pick him up

 

[The Doctor]

$120k more like it.

 

[HODGE2SEWELL]

$120k more like it.

doubt the flog would go for that low wage

 

[4blues]

Agree with that, they need to keep their draft picks and keep taking kids.

You would take him in the PSD, at least you know what your getting and he is alot better than Rawlings.

 

[chef]

You would take him in the PSD, at least you know what your getting and he is alot better than Rawlings.

He would take the spot of a kid on our list no matter where we take him and we have enough players who will be retiring over the next two seasons(5 i think.)