No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
147cbb5b-87af-47df-b5a0-508712f34267-jpeg.1799749


open-arms-emoji-victorious-1216999502.gif
 
that carltoon final only had like 10k blooze fans

norf one was just their cheer squad that were norf fans
Lol cheer squad is all that have, plus the speakers
 

Log in to remove this ad.

They were. That performance was my greatest fear for us if we made it. They looked like posers. GWS looked like a team of seasoned Vets compared to them
I don't know how we would have gone, but I suspect Adelaide, Geelong and Western Bulldogs would have shown more than the Saints.
 
Saints although average had a less than ideal preparation surrounding the goings on with Membrey. Shocking just hope he gets the help he needs
Very true, it would have been difficult for the Saints to play. A final isn't as important as the Membrey situation anyway.
 
Very true, it would have been difficult for the Saints to play. A final isn't as important as the Membrey situation anyway.


What happened there? I have read one article but just said mental health challenges etc. What actually happened ?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wasn't there some noise level thing done at that game? Funny how they haven't done one with Carlton... Or maybe they did and they never got close to us 🤣

The cheer when Cotchin kicked into F50, then Dusty roved and handballed to Lambert for opening goal will never be beaten for noise. Ever.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
He is comparing to the Lynch bump and saying Lynch got off so Maynard should get off, but this tool was the one screaming that Lynch should get min of 4 week and yet he wants Maynard to go free. How can anyone with the slightest bit of common sense take this guy seriously.

Cornes was seat 1A saying Mansell was a pretty straight forward 3-week suspension despite having 0.1 of a second to react when going FOR THE BALL. The guy doesn’t even hide his Tiger bias any more. Needs to be called out. You can’t support 3-weeks for Mansell and innocence for Maynard 12-weeks later.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
He is comparing to the Lynch bump and saying Lynch got off so Maynard should get off, but this tool was the one screaming that Lynch should get min of 4 week and yet he wants Maynard to go free. How can anyone with the slightest bit of common sense take this guy seriously.
Cornes is a dick, comparing a smothering contest to a marking contest.


However, I'll start off by saying this:

Michael Christian sent Lynch straight to the tribunal, yet he wanted to throw Maynards out? Laughable The guy should be sacked for being so blatantly biased.

Collingwood can however use parts of our defence for their argument. Maynards actions shouldn't be considered rough conduct in that he braced for contact instead of choosing to bump. He needs to argue that he rotated his body because if he didn't it would have opened himself up in a vulnerable decision.

That's how the pies need to contest it, the same way we did for Lynch however this is where the similarities end as Lynch had eyes for the ball the whole time before bracing for impact, in Maynards case he didn't have eyes for the ball and as soon as choose to jump off the ground he lost vision with the ball.

Comparing the 2 as like for like is just hog wash and media hysteria, using bits of both instances because of similar outcomes doesn't mean those actions were the same.
 
Cornes is a dick, comparing a smothering contest to a marking contest.


However, I'll start off by saying this:

Michael Christian sent Lynch straight to the tribunal, yet he wanted to throw Maynards out? Laughable The guy should be sacked for being so blatantly biased.

Collingwood can however use parts of our defence for their argument. Maynards actions shouldn't be considered rough conduct in that he braced for contact instead of choosing to bump. He needs to argue that he rotated his body because if he didn't it would have opened himself up in a vulnerable decision.

That's how the pies need to contest it, the same way we did for Lynch however this is where the similarities end as Lynch had eyes for the ball the whole time before bracing for impact, in Maynards case he didn't have eyes for the ball and as soon as choose to jump off the ground he lost vision with the ball.

Comparing the 2 as like for like is just hog wash and media hysteria, using bits of both instances because of similar outcomes doesn't mean those actions were the same.
Absolutely 100% on the money CR.
 
Cornes was seat 1A saying Mansell was a pretty straight forward 3-week suspension despite having 0.1 of a second to react when going FOR THE BALL. The guy doesn’t even hide his Tiger bias any more. Needs to be called out. You can’t support 3-weeks for Mansell and innocence for Maynard 12-weeks later.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
"Attempted smother" is at least on the same level as "attempted tackle" when I bloke gets concussed.

Maynard's was a charge, simple as that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top