Pauline Hanson - One Nation Party

Remove this Banner Ad

h-1.png
 
Yes, they are.

Payman waived around paperwork yesterday which apparently would have resolved the question but when asked to table it refused to do so…..
She shouldn't have to.

And she shouldnt have any trouble with the taliban, she should have got Bowen to discuss it with them at Cop29 seeing though they are so well thought of these days..
You shouldn't have any trouble with them either if you hate brown women this much.
 
Yes, they are.


She shouldn't have to.


You shouldn't have any trouble with them either if you hate brown women this much.

So were the alp racist for raising the status for Joyce, Xenophon, waters and the rest of the people who went through the original section 44 scenario


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Log in to remove this ad.

[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]][emoji6][emoji6]" data-quote="Johnny Bananas" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
No, because they legitimately hadn't been tested. Payman has. Moreover, I don't see Hanson trying this with any white politicians.

How has she been tested? By the alp lawyers?

Bit hard to do it with anyone else when payman is the one under suspicion… even the side of politics that put her through has questions….


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
How has she been tested? By the alp lawyers?
By the AEC.

Bit hard to do it with anyone else when payman is the one under suspicion… even the side of politics that put her through has questions….
You know there are other politicians born overseas that were first elected in 2022, yeah?
 
How has she been tested? By the alp lawyers?

Bit hard to do it with anyone else when payman is the one under suspicion… even the side of politics that put her through has questions….


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Have been meaning to ask you this for quite a while now but please tell me that you are not impugning Derek Chadwick's name by incorporating his jumper number in your username.
Even worse, immeasurably worse, please don't tell me that you are him or even related to the great man.
Not prepared for that final letdown, that final crushing disappointment.
Are you his ex-teammate, that resolute frother to the West Australian opinion pages, John Bandy?
 
Lol the comments on the bottom of that link

It's amazing how any people don't really understand what "freedom of speech" is - it's never been, nor should it be, the ability to abuse someone else without consequences

Isn't the crux really only the ability to have a political opinion without persecution?
That's called hate speech what Hanson is trying to defend. When has that ever been acceptable? Time we as a nation called it for what it is and not somebody calling out " wokeness" which is complete joke
 
call me cynical but her senate theatrics the other day looks like a campaign stunt in anticipation of an election early next year (happy to be corrected but think her senate spot is up this time round)

add this attention seeking nonsense to her failed lawsuit and you get a feel for the overarching campaign issue she and her contemptible party will focus on

[edit] should note - it wasnt her lawsuit ........ 'defamation lawsuit loss' probably a better descriptor
 
Last edited:
call me cynical but her senate theatrics the other day looks like a campaign stunt in anticipation of an election early next year (happy to be corrected but think her senate spot is up this time round)

add this attention seeking nonsense to her failed lawsuit and you get a feel for the overarching campaign issue she and her contemptible party will focus on
Yep she’s mobilising, we can know she didn’t come up with the idea, her only qualifications are deep frying dim sims.
 
call me cynical but her senate theatrics the other day looks like a campaign stunt in anticipation of an election early next year (happy to be corrected but think her senate spot is up this time round)

add this attention seeking nonsense to her failed lawsuit and you get a feel for the overarching campaign issue she and her contemptible party will focus on
Yea it's always been that way. Get elected, get AEC money for each first preference, rinse and repeat
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

call me cynical but her senate theatrics the other day looks like a campaign stunt in anticipation of an election early next year (happy to be corrected but think her senate spot is up this time round)
She got re-elected in 2022 so she isn't up for election. Malcolm Roberts is. But I do agree this is a publicity stunt to keep her party relevant. If they don't keep carving out their own space, they'll lose the angry regional vote to the Katters and the angry urban vote to the Libertarians.
 
She got re-elected in 2022 so she isn't up for election. Malcolm Roberts is. But I do agree this is a publicity stunt to keep her party relevant. If they don't keep carving out their own space, they'll lose the angry regional vote to the Katters and the angry urban vote to the Libertarians.
Still $$$$ to be received from the AEC for every 1st preference vote though.
 
Interesting. I know Gina held a fundraiser for ON previously (looked it up and it was exactly one year ago, to the day!) but I thought she'd held fundraisers for Dutton since then. I figured the LNP was who she was planning to back financially at the next election. But maybe she'll back both the LNP and ON.

Anyone she can feed scraps to and have them roll over, bark on command, and sit at her doormat whimpering for a pat.

Edit: I'm sure Albanese would do her bidding too, if it was required.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Pauline Hanson - One Nation Party

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top