News New Jumpers for 2021

[Storm20]

Some higher-res pics. The side panels are faux panels, as in the design doesn't follow the stitching. Which would lead to me calling it a 'wrap-around' or '5-stripe' design rather than saying they are side panels. A bit like the Pies clash jumper of the early 2010s. It also appears that the brown is the same colour across the board.

This would be incredible as a template for competitions

 

[Supreme_Chancellor]

Props to Adidas for changing it up a bit. Interesting how they seem to be using the New Balance collar though?

 

[lionbear]

Thought we might get an announcement by Collingwood today for the draftee photos tonight?

 

[MegaBob]

Thought we might get an announcement by Collingwood today for the draftee photos tonight?

Not quite sure what the delay is, Sydney have made the same jump from ISC to Nike and have been out for a while, while still nothing from Collingwood at all.

 

[Rickee]

Idiots - St Kilda are now allowed to have four sponsors on guernsey instead of the standard two. Ridiculous.
Front under collar sponsor should not be allowed at all, should just be upper back if club is having extra sponsor. Saints fans should be kicking up a fuss over their guernsey becoming a NRL-esque billboard rather than over the white being slightly too thin

We realise we need the money. It's far easier to make the white stripe an inch wider on each side that to come up with the tens of millions of dollars we need to compete with the top sides without sponsorship.

I could personally care less how many sponsors we have if it keeps the club alive and competitive.

 

[Bugsy Brown]

Not quite sure what the delay is, Sydney have made the same jump from ISC to Nike and have been out for a while, while still nothing from Collingwood at all.

Maybe they did the deal later? Are we 100% certain it is Nike and not Puma or another manufacturer?

 

[acm21]

Maybe they did the deal later? Are we 100% certain it is Nike and not Puma or another manufacturer?

For me if it gets as much traction as it has on here. I put the chance at 85% of it being nike. It's also going to be a massive deal that includes multiple parts of the club.

 

[juddy_Like]

We realise we need the money. It's far easier to make the white stripe an inch wider on each side that to come up with the tens of millions of dollars we need to compete with the top sides without sponsorship.

I could personally care less how many sponsors we have if it keeps the club alive and competitive.

But if Ferrari came to you and asked for you to run out in an all red setup with a prancing horse on it for $5mill a year, would you do it?

I get your point but for some of us, it’s actually really annoying (in a weird, most likely sad way).

 

[acm21]

But if Ferrari came to you and asked for you to run out in an all red setup with a prancing horse on it for $5mill a year, would you do it?

I get your point but for some of us, it’s actually really annoying (in a weird, most likely sad way).

Its stkilda, they would play naked if they were given enough money.

 

[Gibbsy]

Close-up look at the Adelaide O'Neills polo.

 

[SomeNorthFan]

Melbourne Storm announce Castore as its new manufactuter, could they be coming for the AFL anytime soon?

 

[acm21]

Melbourne Storm announce Castore as its new manufactuter, could they be coming for the AFL anytime soon?

Rumour is west coast will also be with castore

 

[se17enteen]

 

[Storm20]

I wouldn't be surprised if Nike x Collingwood are holding off until supporter apparel is ready to order at the same time as the launch release!

 

[brucetiki]

Close-up look at the Adelaide O'Neills polo.

That doesn't look too bad

I was expecting these to be bad, but I didn't think they'd be this terrible!

 

[Teen Wolf]

Or until the signage at the Nike Performance Centre is installed. Or all the above, and more.

 

[Syxx]

The Annual Member Forum is on Monday. It's virtual this year but there has obviously been a lot of disgruntled fans over the last few weeks. Might be a good idea to keep some good news up their sleeves. If legit, sounds like a significant deal for the club. Nike Performance Centre, new jumpers and new supporter gear and maybe the re-signings in Nike gear on display. All guess work by me but could be why there is a bit of a hold-up.

 

[Nickimus Rex]

That doesn't look too bad



I was expecting these to be bad, but I didn't think they'd be this terrible!

Much like Classic - I do not like the sekem logo

 

[Lagooner]

I reckon those Sekem efforts look fine. The collar reminds me of ISC 2013-15.

 

[kid_a]

I reckon those Sekem efforts look fine. The collar reminds me of ISC 2013-15.

agreed, I'm pleasantly surprised

 

[TY24]

Idiots - St Kilda are now allowed to have four sponsors on guernsey instead of the standard two. Ridiculous.
Front under collar sponsor should not be allowed at all, should just be upper back if club is having extra sponsor. Saints fans should be kicking up a fuss over their guernsey becoming a NRL-esque billboard rather than over the white being slightly too thin

I’d rather have a billboard jumper and survive as a club than go bankrupt because we wanted a clean jumper and turned down the extra sponsorship money.

Perspective is important in times like this.

 

[Saint Mick]

Hate to break it to you but every club has a sponsor under the collar, it’s just that the Saints and Suns have non apparel manufacturers. As for the upper back, I’d be surprised if the Saints are the only team that is permitted to do this.

Idiots - St Kilda are now allowed to have four sponsors on guernsey instead of the standard two. Ridiculous.
Front under collar sponsor should not be allowed at all, should just be upper back if club is having extra sponsor. Saints fans should be kicking up a fuss over their guernsey becoming a NRL-esque billboard rather than over the white being slightly too thin

 

[SC26]

Hate to break it to you but every club has a sponsor under the collar, it’s just that the Saints and Suns have non apparel manufacturers. As for the upper back, I’d be surprised if the Saints are the only team that is permitted to do this.

Apparel supplier logo belongs there, nothing else.

 

[LeeARM]

Apparel supplier logo belongs there, nothing else.

Yeah, I'd actually prefer it if St Kilda kept their supplier under the collar and put Dare under the AFL logo.
...I know I will regret saying that when AFL jumpers turn into billboards like NRL jerseys.

 

[acm21]

Hate to break it to you but every club has a sponsor under the collar, it’s just that the Saints and Suns have non apparel manufacturers. As for the upper back, I’d be surprised if the Saints are the only team that is permitted to do this.

I think in this respect its more the comment form the saints that Pepper money will be moving to the top back of the jumper, with an additional sponsor on the front of the away and lower back of the home kit (assuming that deliveroo logo will be on the lower back of the away kit).

Im personally not sure about whether anyone else should take the collar spot other than an apparel company, but if someone is going to offer you more to take up that sot, compared to the apparel company/partner i guess you have to take it (especially if someone like nb or isc arent willing to give you anything)