Premiership Coach 2016 playing lists

[haydo]

its unthinkable!

He has now been created

 

[George]

with the potential - it mainly is dictated by age so it can be hard to change it

Ah right I didn't realize...Coughlan is six months older than O'Kearney, don't know if that makes any difference.

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Ah right I didn't realize...Coughlan is six months older than O'Kearney, don't know if that makes any difference.

normally doesnt - it is the age in years i think has most effect on it

 

[haydo]

I reckon swap O'Kearney and Coughlan's stats around - I think NOK will be the better player.

And I don't know if those names have been put in incorrectly in game or not, but a few fixes;

Nick Coughlan*
Nick O'Kearney*

You can probably bump up Webster's potential to 85ish and Jack Sinclair's as well.

Dylan Roberton was in our top 10 last year, so his potential could take a jump to that 85 or thereabouts mark too.


Looks great though mate!

Thanks for the notes. The names were just typed different on the excel spreadsheet.... all correct in game though

 

[saintkildaman]

Looks real good. Besides what has already been mentioned (Sinclair, Roberton, Webster) only other player I would bump up would be Savage. Think he should be around 80-82, one of our better players and gets tagged nearly every week.

 

[AngryRanga]

* Overall and Peak rating may have changed since I put the "consistency" up to 100%

Cotchin more of an 88, has never backed up that 2012 season, doesn't deserve to be in that elite category.
Bachar Houli should be at least an 82, he's comfortably better and more important that 80-81 group you've got ahead of him.

* Overall and Peak rating may have changed since I put the "consistency" up to 100%

saintkildaman

Dylan Roberton should be an 80, had a great season last year off half back. I'd keep his potential at around an 83.
Tom Curren should be lower, for someone who played a year of VFL he's rated higher than a few of our best 22. Mav Weller should take Curren's spot at a 78/79 ish with his 83 potential, and Curren should drop down to a 75 overall and 78 ish potential.
Jack Sinclair should be similiar to Jack Lonie in current overall, around the mid 70's, and his potential should be bumped up to 84 odd.

Sorry if it seems I'm being demanding, it's hard to fit a polite tone into my list of changes.

I personally would have put Lonie on about par with McCartin

I think that is more McCartin being worse than a 78 than Lonie being better than a 76, but I don't have the heart to suggest that our #1 pick be downgraded.

 

[haydo]

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

probably have Lloyd higher - maybe 76
otherwise everything seems good

 

[scaryness]

Would say Heeney, Lloyd, and Cunningham are too low. Would probably go 78-79, 76-77, and 75-76 respectively.

Would say Rohan, T Richards, and B Jack are too high. Would go 76-77, 76-77 and 71-72 respectively.

 

[haydo]

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Barrass is severly underrated, he played 2 games and performed well - should be at least 73 or 74
Brophy lower - still learning the game

 

[Grockadoc]

* Overall and Peak rating may have changed since I put the "consistency" up to 100%

From a Richmond perspective I'd probably have:

Cotchin lower (perhaps an 88)
Rance higher (88-89)
Gordon was delisted so is not on the list.
Houli higher. Probably Gordons rating (82)
Elton too high. Maybe a 74.
Vickery's rating should be higher (Compared to Griffiths who has the same overall but a higher peak.)
McKenzie too high. 72 with a peak of 86 would be about right.
Rioli too high. Should be about 70 with a peak of 88.
Hampson too low. Should be 75.
McBean is too low. Should be 73-74.

 

[the_one]

1. West Coast – 19W, 3L, 120.04%
2. Hawthorn – 17W, 5L, 118.90%
3. Geelong – 16W, 6L, 108.78%
4. Fremantle – 15W, 7L, 107.72%
5. Gold Coast – 14W, 8L, 113.73%
6. Collingwood – 14W, 8L, 109.88%
7. Richmond – 12W, 10L, 111.23%
8. Melbourne – 12W, 10L, 111.15%
-------------------------------------------------------
9. Adelaide – 12W, 10L, 97.90%
10. Western Bulldogs – 10W, 12L, 100.44%
11. Brisbane – 10W, 12, 98.08%
12. Sydney – 9W, 13L, 98.98%
13. Port Adelaide – 9W, 13L, 92.82%
14. Carlton – 5W, 17L, 80.73%
15. St.Kilda – 5W, 17L, 79.42%
16. North Melbourne – 4W, 18L, 90.24%
17. Essendon – 4W, 18L, 76.71%


Top 5 Disposals

1. Patrick Dangerfield – Geelong – 784
2. Scott Pendlebury – Collingwood – 776
3. Gary Ablett – Gold Coast – 725
4. Daniel Hannebery – Sydney – 636
5. Dayne Zorko – Brisbane – 625


