Port Adelaide's plan to use jumpers similar to Collingwood

Remove this Banner Ad

Why don't they wear something like this:

iu-406-jpeg.1123558


Keeps their SANFL tradition while still being the AFL Port.

And no one can say "but that isn't Port" when teal is one of AFL Port's primary colours.
 
Why don't they wear something like this:

iu-406-jpeg.1123558


Keeps their SANFL tradition while still being the AFL Port.

And no one can say "but that isn't Port" when teal is one of AFL Port's primary colours.
Why don't Essendon wear a red top when they're playing on ANZAC Day as the away team to remove the clash with Collingwood's mostly black outfit?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Huge difference here.

Fitzroy and South Melbourne were foundation clubs of the competition, playing in the VFL's first season in 1897.
Port Adelaide joined the AFL competition 100 years later in 1997 wearing teal, black and white and an official club logo/name of "Port Power". Anything they wore before this has no direct relevance to the history of the VFL/AFL competition itself. Sure it has relevance to the club, which is why Collingwood and AFL graciously approved it to be worn last year for your 150th anniversary game.
Do the afl represent Australian rules football in this country, are they the custodians of its history and heritage? If so then every team for which plays in the afl has a right to represent its entire history not what other clubs see fit to tell them they can.
 
Why don't they wear something like this:

iu-406-jpeg.1123558


Keeps their SANFL tradition while still being the AFL Port.

And no one can say "but that isn't Port" when teal is one of AFL Port's primary colours.
Because that is not a celebration of our heritage, I don't mind the jumper but it completely misses the point of what the whole issue is about.
 
Because that is not a celebration of our heritage, I don't mind the jumper but it completely misses the point of what the whole issue is about.
It’s too far gone now, but imagine if this was the original Power guernsey back in 1997.

Appreciate you want the original black and white bars, but even now this is a good fusion of SANFL history and AFL present.
 
Why don't Essendon wear a red top when they're playing on ANZAC Day as the away team to remove the clash with Collingwood's mostly black outfit?

Cos Eddie wants Essendon, Carlton and Richmond to play Collingwood in their home singlet. If that's what he wanted, Collingwood should've continued to wear their predominantly white uniform at home to these clubs.

Convention (not an official rule) in the NFL is teams generally wear coloured jerseys at home, and white jerseys away. Did you know that the Dallas Cowboys President Tex Schramm in the 1960s adopted white jerseys at home so the Dallas Cowboys fans could see visiting teams in their primary coloured jerseys? What a thoughtful President. Eddie should've done same.
 
The official Club name when Port Adelaide joined the AFL was the Port Adelaide Football Club. Just like it had been for the previous 120+ years.
1620631615704.png
According to the Port Adelaide Football Club website the above was the official club logo in 1997, their first year in the AFL competition.


Not sure why Port fans are offended when this indisputable fact is pointed out?
 
It’s too far gone now, but imagine if this was the original Power guernsey back in 1997.

Appreciate you want the original black and white bars, but even now this is a good fusion of SANFL history and AFL present.
Having that as our standard guernsey - I could live with that.

Having the B & W PB's for 1-2 Showdowns a year would still be the request however.
 
Why don't they wear something like this:

iu-406-jpeg.1123558


Keeps their SANFL tradition while still being the AFL Port.

And no one can say "but that isn't Port" when teal is one of AFL Port's primary colours.

Lol. Where did you get that from? That’s my handiwork.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Huge difference here.

Fitzroy and South Melbourne were foundation clubs of the competition, playing in the VFL's first season in 1897.
Port Adelaide joined the AFL competition 100 years later in 1997 wearing teal, black and white and an official club logo/name of "Port Power". Anything they wore before this has no direct relevance to the history of the VFL/AFL competition itself. Sure it has relevance to the club, which is why Collingwood and the AFL graciously approved it to be worn last year for your 150th anniversary game.

Here is the 1997 Port logo:

1620632393878.png

It has the prison bars on it.
 
