suntagonal
Team Captain
Doubt it, but I like the cut of his jibe. Telling it the way it is
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Training Preseason 15/16 - TTHD
- Thread starter Suma Magic
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
What 10m rule change
- Apr 3, 2010
- 3,365
- 5,941
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Philly Eagles, Boston Red Sox
must be 10m away from person with the ball after a mark instead of 5
Bender_
X
It's been trialled in the NAB, now it's been decided that it's permanent; instead of the 5m protected area for a mark/free kick it's 10m.
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Who must be?
Bender_
X
Any opposition player that isn't running next to a direct opponent. It's the same as the 5m rule now, just 10m.
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
What if you happen to be 7 metres away from the guy taking a mark, is that an auto 50 metre penalty or do you have time to get out of the way?
And what about someone having a shot at goal and you want to stop them running around and snapping?
- Apr 3, 2010
- 3,365
- 5,941
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Philly Eagles, Boston Red Sox
Ok while we are asking questions the countdown clock for shot at goal as soon as it hits 0 can someone run in or does the player have to wait for the umpire? Do you have to have kicked it or just started your approach by the time it hits 0?
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
10 metres sounds like a ridiculously big distance.
What is the benefit of this rule change?
- Apr 3, 2010
- 3,365
- 5,941
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Philly Eagles, Boston Red Sox
A more open free flowing game if not wrong
10m is absolutely ridiculous
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
All I'm seeing is a big increase in incidental 50 metre penalties being given, pissing everyone off greatly
Whats the difference between the countdown clock and the regular 30 seconds players are given to kick for goal? I always assumed the umpires could call "play on" when they arbitrarily decided 30 seconds had elapsed (so a player could be in the middle of their run-up and the ump could call "play on" if they had taken an excessive amount of time to kick it). Is this wrong?
And doesnt the new 10m rule just encourage flood tactics? If you cant zone off effectively wont players just flood back to protect the space?
- Apr 3, 2010
- 3,365
- 5,941
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Philly Eagles, Boston Red Sox
No idea its what i want to know haha
- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
This is going to screw with the Weagles Web isn't it
- Sep 28, 2009
- 23,825
- 34,243
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Reading FC
I would say you have to wait for the umpires whistle. The shot clock is more for the crowd.
Bender_
X
"we need to cap the rotations, the game is too fast and there's to many injuries!"
"let's make the protected area in the mark bigger to open the game up!"
****en dumb campaigners.
The Don't Argue
Debutant
- Apr 10, 2006
- 89
- 114
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Shite rule that ruined shite NAB cup games.
The other issue with this that i've seen is umpires still letting the opposition interfere with the man on the mark. If this happens the guy with the ball has at least 10 metres all around him. In regards to the web i think it could have the negative effect of players being able to clear the back of it more often.
Here2tellyouwhy
SA GREAT
Hawthorn are the reason for the new 10m safe zone rule.
They place a guy 5m off the ball carrier/man on the mark so he can't chip it inboard into the corridor.
He bombs it down the line. Hawks win the ball back and carve you up. Only have to do this 5 times to give them an edge and the 4 points.
What the AFL are trying to achieve is to move that guy blocking the inside path to 10m from the bloke with the ball. He can then take on the man on the mark, handball to someone running past, break a step or two inboard and make a short kick. It opens up all the angles and increases his options. It's all about getting the ball to flow and keep moving. If he gets blocked in and bombs it down the line, the rolling maul just moves down 50m.
The new deliberate OOB rules help keep the ball in play and in motion.
As for the shotclock rule, that's plain bollocks. It's not basketball FFS. Plus the GABBA and SCG don't have the tech to make it work so typical AFL they wont have it but all the other major grounds will.
Surely that disadvantages certain teams.
They place a guy 5m off the ball carrier/man on the mark so he can't chip it inboard into the corridor.
He bombs it down the line. Hawks win the ball back and carve you up. Only have to do this 5 times to give them an edge and the 4 points.
What the AFL are trying to achieve is to move that guy blocking the inside path to 10m from the bloke with the ball. He can then take on the man on the mark, handball to someone running past, break a step or two inboard and make a short kick. It opens up all the angles and increases his options. It's all about getting the ball to flow and keep moving. If he gets blocked in and bombs it down the line, the rolling maul just moves down 50m.
The new deliberate OOB rules help keep the ball in play and in motion.
As for the shotclock rule, that's plain bollocks. It's not basketball FFS. Plus the GABBA and SCG don't have the tech to make it work so typical AFL they wont have it but all the other major grounds will.
Surely that disadvantages certain teams.
Bender_
X
It's alright guys, almost every other professional sport in the world has 2 or 3 rule changes per year. Right?
Similar threads
