Not really
If either team is not good enough to win it on the day, they should come back next weekend to have another shot.
Why not have a best of 3 finals series then? That should decide definitively who is the best team.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not really
If either team is not good enough to win it on the day, they should come back next weekend to have another shot.
Not really
If either team is not good enough to win it on the day, they should come back next weekend to have another shot.
disagree.
extra time is the way to go. sort it out there and then.
if we come back the following week it may give one team an advantage. someone may now be eligible the following week coming back from injury or suspension. it also may disadvantage a side (eg. if 89 was a draw would derime and dipper been able to get up for the following week ? )
If the GF Replay ends a in draw, declare both clubs as Co-Premiers. The spring carnival is already on the following week, footy's over!!!
There will only ever be one more drawn Grand Final. After the logistical nightmare that will create, extra time will be applied to the Grand Final the same as for other finals.
A GF replay would be a tremendous money spinner all round. I doubt the AFL, media outlets, hotels, airlines etc would consider it a "logistical nightmare", they'd be too busy counting the cash.
I agree, but I'm dying for the next and last drawn GF. Hopefully this year between Geelong and St Kilda.There will only ever be one more drawn Grand Final. After the logistical nightmare that will create, extra time will be applied to the Grand Final the same as for other finals.
best thing would be to ask the old timers on here, what the week was like in Melbourne in 1977 after the drawn GF, in the lead up to the replay... was the hype for the game as big as it was the week before, or the did the sting come out of it a bit with s "let's get on with it and declare a premier already" mentality?
except for that little thing called the NRL Grand Final.
Given the lesser crowds - and that the details of the 1977 replay are rarely discussed and seem to have slipped into obscurity would suggest significantly less interest in the replays. Another factor might be that people might have planned things such as weddings or holidays for the week after the Grand Final in those years, thinking that the football season would be over.
I agree, but I think two 5-minute halves of extra time cheapens the Grand Final.Get it over on the 1 day with extra time i think!
I thought it was up to ANZ Stadium which contest to pick up if there was a clash between an NRL final and an AFL (Swans) final. They go with the contest that they think will be most profitable. If they had a choice between 1 or 2 NRL Preliminary Finals and an AFL Grand Final, which one do you think they would choose?
I'm not sure what would happen in such an extraordinary situation - possibly the AFL do have some official rule for this?
I know that the AFL was very nervous late in the tense 2005 Grand Final between Sydney & West Coast, because if that game had ended in a draw there was no ground availabe to replay the game at any stage the following weekend - the MCG, Docklands, SCG, Stadium Australia, Subiaco Oval and even Football Park & the GABBA were all occupied that weekend.
if we come back the following week it may give one team an advantage. someone may now be eligible the following week coming back from injury or suspension. it also may disadvantage a side (eg. if 89 was a draw would derime and dipper been able to get up for the following week ? )
Extra time, 5 minutes each way. If scores are still level, golden goal (not point). What's so hard about that? The presence of interstate clubs and fans who travel to the game, sometimes from the other side of the country, mean that anything less than a premiership being decided on the day would be a HUGE let-down.
I don't think it would be that big a money spinner. A lot of the GF money is made with package deals, corporate stuff etc which is all sold months in advance. Selling all that again in the space of a week just wouldn't happen. Not to mention that most of the buyers of those packages are "theatre goer" types who would probably feel they've had their money's worth with the excitement of a close game and wouldn't go a second time.
You'd be mainly selling to those who couldn't get a seat the first time, and while that would be great for fans of the teams involved, I don't think they'd fill the ground the second time around. Particularly if the teams involved are from outside Victoria - the will may be there, but it's just not that easy to make a trip to Melbourne on a couple of days notice.
For the AFL, the logisitcs of putting it all together would outweigh the financial gain.
On top of that, the AFL would have to spend the week answering questions from the media about "why don't you play extra time", and as they do every time they're asked a tricky question they'd just change the rules so it looks like they know what they're doing.
I agree, but I think two 5-minute halves of extra time cheapens the Grand Final.
Have a longer break and then two 10-minute halves.
I think they probably have to commit to one or the other a little earlier than a week before the event.
I doubt they could go to the NRL on Monday morning and say "Sorry, your game's off next weekend, we're having the AFL replay instead".
Using that logic, we would outrule all draws.
Fans criss-cross the country each and every week. Does their effort entitle them to a result?
HE HAS A POINT!!!!!
In soccer a draw is common in regular games but there is ALWAYS a result in finals!