- Banned
- #51
first to spend money
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
On 20 February 1986, entrepreneur Silvio Berlusconi acquired the club and saved it from bankruptcy investing vast amounts of money,[2] appointing rising manager Arrigo Sacchi at the helm of the Rossoneri and signing Netherlands internationals Ruud Gullit, Marco van Basten and Frank Rijkaard.[2] The Dutch trio added an attacking impetus to the team, and complemented the club's Italian internationals Paolo Maldini, Franco Baresi, Alessandro Costacurta and Roberto Donadoni. Under Sacchi, Milan won its first Scudetto in nine years in the 1987–88 season. The following year the club won its first European Cup in two decades, beating Romanian club Steaua București 4–0 in the final. Milan retained their title with a 1–0 win over Benfica a year later and remain the last team to win back-to-back European Cups.[19] The Milan team of 1989–90 has been voted the best club side of all time, in a global poll of experts conducted by World Soccer magazinefirst to spend money
Chelsea was the first billionaire owner as far as I know
He's also a lot richer than other owners due to exploiting the downfall of the USSR
Not all owners spend 50m pound if they fancy a striker
On 20modern ary 1986, entrepreneur Silvio Berlusconi acquired the club and saved it from bankruptcy investing vast amounts of money,[2] appointing rising manager Arrigo Sacchi at the helm of the Rossoneri and signing Netherlands internationals Ruud Gullit, Marco van Basten and Frank Rijkaard.[2] The Dutch trio added an attacking impetus to the team, and complemented the club's Italian internationals Paolo Maldini, Franco Baresi, Alessandro Costacurta and Roberto Donadoni. Under Sacchi, Milan won its first Scudetto in nine years in the 1987–88 season. The following year the club won its first European Cup in two decades, beating Romanian club Steaua București 4–0 in the final. Milan retained their title with a 1–0 win over Benfica a year later and remain the last team to win back-to-back European Cups.[19] The Milan team of 1989–90 has been voted the best club side of all time, in a global poll of experts conducted by World Soccer magazine
chef
Its not hard to be self sufficent, when you spend a billion pounds straight up
And playing zero academy players
What's the point when you can just buy what u want eh
Bamford, Kalas and others will surely walk into the side soon enough.
i know but no matte how good they are I doubt they will get a go
Doubtful you'd blood a promising youngster when you can spend 40 million pouns on the next big thing
I assume u joking?
Bamford, Kalas and others will surely walk into the side soon enough.
cthis post: 37977669 said:Like Zouma(19), Oscar (20), Hazard(21), Azpi (22), Courtois (21)
I know these guys didnt come through the academy but if they are good enough we'll play them reguardless of age.
We dont just dpend £40m on the next best thing.
I think this kind of highlights my point ...
Why would they try bamford or kalas
When they can just go and buy the next hazard or zouma
Good idea for a thread mate.
I actually saw that bit about Blackpool running out of kits and having to use a signed top during a match yesterday and was going to make mention of it. Pretty comical, you'd expect maybe something like that from a pub team but a professional club in the second division?
Also was a good eye opener as to how bad things are elsewhere. Not sure if it was just myself but I wasn't really aware how bad things were for the Blackpool fans (I know they had a lot of trouble in preseason trying to get a squad together and that they've since been relegated?). That pitch is awful and having an owner who openly antagonises the fans? Surely the Football League or maybe the FA have to step in and intervene?
I'd be curious to understand Oyston's intentions for the club. Surely by seemingly running it into the ground (relegation without a whimper), he's ultimately losing value on an asset he owns and may (subsequently) need to spend more of his money to keep the club solvent?
With Ashley, he spends a bare minimum to 'ensure' the club stay in the PL and thus get access to the TV riches plus free advertising to a global audience for his true passion, his sporting goods empire. For Oyston, I can't see any point or value in seeing the club go down the toilet. If he doesn't want the club, why not sell it? And if he wants to sell? Why not strengthen his asking price by trying to maintain the club's position in the Championship (and not letting the facilities/stadium deteriorate)?
I'll readily admit that our plight is nowhere near as bad as Blackpool's - and it seems a shame that there probably hasn't been as much coverage/focus of what Oyston is doing to the club.
That being said, if fans become completely dejected/disillusioned with their club to the point where they have literally no enjoyment, passion or optimism anymore, wouldn't that be considered 'terrible' by most standards too?
12 odd years ago, the club was playing in the Champions League and regularly pushing for Europe, fast forward to today and the most exciting thing to happen to the club is the seemingly first organised effort by the fans to try and eject the owner from the club.
There is no more dreams of European glory, or a cup success to end our trophy drought. Heck, we can't even relish our derby anymore or hope to see a Toon side playing entertaining football and having a genuine crack anymore. There are no heroes for the fans to worship and adore - what's the point? They'll be sold off anyway. Everything that was once special with supporting Newcastle (and probably for any other team) has gone under Ashley.
The day Ashley came in was the day that Newcastle United stopped being a football club and became an empty, soulless money machine to promote Sports Direct and profit the owner.
Just to clarify too, most Toon fans will tell you they don't expect the club to be fighting for top 4 honours or the title. Most are realistic enough to know that without super investment, such talk is essentially a pipe dream.
All Newcastle fans fundamentally want is to restore the enjoyment, excitement, pride and passion of supporting their local team that has gone under Ashley's regime. They want to believe the club that represents them and their city is trying to improve and progress instead of treading water so the owner can profit.
As I said in the matchday thread, most fans would probably change their minds on Ashley if he could just prove he genuinely cared about the club (and not just the balance sheet).
And as I've said if they're good enough they'll play.
Another way of saying it could be; if they are kicking ass at genk, lille or Etienne.
Chelsea will buy them. And playing them instead of homegrown talent.
If Boro go up, Bamf will go there for one more season I think. Unsure about Kalas.Bamford, Kalas and others will surely walk into the side soon enough.
No English players in the Chelsea academy anyway
French and Danish
wtf?No English players in the Chelsea academy anyway
Buy em when they young save money...
French and Danish
In other news, you're 2 points from safety in the English youth leagues and could drop to division 2 next year.John Terry says hi
But seriously our academy got overhauled 4 or 5 years ago when Emenalo became our technical director. Since then results wise we are second to none to any other clubs academy(we just won the under 18's UEFA league). Guys like Ake, RLC, Christensen, Solanke etc also got a taste of first team football. I have no doubt that these guys if good enough (got to remember it's easier to get a game at a club like Soton than it is at Chelsea) will get opportunities.