- Aug 21, 2016
- 12,356
- 13,160
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Well those guys survived the 2020 cull because they were still in contract…The gutting is in the form of Atley, Marley Williams, McMillan, Dumont, Wood, McMillan Pittard, Brown and Durdin (who they never really played). Did they not offer Tarrant a deal or did Tarrant want to leave? I'll grant that Dom Tyson was broken.
Atley is Heppell's age and essentially played 240 games straight from his debut. McMillan and McMillan Pittard were 28/29. The rest had 100 games in them at least.
Who survives the 2020 cull (which Atley was not part of)? Taylor Garner, an injured flake, Polec, another flake and Kayne Turner (the worst player in the AFL).
And it's not like every kid on the list is compelling.
McMillan, Dumont and Atley were pros. Wood and Durdin had ability. Trade Brown for something, I get that. I even get letting Tarrant leave to win a flag.
It seems that average age and games played is only run out when it helps to make a partisan point.
If you allow for years on a list to equate roughly to games played there is the equivalent of 800 games experience (give Durdin 100 ish and the same for Wood). You then go to North's current bottom 5, including Polec who you just sack because he's a flake and you're not worried about salary cap, and remove them.
What is the total effect of that by round 17 2022? It's got to be significant, doesn't it? Is playing Perez and Spicer now that important?
There is then the debacle of key position recruiting and development I've gone in to elsewhere.
They've blown themselves up. The AFL should step in as an administrator because North's profitability is based on handouts anyway. No one should be allowed to survive what has happed (now that they'll ge appointing a 4th senior coach in 4 years, etc).
Mcmillian, atley etc were terrible, not making on difference to the teams afl perform, only thing they could offer would be some experienced heads at vfl level. Horrible recruiting and list management got them to the spot they were in, as what usually happens with most clubs that need to rebuild
Tarrant was offered a 1 year deal, Richmond offered 2. To be fair Tarrant probably only deserved one, body is starting to fail, the lure of playing in a better team is hardly north’s fault. How many 32yos get 2 year deals from their current club. It would be same sort of scenario of Walker decided to leave Adelaide, they only offered him 1 year and he decided to be a 1 club player.