If only the members still mattered.more and more that matter are seeing it i reckon.
On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If only the members still mattered.more and more that matter are seeing it i reckon.
because clearly David Koch has too much ego and pride in himself. The fact he nominated so early Ken will be a 10 year coach under his reign says it all about his bias and poor judgement. It also shows the shallowness of his business acumen. One thing I have learnt in running a business for 17 years, don’t get personal with employees, don’t make big promises as things change rapidly.
Any chance we hear a ‘BigFooty, You were wrong’?Koch is desperate to say “I told you so” and terrified of admitting he was wrong.
Isn't it the other way round? AFL assisted clubs only have a liability for 6 months salary, if they sack their coach a year or two early, whereas as the unassisted club have to make a 100% payout.If it’s only applied to AFL assisted clubs, it gives the power clubs an advantage when looking for a coach.
Isn't it the other way round? AFL assisted clubs only have a liability for 6 months salary, if they sack their coach a year or two early, whereas as the unassisted club have to make a 100% payout.
Isn't it the other way round? AFL assisted clubs only have a liability for 6 months salary, if they sack their coach a year or two early, whereas as the unassisted club have to make a 100% payout.
Sure, but if you are signing a new contract, and are an ex AFL coach it's probably for 4 years, and you are likely to be guaranteed 3 years in the job. If he balks because of the prospect of not lasting much more than a year, then do you want him as your coach? That's not a very confident person.If you're offered two otherwise identical contracts, would you prefer the one with a max 6-month payout or the one with a 100% payout?
Sure, but if you are signing a new contract, and are an ex AFL coach it's probably for 4 years, and you are likely to be guaranteed 3 years in the job. If he balks because of the prospect of not lasting much more than a year, then do you want him as your coach? That's not a very confident person.
If you are a young coach it will probably be a factor, but then again, those rules probably have a sunset clause for when the pandemic ends.
Sure but a coach sought by Vic clubs and lives in Victoria is likely to pick a Vic club because if the money is similar, why make such a big disruptive change if you have a wife and kids to consider? There would have to be a massive disparity between Port's and the Vic club's list to choose PortIt would come down to the individual and their circumstances but if this 6 month settlement condition was in when KT first approached Hinkley, given Hinkley had been unsuccessful three times before to the point of not wanting to be panelled then I reckon his desparation makes him grab the chance to be a senior coach. A coach that is sought after by Vic clubs and lives in Vic is likely to bypass us for a worse Vic club.
Schofield has runs on the board - 3 WAFL flags and 2 x runner up. Not bad in 6 years.Contrary to popular belief I actually think vossy would’ve been the first assistant from within that I would’ve backed for next senior coach. Schofield and Montgomery get all the love, not exactly sure why but I would’ve picked Voss ahead of those two.
Will be a good appointment for Collingwood. Surely a better fit than someone like choco or even don pyke.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
The fact he was whingeing about people asking him about not beating top 4 sides after the Sydney and Hawthorn game, suggests his new contract has a lot more than the make finals once in 3 years clause, that he got after Koch raced to his home to re-sign him, the weekend after the WCE elimination final loss in 2017.The board gave Hinkley an extra 2 years because we got very close last year and they took the optimistic approach that the club was close and didn't want the club/Hinkley to have any distraction to take away from that premiership push. Whilst I haven't completely given up in the year just yet, when it becomes completely apparent that we are not making the Grand Final this year Hinkley needs to be moved on.
Just don’t think it a big statement.Yep and outside of Tredrea's insinuations there hasn't been past players declaring it publicly that I've heard. If a couple of players expressed their opposing view publicly I would like to know who. What's your problem with that?
Hinkley is a grown man, being paid as a professional.The board gave Hinkley an extra 2 years because we got very close last year and they took the optimistic approach that the club was close and didn't want the club/Hinkley to have any distraction to take away from that premiership push. Whilst I haven't completely given up in the year just yet, when it becomes completely apparent that we are not making the Grand Final this year Hinkley needs to be moved on.
Yeah but will the AFL let Josh pop on a 19th player when we get in trouble?Dont be surprised if Josh Carr applies when a vacancy pops up.
Just don’t think it a big statement.