Top 5 Goal kickers

1. Jeremy Howe – Collingwood – 86 (Not too happy about this)
2. Jack Darling – West Coast - 85
3. Jack Gunston – Hawthorn - 83
4. Lance Franklin – Sydney - 80
5. Sam Day – Gold Coast – 76


Top 5 hitouts

1. Todd Golstein – Kangaroos - 645
2. Stefan Martin – Brisbane - 576
3. Ivan Maric – Richmond - 565
4. Matthew Lobbe – Port Adelaide - 514
5. Billy Longer – St.Kilda – 484


Top 5 clearances

1. Joel Selwood – Geelong - 124
2. David Swallow – Gold Coast - 114
3. Luke Shuey – West Coast - 111
4. Jackson McCrae – Western Bulldogs - 109
5. Daniel Hannebery – Sydney – 108



All-Australian Side

B: Michael Firritto (NM) - Heriter Lumumba (Melb) - Clancee Pearce (Frem)
HB: Grant Birchall (Haw) - Jacob Weitering (Carl) - Pearce Hanley (Bris)
C: Nathan Jones (Melb) - Patrick Dangerfield (Geel) - Robbie Gray (PA)
HF: Paul Puopolo (Haw) - Lance Franklin (Syd) - Chad Wingard (PA)
FF: David Swallow (GC) - Jack Darling (WC) - Todd Goldstein (Kang)
R: Nic Naitanui (WC) – Gary Ablett (GC) – Scott Pendlebury (Coll)
INT: Luke Parker (Syd) – Dustin Martin (Rich) – Ben Jacobs (Kang) – Nat Fyfe (Frem)


MVP award

1. Patrick Dangerfield – Geel – 83
2. Scott Pendlebury – Coll – 68
3. Lance Franklin – Syd – 64
4. Nathan Jones – Melb – 55
5. Nat Fyfe – Frem – 51


Brownlow Medal count

1. Todd Goldstein – Kangaroos – 32
2. Lance Franklin – Sydney – 29
3. Gary Ablett – Gold Coast – 25
4. Scott Pendlebury – Collingwood – 24
5. Patrick Dangerfield – Geelong – 24


AFL Grand Final result

West Coast: 2.2 – 5.7 – 8.8 – 13.12 – (90)
Hawthorn: 4.2 – 9.6 – 12.9 – 14.10 – (94)


Rising Star Award

Daniel Rioli – Richmond


Retired Players

Daniel Merrett – Brisbane – 203 games
Dane Swan – Collingwood – 280 games
Matthew Boyd – Western Bulldogs – 259 games
Jimmy Bartel – Geelong – 296 games
Nick Malceski – Gold Coast – 206 games
Nick Riewoldt – St.Kilda – 320 games

Wondering why North are always so bad in PC?

 

[haydo]

Wondering why North are always so bad in PC?

Aren't we all always wondering this. Doesn't matter what we do (editing wise) they're still so bad

 

[Grockadoc]

Sydney and North are always the ones who no matter who they have always seem to be programmed to be terrible.

 

[scaryness]

Club facilities, maybe?

 

[bone2468]

Quick question lads.
How do I bump the consistency to 100 so I don't get bums kicking 100+ I wanna have a realistic experience for once

 

[Millky95]

Heeney to match Mills
Lloyd and Jones higher

Rohan and BJ too high

 

[Van_Dyke]

I'd put Gaff down to a 85/93, Masten to a 78 (he's very borderline being in the best 22), Mackenzie to a 85. Would also bump Barrass up to a 73/81 and Nelson to 75.

 

[saintkildaman]

You've done very well with the lists Haydo. It's a big achievement that you only have day 3 or 4 max changes suggested per list by supporters who watch thier team every week. I know I wouldn't have been able to do as well as you, kudos.

 

[Grockadoc]

Heeney to match Mills
Lloyd and Jones higher

Rohan and BJ too high

I would swap Mills and Heeney's ratings personally. Hard to have a player not to have played a game have a rating of 83, no matter how big the wraps on him are.

 

[the_one]

Club facilities, maybe?

is there no way to edit club facilities rankings?

 

[haydo]

is there no way to edit club facilities rankings?

I don't believe so. I mean the Kangaroos "for some reason" have $2,000,000 in loans from the AFL throughout the game, so I have removed that, so we'll see if that can make them a little better

 

[scaryness]

I don't believe so. I mean the Kangaroos "for some reason" have $2,000,000 in loans from the AFL throughout the game, so I have removed that, so we'll see if that can make them a little better

I think in the club xml files you can change their facilities in the finance section. Training, Equip, Medical. Just checked the base file and it looks like 1=A+, 2=A, etc.

 

[TheBeardAmigos]

Hey guys,

just thought i let you know, i am hoping to get my version of the lists out next week.
wont be as good as haydo169 , but hopefully it will entertain you guys for the time until Haydo releases his

Cheers guys