Autopsy North v Cats

Remove this Banner Ad

Dont wanna take anything away from dangers game cause it was brilliant but why does 48 possessions automatically equal a great game? Rockliffe got the same amount playing for that rabble that got flogged by carlton.

come on Boomerfan it's a bit like when Peaky got flown in on the helicopter, but Dangerfield can actually play, let them be excited.;)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

**** me. People carrying on about Dal Santo being injured like he wasn't playing.

He played 82% of the game and had 21 touches. That is more game time than Swallow, Ziebell and Cunners average every week.

To put it in perspective he was in our top 5 possession gatherers, only Gibson 34, Wells 31, Ziebell 22, and JMac 22 had more.
You can have possies but not have damaging possies.......I think many are commenting on, in which Dal Santo is very good at. On route relay type possessions.
 
How was the decision where Thommo got front position and then be grabbed from behind and thrown out of the way so the Geelong forward had access to the ball?

Basic decision not being paid and that ump should be demoted for the fact it was basic it was boggling.

Depending on identity of occupier of said position, and who are the whistleblowers, front position is seriously a disadvantage a lot of the time, seems like you can be manhandled, tunneled, pushed aside or under the ball, without penalty, just ask Goldy, Browny, Petrie etc etc
 
Depending on identity of occupier of said position, and who are the whistleblowers, front position is seriously a disadvantage a lot of the time, seems like you can be manhandled, tunneled, pushed aside or under the ball, without penalty, just ask Goldy, Browny, Petrie etc etc

...upgraded avatar....noice.
 
Which of you fine gentleman spat on the little daughter of the one of the Geelong board mega flogs????


He said he pulverised the culprit, so I know it automatically wasn't toes.

Whoever it was, I'm sure you were aiming at him and not his daughter but geez, that's pretty poor form, apparently.

just checked and I haven't been pulverised so ain't me.
 
Which of you fine gentleman spat on the little daughter of the one of the Geelong board mega flogs????


He said he pulverised the culprit, so I know it automatically wasn't toes.

Whoever it was, I'm sure you were aiming at him and not his daughter but geez, that's pretty poor form, apparently.

IUB
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

^ well someone doesn't know wtf they are doing on here...quotes me and offers nothing...^

They are a bunch of soft *****. Don't like swearing at the footy. Whenever someone says stop swearing, this is a family section to me at the footy, I always respond with:

"I'm with my ****ing family campaigner".
 
Thought Spud was horrible, Nahas = finished, Goldy obviously injured, Waite off the boil. Conversely: JMac all class, Wells, Harvey JZ did what they could, LMac continued break-out year. I'm somewhat concerned - granted, we've been sick(?) and now injured against the best two sides we've played, but getting smashed inside as we have in those games bodes ill. However: we can improve. And we rarely lose two in a row. Garner/Wagner for Nahas, re-structure a bit and bring in Daw or Dumont for Mullet. We're a very good shot to roll the Hawks, as I think any of us with any historical sense will attest. And finally Geelong can get f***ed, would love to see them lose an elim at home again.
 
Out of interest, on reflection (not something a lot of people round here get into much), would we be feeling any better if we had, say (just spitballing here) lost to GWS by 7 goals last night instead? How would you say our premiership credentials would be viewed in the media? Thought so.
 
I wasn't as disappointed in Mullett as most others seem to be, barring the kick to Gibbo, that Gibbo didn't move forward for, I was thinking Mullett was getting a bit of dash back, oh well I will have to watch the replay and work out what he did so bad.
 
Out of interest, on reflection (not something a lot of people round here get into much), would we be feeling any better if we had, say (just spitballing here) lost to GWS by 7 goals last night instead? How would you say our premiership credentials would be viewed in the media? Thought so.

fair point but we can have both Sydney teams not being flag favorites.
 
Which of you fine gentleman spat on the little daughter of the one of the Geelong board mega flogs????


He said he pulverised the culprit, so I know it automatically wasn't toes.

Whoever it was, I'm sure you were aiming at him and not his daughter but geez, that's pretty poor form, apparently.

Just as well their fans were gracious in victory..
 
Who do you play BS ?? .......look the the opponents before making the call. Mckenzie's numbers in the VFL late last season were worthy of a promotion but we were hot and no injuries. He is getting game time based on his work rate last year , his "ranking" on our list within the club and the fact he is at end of contract end of season. Whether we re-invest or not. We couldn't go a debutant not against more credible opponents, its not Scott's style.
And he'll be playing next week. The point remains though until he gets more of the ball he's not up to AFL standard.
If you compare BMac coming in to the side and Wood coming in, Wood looked a bit off the pace initially this year but he's improved rapidly, BMac has remained stagnant.
I wish he was going gangbusters but the unfortunate truth is he's just not doing enough to warrant his spot.
 
And he'll be playing next week. The point remains though until he gets more of the ball he's not up to AFL standard.
If you compare BMac coming in to the side and Wood coming in, Wood looked a bit off the pace initially this year but he's improved rapidly, BMac has remained stagnant.
I wish he was going gangbusters but the unfortunate truth is he's just not doing enough to warrant his spot.
Say you were coach.....and this is an honest question without leading anywhere ....would you have tried Lmac , BMac Atley to give them the opportunity to see if they could mix it in there with Ziebell and Wells in support?? I was amazed Scott decided to continue with Dal and Cunners
 
Say you were coach.....and this is an honest question without leading anywhere ....would you have tried Lmac , BMac Atley to give them the opportunity to see if they could mix it in there with Ziebell and Wells in support?? I was amazed Scott decided to continue with Dal and Cunners
Maybe, maybe not. It's all very simple from where we sit and look back with 20/20 hindsight.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy North v Cats

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top