I'm not normally one of the lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key types that drives law and order policy here in the west, but it's hard not to want to join the lynch mob when it comes to stuff like this.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/22046148/rapist-allegedly-breaches-order-days-after-release/
Psychiatrist Mark Hall wrote in a report to the court TJD had "prominent psychopathic traits" and his next offence was likely to occur in a relationship.
Dr Hall estimated "the offending would involve violence, with a chance of escalation to serious life-threatening violence".
Despite that and evidence TJD had sexually abused his own child recently, the judge freed him under an order that included wearing a tracking device.
In 2011, TJD was categorised a dangerous sex offender and ordered held indefinitely. That was rescinded in 2012, but soon after his release on a supervision order, he breached the conditions.
He's now been released again, apparently breached one of the conditions, yet hasn't been immediately taken into custody.
Is there some sort of ingrained professional bias in the shrinks/case officers et al involved in corrections and assigned to these guys that blinds them to the danger they present to others? Or is it a case of sociopaths learning how to "game the system", so to speak.
Between Adrian Bayley, Brett Cowan and this guy, as well as lesser known examples of the same thing like Gary Narkle, it seems incomprehensible that a trained professional could look at their repeated propensity for sexual violence, yet somehow think its appropriate they be released back into the community.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/22046148/rapist-allegedly-breaches-order-days-after-release/
Psychiatrist Mark Hall wrote in a report to the court TJD had "prominent psychopathic traits" and his next offence was likely to occur in a relationship.
Dr Hall estimated "the offending would involve violence, with a chance of escalation to serious life-threatening violence".
Despite that and evidence TJD had sexually abused his own child recently, the judge freed him under an order that included wearing a tracking device.
In 2011, TJD was categorised a dangerous sex offender and ordered held indefinitely. That was rescinded in 2012, but soon after his release on a supervision order, he breached the conditions.
He's now been released again, apparently breached one of the conditions, yet hasn't been immediately taken into custody.
Is there some sort of ingrained professional bias in the shrinks/case officers et al involved in corrections and assigned to these guys that blinds them to the danger they present to others? Or is it a case of sociopaths learning how to "game the system", so to speak.
Between Adrian Bayley, Brett Cowan and this guy, as well as lesser known examples of the same thing like Gary Narkle, it seems incomprehensible that a trained professional could look at their repeated propensity for sexual violence, yet somehow think its appropriate they be released back into the community.