Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Always thought the WADA appeal to CAS was more likely. No point in appealing to a corrupted organisation like the AFL.
‘In the interests of transparency, I would welcome the fullest possible release of the Tribunal’s findings and reasons on all of these matters,’ said Mr McDevitt.
that seems to imply that the tribunal is withholding part of the judgment
Presumably he means the reasons to be released 'publically' - I mean, they wouldn't have withheld the reasons from ASADA(???). Forget I asked, that's dumb.‘In the interests of transparency, I would welcome the fullest possible release of the Tribunal’s findings and reasons on all of these matters,’ said Mr McDevitt.
that seems to imply that the tribunal is withholding part of the judgment
ASADA unhappy about others withholding information?‘In the interests of transparency, I would welcome the fullest possible release of the Tribunal’s findings and reasons on all of these matters,’ said Mr McDevitt.
that seems to imply that the tribunal is withholding part of the judgment
Presumably he means the reasons to be released 'publically' - I mean, they wouldn't have withheld the reasons from ASADA(???). Forget I asked, that's dumb.
Presumably Mr Mac is talking to the world at large rather than the tribunal. Isn't it up to the parties to release the findings?
Any chance of the case tabled against the players being tabled? Or do we just accept McDevestateds word that it was very strong despite being knocked out of the park and not being appealed on?ASADA unhappy about others withholding information?
many lols I just had.
More like they dont have faith in a corrupt AFLlol ASADA doesn't even have faith in their case!
lol ASADA doesn't even have faith in their case!
Whats with this corruption nonsense?If WADA don't appeal, are they also corrupt?
It's was very, very strong. We should have taken the deal.Any chance of the case tabled against the players being tabled? Or do we just accept McDevestateds word that it was very strong despite being knocked out of the park and not being appealed on?
So if WADA don't appeal what is your summation then?you dont understand how this works
AFL are corrupt because they didn't find the players guilty.Whats with this corruption nonsense?
Haven't you heard? The independent tribunal which prior to March 31 were beyond reproach apparently fixed the verdict to suit the AFL.Whats with this corruption nonsense?
So if WADA don't appeal what is your summation then?
Edited for accuracyHaven't you heard? The independent tribunal which prior to March 31 were beyond reproach fixed the verdict to suit the AFL.