No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXIV

[All Aust]

What ever happened to if you choose to bump then you wear the consequences? These furktards don't even know their own rules.

This turns out to be a lie spun by the AFL that can be successfully contested. Lies won't stop there.

 

[Groupie_]

how do they go from suspended twice to nothing to see here

hitlers germany was less corrupt than the afl

 

[Greggy]

How does Pickett get suspended for a legal bump but Cripps get off for a bump while jumping into a player, even if both were football actions it’s still a hit to the head that’s caused concussion?? Confused more than ever, new precedent.

 

[Tiges1229]

how do they go from suspended twice to nothing to see here

hitlers germany was less corrupt than the afl

Exactly it’s pathetic , so what bit of information changed from
The first appeal to
The second
Was there more evidence of a second shooter on the grassy Knol.

 

[Tiges1229]

How does Pickett get suspended for a legal bump but Cripps get off for a bump while jumping into a player, even if both were football actions it’s still a hit to the head that’s caused concussion?? Confused more than ever, new precedent.

It’s pure corruption

 

[Groupie_]

u cant give 2 weeks twice and then he gets off like nothing happened

afl makes fifa when sepp blatter was there look like a kindergarten

 

[Noidnadroj]

Ironically I believe Cripps playing is not that much of a positive. He has not been playing that well since mid-season. 16 goals in the first 11 games. 4 goals in the 8 games since.

And any chance the Blues had of the Demons or Pies taking them lightly is now gone with Cripps playing.



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[tunksy]

* I hope the Shemons obliterate them

they will after losing last week.

 

[Groupie_]

Yep and Marlion has dark skin

The AFL is racist against Marlion.

100%

white campaigners like dangerfield are allowed to knock people out in a granny and get nothing,

marlion does perfect traditional football bumps that dont injure the opponent and gets done. and they fine him every week yet cripps gets off today after being suspended twice and no fine !

 

[biaseddustyfan]

Bluesarebackbaby.facebookvid

 

[Noidnadroj]

Get on Cripps for the Brownlow. The only thing that makes sense is the AFL knows he’s currently leading the Brownlow and they want to avoid a huge embarrassment on Brownlow night.

Trust me … the AFL is a corrupt organisation and Crippa must be leading right now.

Get on !!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Groupie_]

Get on Cripps for the Brownlow. The only thing that makes sense is the AFL knows he’s currently leading the Brownlow and they want to avoid a huge embarrassment on Brownlow night.

Trust me … the AFL is a corrupt organisation and Crippa must be leading right now.

Get on !!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

inb4 shane bolton brownlow

 

[Tiges1229]

Get on Cripps for the Brownlow. The only thing that makes sense is the AFL knows he’s currently leading the Brownlow and they want to avoid a huge embarrassment on Brownlow night.

Trust me … the AFL is a corrupt organisation and Crippa must be leading right now.

Get on !!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

If he wins the Brownlow it’s even more corrupt he’s been shite for weeks

 

[shaky]

What ever happened to if you choose to bump then you wear the consequences? These furktards don't even know their own rules.

That was their whole argument that he was contesting the ball not bumping.
Thing is he was late to the contest and jumped off the ground and protected himself by bumping.
Under current rules he’s deserved a suspension. Perhaps he didn’t have intentions to bump and hurt, but it still comes under careless or even reckless.
At least there can’t be any complaints about Cotchin getting off when he contested the ball in that Prelim now.

 

[Groupie_]

poor marlion the afl are gonna fine him again now to make up for cripps and his 4 kids wont eat for a week

 

[STRUGGLETOWN EST1885]

Dees to beat em by 10 goals this week then Pies to beat em by a juicy 1 point in the last round. Bloooooze to finish 9th. The Karma bus is back baby.

 

[Groupie_]

we should make a go fund me to pay marlions fines

 

[chriso11]

What a farce… should double contest everything now. Rule book doesn’t matter, tribunal doesn’t matter, nothing makes sense anymore either inside or outside the game. Become a joke of a sport

 

[SplintWhisky]

The fact Cripps got off on a technicality is a joke. This is not a court of law and arguments of procedure and due course should not be part of a tribunal hearing for disciplining players

 

[theyellowsash]

What ever happened to if you choose to bump then you wear the consequences? These furktards don't even know their own rules.

only applies to players they want to suspend like pickett apparently

 

[theyellowsash]

What a farce… should double contest everything now. Rule book doesn’t matter, tribunal doesn’t matter, nothing makes sense anymore either inside or outside the game. Become a joke of a sport

just find some obscure legal technicality and you get off, thats what carlton did. judges really are lowlifes

 

[theyellowsash]

So you have got guy mrp looks at it gives him 2

They appeal and have 3 guys look at appeal upheld

They appeal again 3 guys look at and cleared

why is there even 2 appeal processes?

 

[kozi]

Appeals board deliberating

 

[tiggywigs]

why is there even 2 appeal processes?

Because the MRO decision was an administrative decision, not a hearing.
The tribunal decision was the first real hearing.
Any proper system of justice should allow an appeal from the first hearing to make sure there has been no miscarriage of justice.
I think the appeal board got it right by the way.
Even if Cripps did choose to bump, the allegation that he had chosen to bump was apparently never put to him during the first hearing.
Despite the alleged decision to bump being cited by the tribunal as the reason for the penalty being upheld.
That is a clear denial of natural justice.
The accused should always have the opportunity to answer the facts alleged.

 

[theyellowsash]

Because the MRO decision was an administrative decision, not a hearing.
The tribunal decision was the first real hearing.
Any proper system of justice should allow an appeal from the first hearing to make sure there has been no miscarriage of justice.
I think the appeal board got it right by the way.
Even if Cripps did choose to bump, the allegation that he had chosen to bump was apparently never put to him during the first hearing.
Despite the alleged decision to bump being cited by the tribunal as the reason for the penalty being upheld.
That is a clear denial of natural justice.
The accused should always have the opportunity to answer the facts alleged.

except they did have the opportunity to answer, because they spent the tribunal hearing arguing that it wasnt a bump.

this is a technical decision for technicalities sake. classic lawyer rubbish.