- Sep 29, 2016
- 4,164
- 10,992
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Far Kew I believe
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVII
- Thread starter tigers12
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Nov 25, 2015
- 19,055
- 65,140
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond VFL Richmond VFLW AFLW
Grigg going to the suns heck it
rfctigerarmy
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
I don't know how we would have gone, but I suspect Adelaide, Geelong and Western Bulldogs would have shown more than the Saints.
domin8
Club Legend
Saints although average had a less than ideal preparation surrounding the goings on with Membrey. Shocking just hope he gets the help he needs
rfctigerarmy
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
Very true, it would have been difficult for the Saints to play. A final isn't as important as the Membrey situation anyway.
Whats wrong with Membrey?
What happened there? I have read one article but just said mental health challenges etc. What actually happened ?
domin8
Club Legend
Just that everyone has their demons and fighting their own battles.
Freddy Swift
Club Legend
Best gif ever
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Sure was. Then he became unalived along with our dreams of the bar
- Jan 3, 2012
- 47,474
- 97,493
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC, Victory, All Blecks,
Don’t forget the 8 track cartridge
Noidnadroj
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 8, 2020
- 7,187
- 27,337
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Wasn't there some noise level thing done at that game? Funny how they haven't done one with Carlton... Or maybe they did and they never got close to us
The cheer when Cotchin kicked into F50, then Dusty roved and handballed to Lambert for opening goal will never be beaten for noise. Ever.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Noidnadroj
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 8, 2020
- 7,187
- 27,337
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Cornes was seat 1A saying Mansell was a pretty straight forward 3-week suspension despite having 0.1 of a second to react when going FOR THE BALL. The guy doesn’t even hide his Tiger bias any more. Needs to be called out. You can’t support 3-weeks for Mansell and innocence for Maynard 12-weeks later.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Hoos
Hooplehead
- Mar 9, 2007
- 33,868
- 78,746
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Burnie United FC, Cheddar AFC
When did they fix something?
- Oct 3, 2013
- 1,565
- 3,688
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics
Who is that man?
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
Cornes is a dick, comparing a smothering contest to a marking contest.
However, I'll start off by saying this:
Michael Christian sent Lynch straight to the tribunal, yet he wanted to throw Maynards out? Laughable The guy should be sacked for being so blatantly biased.
Collingwood can however use parts of our defence for their argument. Maynards actions shouldn't be considered rough conduct in that he braced for contact instead of choosing to bump. He needs to argue that he rotated his body because if he didn't it would have opened himself up in a vulnerable decision.
That's how the pies need to contest it, the same way we did for Lynch however this is where the similarities end as Lynch had eyes for the ball the whole time before bracing for impact, in Maynards case he didn't have eyes for the ball and as soon as choose to jump off the ground he lost vision with the ball.
Comparing the 2 as like for like is just hog wash and media hysteria, using bits of both instances because of similar outcomes doesn't mean those actions were the same.
Nostradumbass
BigFooty Legend
- Oct 2, 2007
- 49,638
- 122,703
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Everton FC Williamstown FC
I bet he misspelt his surname as well
Masotiger
All Australian
Absolutely 100% on the money CR.Cornes is a dick, comparing a smothering contest to a marking contest.
However, I'll start off by saying this:
Michael Christian sent Lynch straight to the tribunal, yet he wanted to throw Maynards out? Laughable The guy should be sacked for being so blatantly biased.
Collingwood can however use parts of our defence for their argument. Maynards actions shouldn't be considered rough conduct in that he braced for contact instead of choosing to bump. He needs to argue that he rotated his body because if he didn't it would have opened himself up in a vulnerable decision.
That's how the pies need to contest it, the same way we did for Lynch however this is where the similarities end as Lynch had eyes for the ball the whole time before bracing for impact, in Maynards case he didn't have eyes for the ball and as soon as choose to jump off the ground he lost vision with the ball.
Comparing the 2 as like for like is just hog wash and media hysteria, using bits of both instances because of similar outcomes doesn't mean those actions were the same.
"Attempted smother" is at least on the same level as "attempted tackle" when I bloke gets concussed.
Maynard's was a charge, simple as that.
- May 20, 2019
- 2,857
- 8,904
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
