Give Watson the heave ho
Tait in.
Tait in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Tait in.
Flintoff 33 with the Bat 27 with the ball
Watson 30 with each.
Nothing in it.
Flintoff just > Watson.
If Watson is fit, he is assured a place in the 11 while Ponting is captain. He won't get dropped, even if his figures are ordinary
Read my post again..If you're saying Flintoff wouldn't get a game for Australia ahead of Watson your kidding yourself.
Flintoff's batting is superior he can hit out as well as defend unlike Watson who seems to be a one paced accumulator of runs.
His bowling is superior as he consistently bowls at 140kph as well as possesing the ability to swing the ball.
Overall Flintoff wins matches, Watson has shown fleeting glimpses.
That said Watson has time on his side and I hope he does well. The least he could do is not become a massive disappointment like Ian Harvey.
If Watson is fit, he is assured a place in the 11 while Ponting is captain. He won't get dropped, even if his figures are ordinary
They are par to Flintoffs...
As for Tait, it would be an awful decision to recall him. His bowling has been atrocious up here, he wasn't able to trouble Maher (who's been in awful form) and Broad (playing his 5th or 6th FC game). With a chance to be in the squad, one would think he would be bowling his arse off to get in (ala Stuart Clark and his 8/58).
Watson is a better batsmen by far but tait would have been better at the death.Would do a better job as lower order hitter and potent bowler, that's for sure.
Watson is a better batsmen by far but tait would have been better at the death.
I think you'll find Clark has a bit more of a hand from the surface.
Clark playing in a game: 270, 152, 6/246
Tait playing in a game: 377, 8/408
13.6 Watson to Loye, FOUR, two in two balls! A touch more orthodox this time, but the same result. Watson just losing his length at the end of that over, and he lacks the pace to get away with it on this slight pudding of a pitch
Admittedly he misses a few as well
13.5 Watson to Loye, FOUR, short and spanked! That fizzed over midwicket! When he hits it, it does stay hit ...
13.4 Watson to Loye, no run, outside off again, but a tighter line and again no shot
13.4 Watson to Loye, 1 wide, way outside off stump and swinging further away
13.3 Watson to Loye, no run, full bunger, and Loye misses out as he slaps this one to cover
13.2 Watson to Loye, no run, attacking intent from Loye, who stands tall to smear that into the covers, but it's not timed
13.1 Watson to Loye, no run, good first delivery. Decent pace, hint of outswing, left alone by Loye
Cricinfo :
Good work ignoring all of my sensible points.
Your right, we should judge a player off one over, could write off just about every international player.
At any rate, as I said, his bowling isn't 100% because he hasn't had match practice..
haha, we've all seen Johnson bowl in domestic cricket.Of course Clark got a bit more of a hand from the surface, but the wicket here is no road. Gillespie looked far better than Tait, bowled really well and worked hard without luck, he got the ball to move at least a little bit, Tait had nothing and looked like very tame and was played accordingly.
And NSW has made 270 & 279 on the WACA wicket showing batting is possible....
oh please, he's the biggest dud going around. (even moreso than emo johnson)Good work ignoring all of my sensible points.
Your right, we should judge a player off one over, could write off just about every international player.
At any rate, as I said, his bowling isn't 100% because he hasn't had match practice..
His bowling is poo. His batting would be reasonable up the order, not suited to number 7 though. However there are no middle order or opening spots up for grabs. Give him the Heave Ho