Why don't Essendon wear a red top when they're playing on ANZAC Day as the away team to remove the clash with Collingwood's mostly black outfit?
That's up to the AFL to decide. We wear our clash jumper against Richmond as the away team. I don't mind doing the same against Collingwood.
Lol. Where did you get that from? That’s my handiwork.
It was floating around the site. Looks good.
Because that is not a celebration of our heritage, I don't mind the jumper but it completely misses the point of what the whole issue is about.
SANFL history. AFL Port wear Black, white and teal and always has. Black and white prison bars is just never going to happen. Maybe the bars can be teal and white.
No. If we are gunna bring back the bars it’s gotta be the true jumper otherwise keep the current one
Ok then keep the current one.
I think if the two middle Teal bars were white then you have something pretty good.
Yeah that would be awesome.
 
View attachment 1123675
According to the Port Adelaide Football Club website the above was the official club logo in 1997, their first year in the AFL competition.


Not sure why Port fans are offended when this indisputable fact is pointed out?

The initial nickname was "Port Power". When nuffies like you started thinking the club was Port Power FC est 1996 as a result, it shortened the nickname to "Power" and insisted on the correct name "Port Adelaide" being used in the media.
 
View attachment 1123675
According to the Port Adelaide Football Club website the above was the official club logo in 1997, their first year in the AFL competition.


Not sure why Port fans are offended when this indisputable fact is pointed out?

Are we seriously confusing an abbreviation on a logo with the official club name?

I guess The Port Adelaide Football Club, known as The Power didn't quite fit.
 
View attachment 1123675
According to the Port Adelaide Football Club website the above was the official club logo in 1997, their first year in the AFL competition.


Not sure why Port fans are offended when this indisputable fact is pointed out?
Because that's a TEAM logo, not a CLUB logo.
Are we seriously confusing an abbreviation on a logo with the official club name?

I guess The Port Adelaide Football Club, known as The Power didn't quite fit.
A lot of people truly don't even know the difference between a club and a team.
 
When nuffies like you started thinking the club was Port Power FC est 1996 as a result, it shortened the nickname to "Power"

True or false: Port Adelaide approved official AFL merchandise to be produced and sold indicating the club was established in 1996?

1620633670685.png
1620633756521.png
1620633962342.png
 
True or false: Port Adelaide approved official AFL merchandise to be produced and sold indicating the club was established in 1996?

View attachment 1123711
View attachment 1123714
View attachment 1123722

These were made by the AFL's merchandise partners at the time. The club immediately brought this error to the AFL's attention and that is why virtually all merchandise issued since these initial pieces have 1870 and Port Adelaide on them. These are actually collectors items because there were very few of these produced after 1997. In fact these are probably some of the last produced judging by the logo, maybe around 2000. It was an ongoing problem for the first few years.
 
Got to love those so called agreements we supposed have signed in good faith and then when we produce actual documents with signatures... we get crickets. It just demonstrates that nothing written on paper and signed has weight or meaning when it features Collingwood presidents signature. Might as well be sh!t tickets.


Collingwood President Allan McAlister’s letter to then Port Adelaide President Greg Boulton dated 1 September 1995.

“We at Collingwood are most grateful for Port Adelaide accepting it should enter the AFL with a change from its black-and-white colours and Magpie name which we hold dear to our hearts at Collingwood.

I will reiterate to our board that if the Port Adelaide Football Club should succeed at ranking higher than the Collingwood Football Club for three consecutive years in the AFL then our objections will be waived.”


Port Adelaide ranked higher than Collingwood on its first five consecutive years in the AFL from 1997 to 2001. Meaning, Collingwood did not honour its agreement,
 
"I will reiterate to our board that if the Port Adelaide Football Club should succeed at ranking higher than the Collingwood Football Club for three consecutive years in the AFL then our objections will be waived.”
McAllister's letter only indicates he would put the proposal to the board, I assume he did and the board subsequently rejected it.
 
McAllister's letter only indicates he would put the proposal to the board, I assume he did and the board subsequently rejected it.

That is not what 'reiterate' means. It mean he again clarified the position that if PAFC should secede at ranking higher than Collingwood Football Club for three consecutive years in the AFL then the CFC objections would be waived.

If Ed's word as President is the official CFC position, then equally it holds that Mc's was as well.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Port Adelaide's plan to use jumpers similar to Collingwood

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top