- Apr 26, 2011
- 10,898
- 13,321
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Wimbledon AFC
All hail Barnett, screw public housing, get a job and buy a house.
We are getting a real stadium , yehooooeeeeee
We are getting a real stadium , yehooooeeeeee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
isnt the East west tunnel part of the Westlink? from the easten freeway through to the western ring road?
alot of the funding for the east west, has been from private inverters. so thats why its being built first
when the current citylink tunnels where first built there was alot of people posting saying it wasn't needed as well. the railways are state owned, no private funding could be used.
the metro sysetm is needed,and will be built will be the next project after the East west link & that new train line being buit from deer park to werribee
the majorty of people that whinge about out rail system are the left winged idiotse that have been to the larger more populated cities, eg London, New yorks, tokyos,& get all excited because they have trains running every 3 minutes 24 hrs a day. it will not work here due to Melbourne having only a very small population to those cities, Melbourne spans over a longer land mass than most other cities in the world.
the state government would make peanuts from federation square to what it spent on it to build it! and not many people even know what is there
as i originally said, a tax funds along with private investments would be the the best scenario. for s company to spend so much money on a project the government usually throws some incentives in it
prehaps, its a project that needs to happen the East West tunnel, & its not a smell project buy any means alot of the money for it will be coming from private investments, as many major hwys are privatly owned across australisMy fear is east west will also suck funding away from any other road projects. The road v rail is what they want you to think. Its wedge politics
Knowledgable road planners have serous misgivings about the value
What they should just do is bulldoze Subi and bulldoze the WACA (I'll cry but it needs to be done) and use those proceeds to help pay for the stadium.
Compensate the WAFC (which is state government anyway) and the WACA by letting them run the stadium for half the year each.
Both the WACA and Subi are sitting on goldmines.
This.
Can someone explain to me why they are not building a multi purpose cricket AFL stadium? Every other capital city has the AFL/cricket equivalent (i.e. Adelaide Oval, MCG, SCG, GABBA). I am not a perth resident, but it seems (looking at a map), that the WACA has a great location adjacent to the city. Could they not have rebuilt/redeveloped that stadium to move AFL into the city (a la Adelaide Oval)? Would have been a helluva lot cheaper IMO.
This.
Can someone explain to me why they are not building a multi purpose cricket AFL stadium? Every other capital city has the AFL/cricket equivalent (i.e. Adelaide Oval, MCG, SCG, GABBA). I am not a perth resident, but it seems (looking at a map), that the WACA has a great location adjacent to the city. Could they not have rebuilt/redeveloped that stadium to move AFL into the city (a la Adelaide Oval)? Would have been a helluva lot cheaper IMO.
Don't see why they would need to use the new stadium, not unless they draw one of the big European clubs for a scratchie. They can't even fill their current home.Correct? I can't see much Glory love occurring at the new ground.
So it'll probably read like:
AFL: Fremantle, West Coast
T20: Australia, Scorchers, Warriors finals
ODI: Australia
Tests: Ashes
WACA:
T20: Warriors
ODI: Warriors
Tests: Warriors, probably 3/4 Aust. tests
Correct? I can't see much Glory love occurring at the new ground.
Is it true though that the ICC requires a pitch to be in place all season for a Test Match?So it'll probably read like:
AFL: Fremantle, West Coast
T20: Australia, Scorchers, Warriors finals
ODI: Australia
Tests: Ashes
WACA:
T20: Warriors
ODI: Warriors
Tests: Warriors, probably 3/4 Aust. tests
Correct? I can't see much Glory love occurring at the new ground.
Don't see why they would need to use the new stadium, not unless they draw one of the big European clubs for a scratchie. They can't even fill their current home.
Is it true though that the ICC requires a pitch to be in place all season for a Test Match?
Eg., MCG-style, drop it in at start of summer, take it out at the end, otherwise it's not going to meet ICC Test Match standards? Pretty sure this (and crowds) are why NZ still plays Tests at Basin Reserve but limited-overs internationals at Westpac Stadium.
Plus soccer and union internationals.
Western Warriors don't play T20.
So it'll probably read like:
AFL: Fremantle, West Coast
T20: Australia, Scorchers, Warriors finals
ODI: Australia
Tests: Ashes
WACA:
T20: Warriors
ODI: Warriors
Tests: Warriors, probably 3/4 Aust. tests
Correct? I can't see much Glory love occurring at the new ground.
Bet it ends up running a year or 2 late.