To get that result we would have to play minimal developing players. Developing players make mistakes and get beaten physically. You have to accept them losing their position on the ground most of the time until you get them to 30 games, if not 50 games, unless they are a rare exception.
Plus, if you finish 9th or whatever you won't be getting any premium top 3 or top 5 draft picks.
Getting belted every week isn't a great environment for young players, but if we finish mid ladder playing lots of old players there are definate costs to that strategy also.
I would rather a bottoming out than a propping up because i think a bottoming out would inevitably have to follow a prop up anyway.
Playing young or developing players doesn't equal losing every week - unless we only prioritise playing youngsters and throw all of the veterans etc out of the side (clearly we aren't doing that, as we've just given some contracts rather than follow the Hawthorn route).
It will just mean that at times those developing players play in positions that are not going to be their primary spot going forward.
Hopefully Culley and Hewett rotate mid/fwd. Ginbey Fwd/back (with likely Shuey and Yeo). Long and Burgeil play mostly forward if they come in (possibly where they end up anyway, but that remains to be seen). Hough will play a bit of wing and a bit of back. Chesser, lets get him on the park, but likely another wing/HBF.
Are any going to dominate from day 1... probably not (gut feel says Culley may well do so, but technically this is his second season anyway!), but that doesn't mean they lose their battle on the day either. Breaking even is not a bad result for a youngster (and TBH for the whole squad after 2022!).